International Public Notice -- The Mistaken Schism
By Anna Von Reitz


****It has been extraordinarily difficult to get this Notice posted in entirety. In the interests of properly demonstrating King John I's ability to contract for himself versus his inability to contract for England as a whole, we have amended this Notice, and are now sending the Amended Notice a second time:****

Key to all the illusions and delusions is the misunderstanding of what the "crown" is, and whether or not King John "acting as" King of England, had the right to sign and enforce his apparent Concession to Pope Innocent III, all those centuries ago?

And the answer is, yes, he did have the right to sign it with respect to himself and his limited Papal Office, but not with respect to England as a whole.

The grant of the Earth to Mankind is immutable and cannot be rescinded or changed or altered in any manner at all. It stands as fact, confirmed by Universal Law, and can only be altered by violating Universal Law.

This is also reflected in the Biblical Record that Christians, Muslims, and Jews all claim to believe, as an Express Trust vouchsafed to Mankind in The Book of Genesis, and such an Express Trust cannot be altered or redefined or reinterpreted by anyone.

If the Roman Catholics claim, copyright, and believe The Bible, then the Express Trust of the Creator which granted the Earth and the dominion thereof to Mankind cannot be redefined or reinterpreted as pertaining to Humans instead --- not by anyone, not even the Pope.

Yes, the grant is to living men, not "persons" -- that is, humans, instead.

It's ours--- all of us. Forever.

Now, we get to the Norman Conquest, which began in 1066 A.D. and ended in 1087 A.D. with the Settlement of the Norman Conquest by a Will, another Express Trust.

It was the Great Work of William, that is, Guillaume of Normandy, to utterly destroy any possibility of there ever being another singular King standing on the land jurisdiction of England.

At most, there could be an elected "King of Kings", a Corporate Office, severed from the Land and Soil except -- in some instances, for their own holdings, but certainly severed in the case of King John and his progeny.

Immediately upon seizing the land that he was owed by birthright and by agreement of Edward the Confessor (who among other things, "confessed" -- another word for "admitted"-- that William was the rightful King), William engaged in an excruciatingly detailed inventory of exactly what he had conquered.

Having considered the problem of England throughout his lifetime, William determined that the best way of ending all the mischief England caused was to divide it up, minutely, into separate little kingdoms, and to mix the land grants of these kingdoms into each other, so that all the neighbors would have good reason to live at peace with each other.

Thus, the grant of Shrewsbury to the ancestral and hereditary Lords, the Talbots, was not simply a grant of Shrewsbury and surrounds as one might imagine, but included sundry other parts and parcels scattered like islands in land belonging to other Lords.

Each one of these oddly distributed kingdoms was granted without limitation so that each one of the faithful French Barons became a sovereign in their own right in England, on their own parcels of land, vouchsafed to them by the only rightful owner of it.

And thanks to the fastidious inventory, absolutely all of England was surveyed and accounted for, so that not as much as a dock remained unsecured.

As a final safeguard, William the Conqueror, who ruled not only as a King by military conquest, but as the lawful heir from before Roman times, disinherited all his own children, so that they should have no interest in England at all.

England was to be most truly and permanently conquered by the self-interest of all his Barons, forever maintaining their own interest in their own kingdoms. Their self-interest was to be moderated by the scattering of their holdings, one into the other, so that access to and enjoyment of their holdings was interdependent. Finally, by removing the inheritance from his own children, William sealed his scheme to permanently subdue the megalomania of England and entrusted it to fate.

William's claim to England, which was admitted or "confessed", by Edward the Confessor, derived from the westward migration of the pagan Celts and in land holdings and familial relationships carried forward through the Roman Empire and through the Dark Ages into his own relatively modern times. We see the advent of Christianity into this particular pagan family as a record preserved in the stories about King Arthur, but having this particular impact some centuries later.

William wore his crown in England under different terms than the Anglo-Saxon Kings; William owned it all by rightful inheritance -- privately -- quite apart from any later-created public office as a Sovereign owing any Crown lands to Rome. William also ruled by military conquest, which is again, a private condition, not subject to political offices conferred by foreign powers.

So what William put in place, as well as what he denied being put in place, established what he most desired -- the division and permanent conquest of England.

He granted the land of England as a written Express Trust, known as a Will, and he left nothing to be interpreted; thanks to his extensive inventory and explicit language, the Settlement of the Norman Conquest was set in stone.

