International Public Notice: The Long Journey of Eduardo Rivera 2
By Anna Von Reitz


Yesterday, we released a long series of documents containing Dr. Rivera's research into the nature of the American Federal Courts and in particular the nature of Federal Income Taxes and who holds the "duty" to pay them.

He doesn't yet realize that the word "duty" is employed because the "Taxpayer" is assumed to be a Warrant Officer in the British Merchant Marine Service who is charged with the "duty", as in Admiralty duty, to collect tariffs and taxes owed to the King and the British Crown in "the course of Maritime business and commerce".

He will learn.

He also doesn't realize that there are two (2) "Confederacies" in the early history of our country, one that was run from 1776-1781 by the unincorporated Federation of States doing business as The United States of America, and a second formalized Confederation doing business as the States of America from 1781 to 1861.

People in this country have been taught (wrongly) that The Articles of Confederation were replacing the Constitution, but in fact the desire to create "a more perfect union" was referencing the desire to replace the unwieldy confederation managed as a Committee by the Federation of States with a second, more organized Confederation managed by the Union, doing business as the States of America.

Those who have stuck with us know that from 1776 to 1781 the unincorporated Federation of States doing business as The United States of America handled all international and global business for the fledgling government.

Perceptive students will now ask -- how could that be, as international trade and commerce occur in different jurisdictions and involve different kinds of business structures under different forms of law?

The unincorporated Federation of States was inherently empowered to function under its own responsibility in all jurisdictions -- a quality and condition shared by unincorporated entities in general.

It could therefore operate in international jurisdiction as a public business enterprise supported by the Several States that are its members and which contributed their mutual powers to the Federation to act on their behalf to conduct international business for them.

The Federation could also operate the commercial functions through a Committee of incorporated States-of-States created by each one of its own member States.

This first confederacy overseen by The United States of America (our Federation) during The War of Independence is sometimes confused with the Second Confederation organized under The Articles of Confederation and operated by the States of America from 1781 to 1861.

Dr. Rivera has made this common mistake in some of his writings, but this is an arcane bit of history that does not detract from his overall conclusions about the nature of the courts and the issues.

We refer international readers to his synopsis and evaluation, which is, with the exception of minor errors of the kind mentioned above, in keeping with our own findings: foreign law has been misapplied to Americans who are not federal employees, not voluntarily operating in any Admiralty or Maritime jurisdiction, and who owe not duty to pay taxes or, that is, collect taxes and pay them out to foreign interests.

Another common error to be aware of when reading through Dr. Rivera's "Notes" is that throughout the early development of our country the lawyers followed the old Roman conventions and forms of translated Latin, so that the Union States are referred to as "states" and the members of the Federation are "States".

Similarly, they used "the United States" to name various entities from 1776 to 1851, when new style conventions were adopted in an effort to curb confusion and conform to English usage, as English is our Official Language.

Thus, the name of the country went from being "the United States" to "The United States", and the Union states became the Union States.

This requires us to observe when documents were produced either before or after 1851 when these changes were adopted, in order to discern which "United States" and what kind of "United States" is being referenced.

"the United States" prior to 1851 may refer to the Union states, the Federal Republic, the Municipal Government, or the British Territorial United States. After 1851, the proper name of this country among the nations of the world is: The United States.

The United States of America (Unincorporated) has always been the name of our Federation of States, but foreign incorporated versions exist or existed in the past: the United States of America, Incorporated, and The United States of America, Incorporated, and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, etc.

This information is provided to assist readers as they sort through Dr. Rivera's Notes, in the interest of keeping everything sorted out as we all go forward.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
May 3 2024

https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/8.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/9.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/10.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/11.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/12.pdf
https://annavonreitz.com/rivera/13.pdf

Texas Jurisdiction REFUSES to Enforce SCOTUS Ruling Allowing Cops to Arrest Illegals https://www.infowars.com/posts/texas-jurisdiction-refuses-to-enforce-scotus-ruling-allowing-cops-to-arrest-illegals/

Mastering AutoCAD: Essential Tips for Building Permit Drawings

Welcome, AutoCAD enthusiasts, to our latest blog post dedicated to mastering the art of building permit drawings. At AutoCADAssignmenthelp.com, we understand the challenges students face when tasked with creating precise and compliant drawings for building permits. That's why we're here to provide expert guidance and support to help you excel in your assignments. In this post, we'll delve into essential tips and solutions to ensure success with your "Help with Building Permit Drawings Assignment." So, let's dive in and sharpen those AutoCAD skills!

