International Public Notice: Virus Fraud
By Anna Von Reitz


We will let Mike Adams say it for us:
"Bombshell news today on the vaccine front as AstraZeneca, after admitting its covid jabs cause fibrous clots, is now withdrawing its covid vaccine from the entire world marketplace.

The EU has now revoked authorization for this vaccine, meaning it is now illegal to administer this jab to anyone in the EU.

Meanwhile, an attempted reinfection trial that exposed volunteers to 10,000 times the "dose" of covid deemed necessary to cause infections failed to produce a single infection. The premise of virology as being capable of causing pandemics is a total fraud. And that means vaccines are a fraud, too."

We could not surpass his brevity or logic.

Contrary to what the perpetually gullible Public has been led to believe, The Virus Theory, also known as The Germ Theory, is, and has always remained a theory with as many bits of evidence against it as for it.

While the introduction of any foreign substance does trigger the immune system and if it is a biological entity or molecule will provoke the creation of specific antibodies, that doesn't really prove anything about the nature of what we have come to call "viruses".

All this does is prove things about the immune system and basic mechanisms of immunity, leaving the more basic issue of the Causative Agent in limbo.

Our scientists assure us that viruses, also called "exosomes" are dead, little pinched off particles of DNA and waste products encapsulated in a protein shell.

Can dead things "infect"? Not really.

Think of waste DNA and RNA as Hazmat and the protein shell of a virus as a specially designed waste container with a lid. The protein shell is not alive, but its contents, the degraded bits of deoxy or ribonucleic acid can still replicate, if they get back inside a cell.

And then what have you got?

You've got bits of polluted and degraded foreign DNA or RNA snippets coding for foreign proteins inside your cells.

Those foreign proteins then hit your system like a sledge hammer and provoke your immune response -- which is then misidentified as a "disease".

It can be any disease, depending on the nature of the DNA or RNA contained in the "virus" packet, and the nature of the resulting immune response to whatever foreign proteins are being produced.

Blood clotting factor snippets of DNA or RNA code result in foreign blood clotting factor proteins and your immune system reacts to them, specifically.

Tumor producing snippets of DNA or RNA code result in foreign tumor proteins and your immune system reacts to them, specifically.

Each set of such stimulus-response reactions is different, so, Astrazeneca's "vaccine" loaded with blood clotting factor snippets of RNA (left over from a Department of Defense Experiment during the Iraq War) leads to "fibrous clots" as the foreign blood clotting factor proteins meet your body's immune response.

Depending on what the "payload" of DNA or RNA snippets are, you exhibit different symptoms and appear to have different diseases.

Our cell walls and membranes naturally work to exclude foreign DNA and RNA and keep this intracellular production of foreign proteins from happening, but thanks to Doctor Fauci and other Mad Scientists --- tech-crazed men with no actual brains or hearts --- this natural barrier has purportedly been overcome.

To our universal detriment.

We are calling for an immediate full stop and end of production and injection of all DNA and RNA "vaccines" worldwide.

We are calling for the prosecution and public punishment of all the Corporations responsible for this genocidal crime against humanity, and in the case of this country, the prosecution of the US CONGRESS and its Members, which recklessly and in gross negligence and dereliction of duty agreed to accept the liability for vaccine manufacturers.

Let them have the liability for all this expense and disruption and death -- individually, personally, and with 100% commercial liability.

And may no bank dare to give them as much as a peso of our credit. They were not acting "for" us or in our favor when they did this, and they do not deserve any indemnification or insurance at public cost.

The UN CORPORATION has promoted war instead of stopping it, and has contributed to this genocide through its WHO organization. We see no reason for its continued existence, much less any treaty empowering it in any way.

We call for the immediate liquidation of the UN CORPORATION and WHO, both, and an end to any further discussion of a sea "treaty" among the guilty corporations to grant any purported powers possessed by any corporation to either entity.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

Today
$836 Million COVID-19 Relief Scam Unearthed – Where It Truly Went Will Leave You Speechless!
Posted Byby Johnny Merchant November 11, 2023
SHARE
The Department of Justice has dropped a bombshell on us, folks! Brace yourselves for this shocking revelation: 371 people are now facing charges for ripping off a mind-boggling $836 million in COVID-19 relief funds. That’s money that was meant to help struggling Americans during the pandemic!

This infuriating news comes after a painstaking three-month investigation by law enforcement agencies. And here’s the kicker, folks: 63 out of those 371 folks are hardcore gang members and criminals with violent ties. They didn’t stop at just stealing; some of these crooks even used the funds for murder-for-hire plots! It’s like something out of a Hollywood crime thriller.
Where did this stolen treasure come from, you ask? Well, a chunk of it was siphoned off from pandemic unemployment insurance and various Small Business Administration programs, including the Paycheck Protection Program and economic injury disaster loans. That’s right, they didn’t spare anything!

But it gets worse! These charges are on top of the 3,000 individuals the DOJ had already gone after, seizing a whopping $1.4 billion in pandemic relief funds. It’s like a never-ending saga of corruption and greed!
The most infuriating part? The Paycheck Protection Program alone saw a mind-boggling $200 billion in fraudulent payments – that’s a jaw-dropping 17% of the loans awarded. Can you imagine the audacity of these criminals?