And it has required all the wiles and guile of the Successors of the Roman Empire to make it appear otherwise.

Now, let's look at the Crown, which is granted by the Pope, and which is an emblem of a political and spiritual office--- with rights and responsibilities dictated by the Pope.

Obviously, the Crown belongs to the Grantor and is granted to the Grantee; it was given to King John I as the Overseer of the Commonwealth lands of the Pope in England, and the true, fundamental Crown of England is a peculiarly Christian office and emblem attached firmly to the Roman Catholic Church and the common wealth land possessions in England that later became Commonwealth (Crown) lands upon being added to the Aeterni Regis Trust, around three hundred years after the Norman Conquest.

It was the original "common wealth lands" belonging to the Church that King John I was "King" of, as he was forever precluded from inheriting land in England, and in that capacity, he was always a vassal and agent of the Church of Rome. Never anything else.

A great deal of scholarly supposition, mainly by Roman Catholics, has attached to the "Concession" written and signed by King John I promising that he would yield his Crown to Pope Innocent III if he or his kingdom ever broke the pledges made in the Concession ---giving this an unwarranted importance and unjustifiable meaning.

King John established this Concession admitting his utter dependency and the dependency of his Crown on the Pope and the Church -- which is, of course, true, as he was only acting as an Overseer of Commonwealth lands gifted to the Church by former rulers.

A year later, he broke his apparent pledge to Rome by signing the Magna Carta. He had no contractual escape from this, either, as he, himself, owned no land in England and couldn't bind those who did.

Immediately after that, he was obligated to yield his Crown back to Pope Innocent III by operation of his prior contract, and again, forced to pay tax to rent his crown and regalia back.

And all of this was over what? His political and spiritual office as Overseer of the Pope's Commonwealth land in England.

The reason that the Magna Carta has stood for the better part of a thousand years is that all of this has been understood by the Heirs of the Norman Settlement in England, and from time to time, enforced, as it no doubt will be again.

The only true monarchs are the Heirs of the Norman Settlement, because they are the only living men and women who actually own the land by direct grant from the lawful inheritor -- and one must have earned a true claim to land to have standing as a sovereign.

The Pope's interest remains what it always has been-- the enjoyment, care, benefit, and upkeep of the gifts of land bequeathed to the Church as "common wealth" to be developed for the provision of relief to the poor, the ill, and the indigent.

The Pope never had anything to say about any of the other land holdings in England and it is merely a deceit and presumption to assume that he does, however it may be maintained and asserted by his appointees, agents, and officers.

It follows that "King" John I, as the Pope's Agent overseeing the Commonwealth lands, owed his Crown to the Pope, and that Crown was emblematic of a political and spiritual Office being exercised in an agency capacity and did not imply any direct land ownership by John.

The land and soil of England already belonged to the Norman Barons, which is why John was obligated to agree to the Magna Carta on all lands not belonging to the Church.

Much later, of course, John's Successors weaseled around the Christian obligations of the Christian Crown, created new offices and new crowns for themselves in the international jurisdiction of the sea and the global jurisdiction of the air --- which they have used to promulgate war and every kind of evil, simply by evading the Christian Crown and it's constitutional obligations ever since the reign of Queen Anne in the early 1700's.

We detailed the surreptitious abdication of Elizabeth II as described in Regina v. JAH (John Anthony Hill) and also the recent "coronation" of Charles III that bypassed the Christian Crown and ceremony entirely.

The Church has pulled similar evasions by operating under the pagan Office of the Roman Pontiff instead of the ministerial office of the Bishop of Rome.

This corruption and evasion and pretense has so far contributed to political and social and cultural decay that we have lawless governmental service corporations merely acting "as" governments engaged in wars for profit, illegal occupation of independent countries, and franchise corporations used to impersonate living people and trample the natural rights of living men, destroying the order of creation and the natural resources of the Earth --- all under the supposed authority of a substituted and foreign crown, exercised by a mere agent of the Pope and Popes operating as Roman Pontiffs.

As we've seen, the Crown of England is completely legless unless operated by the actual owner of the Commonwealth lands, the Pope, and they do not constitute a kingdom, but are rather a gift estate that was later included in the Aeterni Regis Trust.

Now, we are additionally treated to the spectacle of this landless, legless "authority" undermining the lives and biology and genetic integrity of billions of people throughout the world.