Question 1: How do you ensure that your building permit drawings are compliant with local regulations?

Solution:
Ensuring compliance with local building codes and regulations is paramount when creating building permit drawings. Here's how our expert tackles this challenge:

Research: Before diving into the design process, it's essential to research and familiarize yourself with the specific building codes and regulations applicable to your project's location. This may include requirements regarding structural integrity, fire safety, accessibility, and more.

Consultation: If you're unsure about any aspect of the local regulations, don't hesitate to seek guidance from professionals familiar with the jurisdiction's building codes. Architects, engineers, and building officials can provide valuable insights and ensure that your drawings meet all necessary requirements.

Double-Check: Once your drawings are complete, take the time to carefully review them against the relevant building codes and regulations. Look for any discrepancies or areas where adjustments may be needed to ensure compliance.

By following these steps, you can create building permit drawings that not only meet regulatory standards but also demonstrate your commitment to quality and professionalism.

Question 2: How can you optimize your workflow to improve efficiency when working on building permit drawings assignments?

Solution:
Efficiency is key when it comes to completing AutoCAD assignments, especially those involving building permit drawings. Here are some expert tips to help streamline your workflow:

Templates: Create standardized templates for common building elements such as floor plans, elevations, and sections. This will save time by allowing you to reuse existing designs rather than starting from scratch for each project.

Use of Blocks: Utilize blocks for repetitive elements within your drawings, such as doors, windows, and fixtures. By defining these elements as blocks, you can easily insert them into your designs and maintain consistency throughout your drawings.

Keyboard Shortcuts: Familiarize yourself with keyboard shortcuts for commonly used AutoCAD commands. This will help you perform tasks more quickly and efficiently, ultimately speeding up your workflow.

Layer Management: Develop a logical layering system for organizing elements within your drawings. This will make it easier to control visibility, make edits, and ensure that your drawings are well-organized and easy to navigate.

By implementing these strategies, you can optimize your workflow and complete building permit drawings assignments with greater efficiency and accuracy.

In conclusion, mastering AutoCAD for building permit drawing assignments requires a combination of technical knowledge, attention to detail, and efficient workflow practices. Whether you're navigating complex regulatory requirements or seeking ways to streamline your design process, AutoCADAssignmenthelp.com is here to support you every step of the way. With our expert guidance and resources, you'll be well-equipped to tackle any AutoCAD assignment that comes your way. Happy drawing!

Visit at: https://www.autocadassignmenthelp.com/building-permit-drawings-assignment/

#AutoCAD #CADDesign #AutoCADTips #Engineering

International Public Notice: They Have No Gold
By Anna Von Reitz


The simple fact is that all physical assets belong to physical living people. The Law of Kinds is invoked.

Only men and women have gold, silver, land, soil, water, air, indeed all the material interests of this planet belong to people, not persons, and can only belong to the living people.

Any provision we make for corporations to own anything extends to their right to exist and conduct business "for any lawful purpose". Legal purposes are disallowed.

Persons, mere humans, working as public employees and institutions have tried to insert themselves as middlemen and purloin the rights and assets of the living, but this cannot be permitted.

And this is the issue at Law that our own courts which have superior concurrent general jurisdiction have answered; we do not choose to let our public employees represent us in the matter of our physical assets and credit derived from our physical assets.

Our country and its fifty nation-states are fully endowed in all jurisdictions and have sent our lawful Fiduciary to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) according to our Law and Custom -- with reference to accounting due on land jurisdiction assets owed to Americans by the 63 central bank members of the Bank for International Settlements -- which includes the so-called Off-Ledger Accounts and Legacy Trust Accounts; there are no Legal Persons authorized to distribute or claim or use our gold, silver, land, cash, or corporate holdings and no current contract allowing their use or distribution.

This should be of concern to the whole world, as our resources have underwritten all trade and commercial transactions in the Western World and part of the Eastern Hemisphere, too, for more than a century. An accounting has been due from the Global Federal Reserve since 2005, and other banks are similarly overdue.