And what did they do with all that stolen cash? Luxury cars, private jets, vacation homes, and designer bling – you name it! These crooks were living the high life, while hardworking Americans were struggling to make ends meet. Just last week, a real estate broker got a slap on the wrist with a three-and-a-half-year prison sentence for using $381,000 in ill-gotten gains to buy a Bentley, a fancy apartment, and even cosmetic procedures. Outrageous!
But hold on to your hats, folks – it’s not all bad news. Some justice has been served, with 119 of these crooks already pleading guilty or being convicted. Another 117 cases were handled in civil court, but we’ve still got a long way to go. The DOJ claims to have recovered $231.4 million of the stolen funds so far, but that’s just a fraction of the colossal theft.

In the end, these COVID-19 stimulus programs have become a breeding ground for some of the most audacious fraud in history. Our hard-earned taxpayer money has been shamelessly used for self-enrichment by these criminals, all thanks to a woefully inadequate oversight and control system. It’s time for some serious accountability, and the American people deserve nothing less! 🇺🇸💥 #OutragedRepublicans #JusticeNow

https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1560688315865239568?referrer=aidandaniels #newtech #socialmedia #stimulus #stimulusapp

One Implication of the Metabolic Theory of Cancer
this armchair expert's logic

Cancer is not contagious, it cannot spread to non-cancerous cells. So to explain the common idea of cancer spreading from one area of the body to another, there are two mechanisms (three if one counts testing-as cause...):

A. Cancerous cells multiply in an uncontrolled fashion.
In so far as these may break-off, and float through the blood stream (alright, alright, it sounds dubious, but remind me again what the mainstream idea for this is so I can give a kosher metabolic theory version) and become established elsewhere in the body.
Cancer of the lymphatic system -- isn't that one mainstream topic of mechanism of cancer spread (as the lymphatic system exists throughout the body). Such cancer then establishes itself anywhere in the body the lymphatic system reaches, which is to say anywhere.
The point I am making is that when cancerous cells physically spread to other parts of the body, it is only those cancerous cells and their splits that are the cancer--no healthy cells would become part of the cancer simply by existing adjacently to cancer cells--the expanding of a cancerous tumor is the multiplication of the cells of the tumor *and not* an infectious spread into adjacent healthy cells. The metabolic theory of cancer implies cancer is metabolically related, at root, rather than, at root, a germ or viral-based disease; that implies a cancerous tumor itself, nor it's component cells, are not infectiously spreading cancer to healthy cells. That is not to deny (nor to discuss) the various proximate sparks to which cancer is attributed in the consensus view as the whole "cause," one of which is infection. Like pampas grass in Maui, the base "cause" is a background metabolic disorder, perhaps, though, only locally expressed in the cells in question (I mean "background" is a bit broad because probably we all are a bit metabolic); so it's not to deny chemical or other irritant nor germs or "viruses" (assuming existence thereof) as, proximate, cause:
So take the case of a, hypothetical, germ ("virus")-sparked cancer. The germs wouldn't just be spreading from the tumor they initially sparked to neighboring healthy cells, somehow "spreading" the cancer, but to wherever the germs are able to reach (as contained by the body's various firewalls). The neighboring cells to the tumor could not become cancerous by infection with this germ or "virus," or they would already have become cancerous early on contemporaneously with the cells of the tumor itself. The progress of a tumor and the free spread of a "virus" thought to have sparked it would each take their own separate course--a cancerous tumor is not a pocket of infection of cancer-causing "viruses," the cancer itself spreading cancer, via concentrated cancerous viral/germ infection to other parts of the body. But this brings us to the second means of cancerous spread: background conditions, in which category bacterial disease (or viral, if there be such a thing) falls into. Now of course, while the not very popular (never heard of it until I wrote these words) "germ" theory of cancer has merit, alongside radiation, chemical or other irritation, et cetera, the problem with a viral stimulus to cancer is that the concept of viruses is of an infection of cell *nucleuses*, whereas it has been conclusively proven that cancer is not at base a disease of the cell nucleus, that any nuclear symptoms are symptom not cause; cancer is not a genetic disease but a metabolic disease. In the experiment: Healthy nucleuses were put into cancer cells; the cells remained cancerous. Cancerous nucleuses were transplanted into healthy cells; the cells did not become cancerous.

B. the appearance of "spread" via background conditions: whether that be a broad-metabolic imbalance/metabolic inability or as the mainstream targets as to cause, the proximate "cause" or spark of the first cancer tumor found being also the very same cause, or spark, of subsequently discovered cancers in other locations in the body--which either from the same proximate cause subsequently develop or which are in fact only subsequently discovered.

(C.) Of course that leads to a third spark of cancer: testing. But testing as-cause for "cancer" is enough for its own post: cancer is by increased testing (recall the big boost in cancer recently was attributed by the legacy media to this) "discovered," treatment commences, and...kills the patient. Just a hypothesis, let me wriggle out of this last one, but suffice it to point out thar mainstream treatments, whether they currently are better or not, have historically been pretty useless, in my impression, but I think you think so too.

https://www.stimulus.com/ref/aidandaniels