The Templars, exorcised from the Church under the demand of Pope Clement V for their obedience, have been the agents of the "Secular Church" run by the Roman Pontiff out of the Inner City of London since the 1100's when all of this, and -- not coincidentally, the collection of the "income tax" to pay for Crusades and the whole insanity of killing for Jesus began -- while the Knights of Malta have been the "left hand" of the Order and supplied the interlocking trust directorates and military coordination -- still appearing, like the "right hand" Hospitaliers, to be within the Church.

It is all a bunch of venal self-interested fraud by business interests seducing the Church; and, all having no more foundation in spiritual law or any other kind of law, than the distribution of confetti thrown into a rising wind.

No wonder Pope Benedict XVI was so anxious to dissolve the Romanus Pontifex land trust and distribute its assets to his tribal cronies, and also anxious to dissolve the Office of the Roman Pontiff as of 2011.

No wonder, either, that the loyal Jesuit Bergolio was ordered to undertake the functions of the Office of the Roman Pontiff while wearing the vestments and name of "Pope Francis" and at the same time, the Christian and ministerial Office of the Bishop of Rome was retained by Benedict XVI and taken to his grave, so as to very quietly and permanently bury it.

We are not deceived. The Archbishops and Cardinals and members of the Roman Curia cannot claim ignorance, either.

We know why King Charles III is no lawful King of England, and cannot be, just as his Mother, Elizabeth II was never a lawful Queen, and was instead obliged to sit on the Chair of the Estates.

We also know why Pope Francis is no Pope and not the Bishop of Rome and not acting in any Christian Office or capacity at all.

Finally, we know why we are not bound by any of this nonsense, and why those who subscribe to it are by definition either victims or criminals.

This criminality was brought to us all by that Old Deceiver, that two-headed Snake cast down upon us ages ago, known as Imagination and Belief -- which William the Conqueror defeated with flat-footed acumen.

Just as Edward the Confessor confessed the truth that William of Normandy was the right-wise King of England, William the Conqueror didn't conquer by armed might alone, but by knowledge of land law and his own lineage, and by shrewd calculation of the nature of men.

William knew and we should know that our base nature is never owned, but only guided, that the physical world is passing through our hands, but the spirit is everlasting, with virtue and vice entwined until the final conquest.

William trusted the greed and arrogance of his nobles to enforce one against the other, and their mutual self-interest to eventually breed peace in England -- a country that has been at war within itself and in the world abroad long before the days of Julius Caesar.

It is to William's shrewdness and to Natural Law that we owe our victories in this Apocalypse, and which allows us to forestall any further consequence. We are not bound to relive history that we have not forgotten, nor have we forgotten who and what we are; we simply slumbered for a time, and are now awake.

Awaken, men and women, to the idiocy of the beliefs being foisted upon you, which lead you to imagine that you are a name, that you are in the presence of overpopulation in the midst of a population collapse, and that a harmless natural gas is responsible for ongoing environmental catastrophes caused by malice and avarice.

Or worse, lead you to believe that contracts apply to babies in their cradles, and that the debts of dead things accrue to living men, and that Express Trusts can be redefined or overcome by ignorance and prejudice.

This and much else people have believed in, and subscribed to, is nothing more or less than lies and webs of purposeful deceit--- phantoms of imagination akin to nightmares which must come to rest and be dismissed like shadows fleeing the rising day.

The sovereignty of England is not vested in a Papal Crown of any sort; and insomuch as a portion of the government of England has been allowed to the Christian Crown, that government failed upon its abdication, over 300 years ago.

Whereupon, we Americans issued the default and declared our own sovereignty and issued our Sovereign Letters Patent, effective November 4th 2015, with no objection from Pope Francis or the then-Queen, as they did not and cannot inhabit our jurisdictions, and must fall silent as things come before the Living God owed all actual, natural, and general jurisdiction.

We have established our lineage and provenance and evidence of our blood and have recorded and published our claim in public and in private via Ecclesiastical Deed Poll; we have placed liens in the air, on the sea, and on the land upon all the Guilty Parties and their charters and franchises; we have claimed all their debts and interest as our credit; all their systems of weights and measures, money and currency, surveys and inventories, taxes and tariffs, all apparatus of the so-called corporate governments, as owed to us, the living, and similar to our ancestor, William of Normandy, we have established our Express Trusts both Public and private to contain these assets and ultimately distribute them back to the rightful owners -- the living people and their lawful governments.