The U.S. Congress has no gold of its own and has merely purloined credit based on our assets for over twenty years, based on the False Presumption that we have been silent and therefore allowing them to spend our credit willy-nilly on genocidal pandemics, wars for profit, and other atrocities -- which is simply not true.

We fully respect both international and domestic laws against genocide and against criminality of the kind that has been fostered by these Legal Fictions and their Persons, and we have been steadily, determinedly, trying to gain the cooperation of the banks in addressing this gross malfeasance and misadministration of our assets, including our credit.

The idea popularized by the late-Queen's Government and the Government of Westminster ever since the bankruptcy of the old Federal Reserve System, that we have been "absent" or failing to do our part to manage our own business, is countermanded by a long list of court and administrative actions that admit that: (1) we are present; (2) we have the right to the assets and their administration; (3) the central banks have been continuing to discount our claims in the face of supreme court rulings and circuit and federal court rulings proving that we are the Parties having all survivorship interest in the Estates we have referenced.

To avoid chaos, we have requested a simple accounting of our deposits with the central banks as a prelude to negotiations and stipulations that will allow us all to proceed on a firm and realistic footing.

Our gold and silver, our cash assets, our land assets, and corporation holdings must be held harmless.
There has been no contract allowing the banks to do what they have done since 2005.

All of these holdings are ours and are under the direction -- not of Congressmen acting as "Representatives", but instead, are directly the responsibility of our Fiduciaries and our unincorporated Holding Company, The United States of America.

The assets of the Avila Family Trust are likewise under the care and direction of living men and women, not Human Persons, and not incorporated Legal Fictions of any kind.

This should be understood and accepted by everyone reading this, as it stands to reason that the three-dimensional world cannot be made to serve a realm of two dimensional fictional reality; the creation is never greater than the Creator.

It would be a strange thing, indeed, if we were to hand over our most precious possessions and future to the care of Foreign Persons hired to provide certain stipulated services, none of which include any administration of our property and estates.

We deny any contract with any Maritime or Admiralty or incorporated Church authority claiming a public or private interest in our Estates and/or Deposits related to our physical assets and credit derived therefrom.

It is self-evident that our names and authorities have appeared historically and that our methods of doing business have stood the test of time without reference to any foreign power, much less such power as may be granted to foreign corporations in the business of providing essential government services.

We repeat the obvious: neither the British Territorial U.S. Congress, nor any Congressman belonging to this Body Politic, nor any General or Admiral or Representative Person, has any gold of their own to offer, and therefore, no say in what we choose to do as men and women taking action with respect to our own physical assets.

Both the assets and the credit derived from the assets belong to the actual Inheritors, Survivors, Progeny, Donor-Beneficiaries -- all living men and women without exception.

We therefore call upon all recipients of this message to honor the facts and the Law of Kinds, the signatures and powers firmly attached to the multiple and irrevocable general Powers of Attorney, the Swift Messages that were sent to all the Central Banks by the M1 Authority, and court rulings that support our position. We are available to meet with representatives of the Bank of Internationals Settlements and its members.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

http://www.paulstramer.net/2024/02/international-public-notice-they-have.html

https://tasa.americanstatenationals.org/correct-your-status/

International Public Notice: Plain Speaking
By Anna Von Reitz


We and the living people we represent and those unincorporated institutions of the living people that we own and represent, are the long-lost owners and possessors, the Donor-Beneficiaries, the ones who hold the only survivorship interest in all these named Estates, Trusts, and Legacies.

We own the Federal Reserve Banks -- all of them.

They were all in gross debt to us and still are. They are insolvent by definition and we foreclosed and we hold all the cured UCC-liens and other options regarding them.

There is, therefore, no need for any "correspondence bank" as all banks in the system are by definition our banks and we hold superior concurrent general jurisdiction. We can operate freely on air, land, and sea.

We, the living people, own all survivorship interest in all the off-ledger assets that are the asset backbone of all 63 member banks of record in the Bank of International Settlements.

Trying to impersonate us has not succeeded and will not succeed in future.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

http://www.paulstramer.net/2024/02/international-public-notice-plain.html

https://tasa.americanstatenationals.org/correct-your-status/