International Public Notice: The Long Journey of Eduardo Rivera 2
By Anna Von Reitz


Yesterday, we released a long series of documents containing Dr. Rivera's research into the nature of the American Federal Courts and in particular the nature of Federal Income Taxes and who holds the "duty" to pay them.

He doesn't yet realize that the word "duty" is employed because the "Taxpayer" is assumed to be a Warrant Officer in the British Merchant Marine Service who is charged with the "duty", as in Admiralty duty, to collect tariffs and taxes owed to the King and the British Crown in "the course of Maritime business and commerce".

He will learn.

He also doesn't realize that there are two (2) "Confederacies" in the early history of our country, one that was run from 1776-1781 by the unincorporated Federation of States doing business as The United States of America, and a second formalized Confederation doing business as the States of America from 1781 to 1861.

People in this country have been taught (wrongly) that The Articles of Confederation were replacing the Constitution, but in fact the desire to create "a more perfect union" was referencing the desire to replace the unwieldy confederation managed as a Committee by the Federation of States with a second, more organized Confederation managed by the Union, doing business as the States of America.

Those who have stuck with us know that from 1776 to 1781 the unincorporated Federation of States doing business as The United States of America handled all international and global business for the fledgling government.

Perceptive students will now ask -- how could that be, as international trade and commerce occur in different jurisdictions and involve different kinds of business structures under different forms of law?

The unincorporated Federation of States was inherently empowered to function under its own responsibility in all jurisdictions -- a quality and condition shared by unincorporated entities in general.

It could therefore operate in international jurisdiction as a public business enterprise supported by the Several States that are its members and which contributed their mutual powers to the Federation to act on their behalf to conduct international business for them.

The Federation could also operate the commercial functions through a Committee of incorporated States-of-States created by each one of its own member States.

This first confederacy overseen by The United States of America (our Federation) during The War of Independence is sometimes confused with the Second Confederation organized under The Articles of Confederation and operated by the States of America from 1781 to 1861.

Dr. Rivera has made this common mistake in some of his writings, but this is an arcane bit of history that does not detract from his overall conclusions about the nature of the courts and the issues.

We refer international readers to his synopsis and evaluation, which is, with the exception of minor errors of the kind mentioned above, in keeping with our own findings: foreign law has been misapplied to Americans who are not federal employees, not voluntarily operating in any Admiralty or Maritime jurisdiction, and who owe not duty to pay taxes or, that is, collect taxes and pay them out to foreign interests.

Another common error to be aware of when reading through Dr. Rivera's "Notes" is that throughout the early development of our country the lawyers followed the old Roman conventions and forms of translated Latin, so that the Union States are referred to as "states" and the members of the Federation are "States".

Similarly, they used "the United States" to name various entities from 1776 to 1851, when new style conventions were adopted in an effort to curb confusion and conform to English usage, as English is our Official Language.

Thus, the name of the country went from being "the United States" to "The United States", and the Union states became the Union States.

This requires us to observe when documents were produced either before or after 1851 when these changes were adopted, in order to discern which "United States" and what kind of "United States" is being referenced.

"the United States" prior to 1851 may refer to the Union states, the Federal Republic, the Municipal Government, or the British Territorial United States. After 1851, the proper name of this country among the nations of the world is: The United States.

The United States of America (Unincorporated) has always been the name of our Federation of States, but foreign incorporated versions exist or existed in the past: the United States of America, Incorporated, and The United States of America, Incorporated, and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, etc.

This information is provided to assist readers as they sort through Dr. Rivera's Notes, in the interest of keeping everything sorted out as we all go forward.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
May 3 2024

https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/8.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/9.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/10.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/11.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/12.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/13.pdf

The Long Journey of Eduardo Rivera -- The Nature of the Courts and Federal Taxes
By Anna Von Reitz


Dr. Rivera is a Juris Doctor of Law educated at Cambridge, with many honors and credits, but when he began his career and saw the travesties of the current justice system, he was appalled and confused.

Over the years I corresponded with him and at first, I am sure he thought I was a nutcase, but, slowly, as he tried one thing after another to end the corruption of the courts, and as nothing worked --- he was forced to pull straws and research things that were admittedly outside the box --- far outside the box --- and outside the policies and procedures he had been taught in Law School.