Most recently, we have moved to foreclose upon these cured claims and liens, and served Notice at the highest levels of our action.

It is our understanding that the land and soil of England has been preserved by similar claims entered by Ivan Talbot, the Hereditary Lord High Steward of England, and the land and soil of Germany -- that area defined as Germany prior to World War I -- including but not limited to what is now Germany and Poland, has been preserved and bequeathed to the living people of these countries by claims entered on their behalf by Prince Friedrich of the Kingdom of Prussia just before his untimely death. All other assets lawfully and legally belonging to these and other countries which we have claimed or entered double-claims upon, are to be returned to the living people and to the administration of their lawful governments as soon as these governments are organized and able to administer their assets and affairs.

Until then, they remain under our care.

Throughout this long struggle of truth against lies and fact against fiction, there have been many good people sacrificed to the unliving and unnatural "gods" of Mammon, Molloch, and Baal -- which are, in the end, creatures of imagination, bereft of any power we have not given them.

We are united in our awakened state and empowered by the force of life itself to declare and dismiss the falsehood under which we have labored and the deceit that has been used to entrap, enslave, and defraud generations of men upon the Earth.

We declare, we proclaim, and we insist that our nature as living men and women stands above all idols, all offices, all political distinctions, all merely imagined things; that we have and we hold and we claim and we possess, severally and together, everything of value that we are and which exists as a natural or man-made or human-constructed resource of this Earth --- and nothing we have created in any jurisdiction or capacity whatsoever stands above us.

We are the value invested in all things, the consciousness gifted and enlivened by love to manifest the truth and to give meaning to the physical reality, to husband the Earth, to experience the depth and breadth and height of all existence within temporal reality.

We pledge nothing to dead things, to offices we have created ourselves, to conventions we have hitherto allowed, to obedience we never owed, to scraps of cloth that we ourselves endowed, to laws we did not espouse and which were not imposed on us by creation itself, but were invented by deluded and tormented souls alienated from themselves and from the Earth and from us as well.

Into the Abyss of Errors, Mistakes, Sins, Deceits, Lies, False Powers, False Identities, and False Claims made by False Things and False Offices, we consign the acts of impersonation and acts of manipulation and acts of legislation that have been used to harm all living beings and force war upon the Earth.

Ours is a shared and common destiny of love, abundance, freedom and compassion, one in which the common good underlies the good of each one of us, and the good of each one of us underlies the common good in return, in an endless cycle of giving and receiving that cannot be measured or quantified, reduced to territories or mere symbols of value.

We refuse, we disallow, we do not grant nor delegate any power to anyone or to any thing to monetize our living flesh nor to establish estimates upon it except for damages to the whole that together we create, which is apart from any true value being claimed, for the true value of a man's energy and life and inspiration are unknown and are gifts to him alone; likewise, we do not allow nor grant nor delegate any power to place a value on our time on Earth, to tax our energy, to govern our minds, to force our performance of any public duty apart from not harming others and not harming their property, to enfranchise us as corporations, to abuse us as objects, to separate us from mankind, to pollute or alter our genome, to in any way, shape, form, or in any jurisdiction intrude upon our rightful peace, to trespass on our property, to confiscate or entrust our assets, to offer to contract with us without full disclosure, to assume any contract, or enforce any contract lacking any of the seven (7) elements of lawful contracts, or to in any other way impose upon us via unlawful bills of attainder, unlawful powers of arrest, unlawful claims of war powers, or any other merely legal claim of contract, interest, or enforceable right against us.

To ourselves and our principles we remain true, and to the truth we remain aligned; with our mutual and several determinations, we reserve unto ourselves, severally and collectively, all rights, titles, and interest in the gifts we have each received, and we accept our inheritance both public and private, freed of any unjust or unrealistic claim.

We return our gratitude and love, our due diligence and our service, to the true and loving and living God, in consideration of the gifts of life and love and energy and experience and the honest education we have received.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

The Right and Duty
By Anna Von Reitz


This morning I wish to draw everyone's attention to the situation in Britain -- which is falling apart by the hour.

We long ago observed that it is factually impossible for a King of England to exist. This is because William the Conqueror divided up the spoils from the Norman Conquest among his loyal Barons, and disinherited his own sons from owning any land in England.

Thus, ever since, the land and soil of England has been ruled by the progeny of French aristocrats, each one of whom enjoys "sovereignty in their own right" on the land and soil bequeathed to them by William of Normandy as of 1087 A.D.

This is called the Settlement of the Norman Conquest.

The Norman French Barons settled in as the new "kings" of England, took on the local color, and within a couple generations started looking and sounding like Englishmen -- except for their French names, like Neville, Tousignant, Belcher, Plantagenet, Dumont, ....and....Talbot.

The Talbots were loyal retainers in Normandy and remained so throughout all of William's adventures and all that his sons and grandsons weathered. The Talbots slogged through the Crusades with Richard the Lionheart, stood guard and took arms at Crecy, and manned the ramparts at Agincourt.

The Talbots served so well, so valiantly, and so loyally, that they were promoted to the position of Ultimate Trust: they became the Lord High Stewards of England, a position that they own to this day, even though the present Lord High Steward and Heir to his ancestral lands in Shrewsbury, happens to be living in Australia.

Understand that each one of these men are -- within the context of their ancestral holdings -- kings of England. They elected among themselves a "king of kings" in each generation, but that was more of an administrative accommodation ---as demonstrated by The Magna Carta.

If they didn't like what "the" King was doing, they retained the right, as a group, to kick his arse. They still retain that right, down through all the generations of the Kings and Queens of England --- a fact that the office holders have always chafed against and sought to evade.

Now, with this background firmly in place in your minds, you can see why the creation of a new Office for the "king of kings" to occupy was highly desired in some quarters, and you will note that this was accomplished in 1707, when the combined Kingdom of England and Scotland, came into existence.

Though the office holder could still function as the King of England and be somewhat subject to the other "kings of England" in that office, he could now also function as the King of England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales and obtain considerable weasel room by doing so. A separate degree of power was obtained by the office holder, simply by changing the jurisdiction of his office.

The office, "King of England" is a national office tied to the soil of England; the office "King of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales" is an international office tied to the land and sea jurisdictions of these nations, and finally, "King of the United Kingdom" is a global, imperial office operated in the jurisdiction of the air.

Though we constantly hear the national and international offices referenced, the office holder isn't occupying these offices.

Elizabeth II, for example, abdicated her vows under the Christian Crown of England within three days of her Coronation -- a fact established in the British High Courts under litigation -- and instead spent her time operating as the Queen of the United Kingdom.

Her son, Charles III, didn't even bother to take the Christian Coronation vows and was directly crowned under the Imperial United Kingdom office.

Try to keep this background information perking away as we move the "American Raj Conversation" to Britain, because as I have long said, the British people have suffered as long as the rest of us. The same rogue Raj elements of their own government have been used to pillage and subourne them, too.

When we examine things more closely, we see that the same exact process of impersonation and alienation of assets was used in Britain, and it developed in tandem with the English King becoming first the "King of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales", and then still later assuming the foreign Imperial Office as the "King of the United Kingdom".

As the office holder acting as "king of kings" successively moved their office from the soil (England) to the land and sea (England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales) and to the air (United Kingdom) his empowerment changed and so did the character of government, the form of law, and the social contract.

With each change in the jurisdiction being occupied, the former jurisdiction was vacated.

Thus, when the King changed offices and stopped acting as the Christian King of England, the soil jurisdiction was vacated.

When he stopped operating as the King of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales, the international jurisdiction of the land and sea was vacated.

The present Lord High Steward, Ivan Talbot, was aware that the land and soil of England were being vacated and that the associated High Offices were also left dangerously unoccupied --- whereupon he exercised his right and duty and reclaimed the land and soil that the late Queen abandoned and which the present King never entered upon.

Please note that it is his right to do this, as Hereditary Lord High Steward, and that it is also his duty; if he did not do it, he would be guilty of treason against the lawful government of England as well as the Territorial Government of England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales.

This is similar to the situation we encountered in America, where the land and soil jurisdictions had been vacated without any public disclosure --- a circumstance that forced the Hereditary Head of State to reclaim the land and soil for the people of this country, too.

Technically, Queen Elizabeth II was "absent" from the English throne for 70 years and never properly occupied it; her Son has similarly remained absent from the soil of England and the land of England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. They have only appeared to be present, much as our government appeared to be present --- and wasn't.

The motivation for this ruse appears to have been a combination of greed, power-mongering, and evasion of accountability.