This honorable, determined man was confused for a long time, but as of today, I can safely say that his eyes are wide open and yes, he has come to the same conclusions regarding the "federal income tax" and the district courts as the rest of us Tin Hats.

Imagine that.

But even more important, read his summations called "notes" about these cases and issues for a bird's eye view -- both the Big Picture and the particulars:

You won't be sorry, and you will have more valuable insight into the corruption and the ways in which these games are played.
Bon appetite, and please enjoy! I did!

https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/1.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/2.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/3.docx Word document download
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/4.pdf Same as 3 but in PDF format
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/5.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/6.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/7.pdf

----------------------------

See this article and over 4700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

The Long Journey of Eduardo Rivera -- The Nature of the Courts and Federal Taxes
By Anna Von Reitz


Dr. Rivera is a Juris Doctor of Law educated at Cambridge, with many honors and credits, but when he began his career and saw the travesties of the current justice system, he was appalled and confused.

Over the years I corresponded with him and at first, I am sure he thought I was a nutcase, but, slowly, as he tried one thing after another to end the corruption of the courts, and as nothing worked --- he was forced to pull straws and research things that were admittedly outside the box --- far outside the box --- and outside the policies and procedures he had been taught in Law School.

This honorable, determined man was confused for a long time, but as of today, I can safely say that his eyes are wide open and yes, he has come to the same conclusions regarding the "federal income tax" and the district courts as the rest of us Tin Hats.

Imagine that.

But even more important, read his summations called "notes" about these cases and issues for a bird's eye view -- both the Big Picture and the particulars:

You won't be sorry, and you will have more valuable insight into the corruption and the ways in which these games are played.
Bon appetite, and please enjoy! I did!

https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/1.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/2.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/3.docx Word document download
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/4.pdf Same as 3 but in PDF format
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/5.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/6.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/7.pdf

----------------------------

See this article and over 4700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

The Russell Westbrook Effect: How His Style is Shaping Basketball Cult

In the fast-paced and fiercely competitive world of basketball, few players command attention quite like Russell Westbrook. With his electrifying style of play and relentless passion on the court, Westbrook has not only captivated fans but also left an indelible mark on the very fabric of basketball culture.

From his early days as a high-flying rookie to his current status as a seasoned veteran, Westbrook's impact extends far beyond his impressive stat lines. His fearlessness, unmatched intensity, and unwavering determination have redefined what it means to play the game with heart. Whether he's attacking the rim with ferocity, threading needle-like passes through tight defenses, or crashing the boards with tenacity, Westbrook's playing style is a masterclass in sheer athleticism and unwavering commitment.

But it's not just Westbrook's on-court prowess that sets him apart; it's his unique fashion sense and unapologetic self-expression that have transcended the boundaries of the sport. Westbrook's pregame outfits have become as anticipated as his triple-doubles, with the Oklahoma City Thunder-turned-Los Angeles Lakers star often pushing the envelope with bold patterns, daring colors, and boundary-pushing silhouettes. From tailored suits to avant-garde ensembles, Westbrook's sartorial choices have become as much a part of his persona as his thunderous dunks.

Off the court, Westbrook's influence is equally profound. Through his philanthropic endeavors and community outreach initiatives, he has used his platform to uplift others and effect positive change in society. Whether it's through his Why Not? Foundation, which focuses on empowering youth through education and sports, or his vocal advocacy for social justice causes, Westbrook's commitment to making a difference is as relentless as his play on the hardwood. He's not just a basketball player; he's a role model, a leader, and a catalyst for change.



As young athletes and fans across the globe look to Westbrook for inspiration, it's clear that his impact on basketball culture is far-reaching and enduring. Whether he's blazing down the court for a fast break, making a statement with his fashion-forward attire, or lending his voice to important social issues, one thing is certain: the Russell Westbrook effect is here to stay, shaping the future of the game and inspiring generations to come.

See article details: https://www.skullridding.com/blogs/the-russell-westbrook-effect-how-his-style-is-shaping-basketball-cult

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/05/they-lied-you-biden-regime-issues-rule-change/