While the office holder gained wealth, arbitrary power, and bore no liability, the people lost their rights and property and the "other" kings of England were undermined and unable to exert their powers of restraint against a Monarch who had slipped the leash of shared sovereignty on the land and soil.

As a result of all this undisclosed finagling, Constitutional Monarchy disappeared during the reign of the late Queen's Father, and all that remained of it was a shell built of the people's trust and belief that it existed.

Like us, the people of England, and within the realm of Territorial powers, the people of England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, were duped, preyed upon, and deprived of their rights and property by the Windsors and their Parliamentary Administrations.

Of course, some members of the Parliament had to know what was going on, especially members of the Privy Council, but apparently, their devotion to the office holder blinded them to their duty to the office and to the actual government and the social contract holding it all together.

Luckily for the people of England, and the People of England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, the Talbots were no shirkers or fools, and did their duty even when nobody else did. As a result, their Lord High Steward, Ivan Talbot, entered the appropriate claims and charges in a timely fashion and cured them nearly thirty years ago.

Talbot's claims, like our claims for The United States, prevent any wholesale disposition of the land and soil of the British homeland and Territorial holdings as abandoned property, and pave the way for recoupment and action against the corporations which have aimed at establishing a form of Corporate Feudalism and despotism in place of the Constitutional Monarchy that the people are owed.

Against all odds, by the grace of God, our nations have been pulled back from the edge of a dystopian nightmare -- by the actions of two faithful but relatively unknown servants and guardians of their social contracts.

As you are enjoying this Christmas season and looking forward to the clean, bright New Year ahead, take a moment to bless the accretion of traditions, customs, and safeguards built into our venerable governments, and thank God that those little-known safeguards have held steady in the face of one of the most duplicitous, evil, and secretive plots at the very highest levels of our governments -- that our governments have ever faced.

If the Corporatists had been successful, our entire world would have been plunged into a maze of lies, wars, and confusions designed to enhance the powers of faceless, nameless, and unaccountable corporations, bent on promoting their own profit above any social benefit or good.

People would have been enslaved and cultures uprooted, religions would have been disgraced, and wisdom which has guided mankind for centuries would have been lost. The entire ethos of compassion would have been crushed under the wheels of commerce.

You have been saved from all of that. Give thanks.
Let the miracles of this season renew your minds and hearts.

And please, if you are from Great Britain, take a little time to visit Ivan Talbot's new YouTube channel; the videos posted will give you a recap and insight into his actions, his authority for those actions, and where things stand right now for the people of England and Great Britain.

Do not be dismayed -- what is true will win over what is false, and what is good will triumph over evil.

----------------------------

See this article and over 4500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

On Sovereignty
By Anna Von Reitz


I recently brought attention to many excerpts from the United States Supreme Court concerning the topic of sovereignty ---which we published more than eight years ago in "You Know Something's Wrong When....An American Affidavit of Probable Cause".

These quotes about sovereignty from the United States Supreme Court were selected to provide you with the definition of sovereignty, key cases that demonstrated the exercise of sovereignty, and what you are owed in terms of sovereignty as an American.

This is a horse's mouth testimony from expert witnesses about the meaning, nature, and operation of sovereignty in this country, but if you would rather believe uneducated pundits, that's up to you.

Besides drawing your attention to the Supreme Court definitions and prior decisions, we wish to clear up some additional rife misconceptions about the topic of sovereignty.

Your sovereignty does not depend upon nor issue from any Constitution or institution. It is a gift to you from Nature and Nature's God, part of your unalienable character.

We have noted elsewhere, however, that the World created by Mankind is a separate and lesser creation than the Earth.

It should not surprise anyone that the sovereignty that is built into you by Nature, is a different kind of sovereignty than the quagmire of Sovereigns -- Kings and Queens and Potentates -- created by Mankind

Yet, even in this lesser and undesirable worldly creation, we nonetheless have our Sovereignty intact. This form of Sovereignty that is created by men, derives its power from institutions that are also created by men.

This worldly version of Sovereignty related to this country was won by the Force of Arms when we won The War of Independence, and it was settled upon this nation by William Belcher, a Colonel in the Continental Army.

William Belcher was The Belle Cher of his generation, the Clan Chief, born and raised in this country. He inherited Sovereignty in his own right in England as a result of the Norman Settlement, which granted each of the Norman Barons sovereignty in their own right and their own kingdom in England.

The Norman Barons and their progeny were and are the rightful rulers of England and the Donors to the 1689 Trust; if King John's progeny mess things up, the progeny of the Norman Barons are enabled (and required) to dissolve the Trust creating Great Britain.

The Hereditary Lord High Steward, Lord Talbot, has declared a Regency which is a first step toward that eventuality.

When the time came for the same circumstance to present itself in America, William Belcher stepped forward and bequeathed sovereignty in their own right to every American who fought in The War of Independence, and to every American who would be born on our land and soil forever after.

As in England nearly 700 years before, the Victory by Force of Arms here had the same effect as the Settlement of the Norman Conquest, only here, every man was made a king and every plot of land a kingdom, not just a fistful of Barons.

It was the same exact circumstance as the Norman Conquest, and William Belcher quickly ascertained that he was in Possession of the Victory, and like his own ancestral Benefactor, he was enabled to "share sovereignty". So he did.

George III's Sovereignty was forever alienated and displaced by the Sovereignty of William of Normandy and his Heirs in England, the Belle Chers. The only scrap left for George III was a Territorial trusteeship on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways, and a ten percent tribute interest in any gold that was mined.

Imagine my amazement when someone suggested that my husband, James Belcher, "granted sovereignty" to anyone?

How would that be?

Every Continental Army Soldier and Navy Sailor, and everyone born in this country ever since the War of Independence ended, already has their sovereignty, first from Nature and Nature's God, and second, ultimately, from William of Normandy.

There has also been a pernicious misunderstanding mistaking the name "Belcher" as an English Surname. It is not used as such. Belcher is merely the English transliteration of Belle Cher, the name of our Clan. My husband does not use a Surname as such, and if he did, it wouldn't be Belcher.

Just as the Clan MacGregor has a Clan Chieftain known as "The MacGregor", the Belchers aka Belle Chers have a Clan Chieftain known as The Belle Cher. Unlike the Scots Clans, however, that submitted to the rule of King John and his Heirs, the French Clan Belle Cher never did any such thing.

King John was one of theirs.

So we always had our equal or better standing than King John and his Heirs in England. That's why the Magna Carta still stands.

That's why the British Monarch and the denizens of Westminster and the Holy See are all being called to account. It's the reason for The Declaration of the Flag.

It's the reason Lord Talbot is owed the Regency for England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales.

Just because we haven't spoken for a long time, doesn't mean that we are dead, or that our contracts have lost their teeth.

Every single President from George Washington to Joe Biden, except for Donald Trump, have been related to King John, the same Overseer of the Church's Commonwealth lands, still attached to the service of Pope Innocent III and his Successors,

All the "Presidents" are Plantagenets in violation of the Conventions, Treaties, and Constitutions owed to this country, all acting in hidden conflict of interest.

My husband's role is not to grant sovereignty to anyone, much less Sovereignty that Americans have already earned and which they received over 200 years ago.

His role is to enforce the Sovereignty of this country and hold everyone, including the Plantagenets, accountable for their bad faith.

Just as your rights are not created by nor granted to you by any Constitution, but are instead guaranteed by the Federal Constitutions -- a different concept entirely --- your Sovereignty is not granted, it's shared.

Ironically, for all the grandstanding the Brits make about liberty and freedom and constitutional government, you can thank William the Conqueror for sharing his Sovereignty with his Barons, and you can thank his Barons for sharing their Sovereignty with you.

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

The Crux of the Matter
By Anna Von Reitz


This translates as "the Cross of the Matter" --- precisely the cross that Yeshuah was made to bear, and this single small verse is that one that of all verses in the Bible encapsulates the error that has haunted mankind and ruined our days ever since.

First Samuel 8:5

"And [the people] said unto him, Behold, thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways, now make us a king to judge us like all the nations."
--- King James Version

This is the clan leaders of the people of Israel talking to Samuel, their prophet and High Priest thousands of years ago.

Prior to this time they had placed their trust and leadership in their prophets and their own priests and had no secular kings, which was instead the practice common among their neighbors -- the Egyptians, the Hittites, Babylonians, Assyrians, Canaanites, et alia.

They had placed their trust in Samuel and in his ability to communicate with God, but now that Samuel was nearing the end of his days, they had nobody to take his place. Their entire system of governance had depended on one man, Samuel, and now, they had to figure out something else --- so they elected to do what all the neighbors had done, and have Samuel elect a king to reign over them and "judge" them.

The phrase "judge them" is peculiar and again goes to the heart of the matter. Since Moses gave them the Commandments and then all the 620 lesser laws -- dietary laws, sex laws, contract laws, etc., --- they had been under "judgement". Judgement doesn't exist without Law, because there is no agreed upon standard determining what is right or wrong, allowed or disallowed, within a society.

The Jews had their standards and the Egyptians had their different standards because they all adopted different laws for themselves, and each nation also then had a King to enforce these laws. The Kings, to begin with, were not only law-givers, but law enforcers and judges.

Though we may trust that the tribal leaders had established rules for their people to live by and that a sort of general consensus about these rules existed long prior to Moses, and we may also trust that the coming of the Commandments had further solidified the concept of Law, the election of a King was an entirely new and different matter for the Hebrews.

They had never had a King prior to that.

Prior to that moment, their only King was the living God, and his directives were communicated to them by the prophets.

This is the moment when they kicked God off the throne and allowed it to be occupied by a man. This is when their lack of faith in their own ability to know God became paramount and overwhelmed them.

They thought that they needed Samuel, or someone like Samuel, to act as intermediary between them and God. They didn't believe that it was possible for God to write his law on their own hearts and communicate directly with them.

So, they substituted a man for God, and that was their free will, and they were welcome to it.

Ever since, men have been ruled by the wisdom or folly of other men, and their lives and the lives of their nations have suffered accordingly.

A wise and just ruler brought them justice and plenty. A lazy fool brought the opposite results. A good king could be followed by a sick or profligate son. And so it has been, on and on, with all sorts of different sovereigns, kings and queens, and even an abstraction, "the People", being crowned as the sovereign.

Yet, all of this is a lie and a farce, akin to children playing dress-up, and putting on their parent's garb, pretending that they are grown-ups, too.

A more mature view of this situation was arrived at by William of Normandy in the years after the Norman Conquest, who observed himself to be King, and yet a Fool, subject to Nature, struggling with lust, confusion, and insurmountable burdens.

He also directly observed the carnage and destruction and unhappiness that his rule had wrought in the name of justice, so that even victory turned to ashes in his mouth.

This is an evil system, he decided, one in which a man playing at being King is destroyed by the burdens of kingship, and other men worship him as a False God, and give their lives and their own sovereignty over to him.

And so, we go back to First Samuel, Chapter Eight, Verse 5, where the Mistake was made.

We are born with our own sovereignty, and it is taken away from us almost from the moment of our birth. We are born connected to our Creator, needing no other man or authority standing between us to interpret or judge, but quickly, we are deluded into accepting external authority and the laws of men, which amounts to an external representation of everyone else's conscience--- or lack thereof.

When we again embrace the wisdom and grace to let the Living God be our only King, and ask for our ears to be open only to his Voice, our hearts to answer only to his Conscience, then at last the battle will be won, and we will be able to live as we were created and meant to live.

Ah, but you say, like the Hebrews before you, how can we know -- and be sure -- that we hear the right Voice, and that we are not just following our own ego and prejudice?

First, ask to clearly hear the Voice of your Creator. You will be helped and guided.

Second, can you tell one radio station from another? Aren't there always "station identifications" broadcast?

For example, if you find yourselves in another bloody war promoted in the name of God, it's time to wonder which God? What God?

Third, we now know, for sure, the meaning of the frequencies of the divine broadcast. We know that Love transmits at 528 Hz precisely. This beacon always leads us home. It never leads us astray.

So tune in. Learn to recognize this frequency, and learn how to broadcast it yourself. Yeshuah gave us many lessons to help us do this, and his example, too.

Recently, the topic of the mistreatment of God's Messengers came up. Why do we destroy those sent to help us?

Because we are out of attunement (another transliteration of "atonement") with them.

Why do we splinter off and form so many different religions and follow so many different gurus and prophets?

Because we don't recognize the one Message that is common to them all.

We get distracted by their differences and these differences keep us enthralled, instead of seeing that every true Messenger speaks the same message to us.

All faithful Messengers deliver the same message: love.

Tara Ross - This Day in History: D-Day:

https://www.taraross.com/post/tdih-d-day

#Normandy #DDay #Eisenhower #Victory #WorldWarII #History