Bill Maher: Democrats ‘Had Four Years to Put Trump on Trial’ But They ‘Blew It’ https://www.infowars.com/posts/bill-maher-democrats-had-four-years-to-put-trump-on-trial-but-they-blew-it/

International Public Notice: Virus Fraud
By Anna Von Reitz


We will let Mike Adams say it for us:
"Bombshell news today on the vaccine front as AstraZeneca, after admitting its covid jabs cause fibrous clots, is now withdrawing its covid vaccine from the entire world marketplace.

The EU has now revoked authorization for this vaccine, meaning it is now illegal to administer this jab to anyone in the EU.

Meanwhile, an attempted reinfection trial that exposed volunteers to 10,000 times the "dose" of covid deemed necessary to cause infections failed to produce a single infection. The premise of virology as being capable of causing pandemics is a total fraud. And that means vaccines are a fraud, too."

We could not surpass his brevity or logic.

Contrary to what the perpetually gullible Public has been led to believe, The Virus Theory, also known as The Germ Theory, is, and has always remained a theory with as many bits of evidence against it as for it.

While the introduction of any foreign substance does trigger the immune system and if it is a biological entity or molecule will provoke the creation of specific antibodies, that doesn't really prove anything about the nature of what we have come to call "viruses".

All this does is prove things about the immune system and basic mechanisms of immunity, leaving the more basic issue of the Causative Agent in limbo.

Our scientists assure us that viruses, also called "exosomes" are dead, little pinched off particles of DNA and waste products encapsulated in a protein shell.

Can dead things "infect"? Not really.

Think of waste DNA and RNA as Hazmat and the protein shell of a virus as a specially designed waste container with a lid. The protein shell is not alive, but its contents, the degraded bits of deoxy or ribonucleic acid can still replicate, if they get back inside a cell.

And then what have you got?

You've got bits of polluted and degraded foreign DNA or RNA snippets coding for foreign proteins inside your cells.

Those foreign proteins then hit your system like a sledge hammer and provoke your immune response -- which is then misidentified as a "disease".

It can be any disease, depending on the nature of the DNA or RNA contained in the "virus" packet, and the nature of the resulting immune response to whatever foreign proteins are being produced.

Blood clotting factor snippets of DNA or RNA code result in foreign blood clotting factor proteins and your immune system reacts to them, specifically.

Tumor producing snippets of DNA or RNA code result in foreign tumor proteins and your immune system reacts to them, specifically.

Each set of such stimulus-response reactions is different, so, Astrazeneca's "vaccine" loaded with blood clotting factor snippets of RNA (left over from a Department of Defense Experiment during the Iraq War) leads to "fibrous clots" as the foreign blood clotting factor proteins meet your body's immune response.

Depending on what the "payload" of DNA or RNA snippets are, you exhibit different symptoms and appear to have different diseases.

Our cell walls and membranes naturally work to exclude foreign DNA and RNA and keep this intracellular production of foreign proteins from happening, but thanks to Doctor Fauci and other Mad Scientists --- tech-crazed men with no actual brains or hearts --- this natural barrier has purportedly been overcome.

To our universal detriment.

We are calling for an immediate full stop and end of production and injection of all DNA and RNA "vaccines" worldwide.

We are calling for the prosecution and public punishment of all the Corporations responsible for this genocidal crime against humanity, and in the case of this country, the prosecution of the US CONGRESS and its Members, which recklessly and in gross negligence and dereliction of duty agreed to accept the liability for vaccine manufacturers.

Let them have the liability for all this expense and disruption and death -- individually, personally, and with 100% commercial liability.

And may no bank dare to give them as much as a peso of our credit. They were not acting "for" us or in our favor when they did this, and they do not deserve any indemnification or insurance at public cost.

The UN CORPORATION has promoted war instead of stopping it, and has contributed to this genocide through its WHO organization. We see no reason for its continued existence, much less any treaty empowering it in any way.

We call for the immediate liquidation of the UN CORPORATION and WHO, both, and an end to any further discussion of a sea "treaty" among the guilty corporations to grant any purported powers possessed by any corporation to either entity.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

https://politicalsignal.com/major-twist-emerges-from-trump-trial/

BY CONSERVATIVE PATRIOTS — MAY 9, 2024
Supreme Court Reaches Huge Decision – Trump WINS!


According to a political commentator, Donald Trump's legal team can find satisfaction in the outcome of their argument regarding presidential immunity before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Ronald Brownstein, a senior editor at The Atlantic, penned an article titled "Trump Is Getting What He Wants," which concludes that the former president is unlikely to face legal proceedings in federal courts before the November election.

"Political analyst Ron Brownstein's recent piece in The Atlantic delves into the Supreme Court's influence on Trump's future and the presidency's future...let's delve into that. Ron, because following yesterday's Supreme Court hearings, you've concluded that Trump is getting what he wants and more, how and why," inquired host Kate Bolduan.
"Well, practically speaking, in the immediate future, what he's gaining is, we're somewhat becoming desensitized to this, but during that hearing yesterday, five of the Republican-appointed justices, nearly all except Amy Coney Barrett, sent clear signals that they intend to shield the Republican presidential nominee from a trial before the November election on charges that, as polls indicate, are deemed most serious by the American people," asserted Brownstein.

"In practical terms, almost any of the potential rulings from that hearing will make it exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, to hold a trial regarding whether Trump attempted to undermine the last election before facing voters in the upcoming election," he added.
"The ramifications for his potential reelection may be even more significant. You witnessed in that hearing how expansive their interpretation of presidential authority is," he continued. "His lawyers argued that unless he was first impeached and convicted, a scenario implausible in the current partisan climate, he could engage in activities such as selling nuclear secrets, assassinating a political opponent, or even orchestrating a coup without being subject to criminal trials. Legal experts I consulted highlighted that when dealing with someone who holds such a broad perception of presidential power, attempting to delineate precisely what can or cannot be prosecuted after leaving office is essentially futile.
Concluding his remarks, he emphasized: "He will likely perceive almost any form of immunity as a license to push the boundaries further, and because of that, you wrote this: those entering the hearing hoping to preserve the possibility of a pre-election trial against Trump exit the proceedings merely hoping that the court doesn't obliterate the chance of legal consequences for any president who violates the law."

WATCH: CNN LEGAL ANALYST MOCKS STORMY DANIELS’ ‘DISASTROUS’ TESTIMONY
Daphne Moon May 9, 2024 0 1 min read
CNN legal analyst Elie Honig strongly criticized the recent developments in the trial against former President Donald Trump, saying that the testimony of porn star Stormy Daniels was “disastrous” for the prosecution’s case. Honig argued that the cross-examination by Trump’s attorneys went poorly for Democratic Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

Honig highlighted Daniels’ responses to questions from Trump’s attorneys, stating that they were “disastrous” for the prosecution. He pointed out that when the witness openly expresses hatred towards the person whose liberty is at stake, it significantly undermines their credibility. In this case, Daniels has made public statements and tweets expressing her dislike for Trump and even fantasizing about him being in jail. This, according to Honig, is a significant red flag and raises doubts about her reliability as a witness.
Moreover, Honig also noted other pertinent issues that emerged from the cross-examination of Daniels, including her outstanding debt of $500,000 to Trump and her defiance of a court order to pay it. He argued that this could also be used by the defense team to discredit her testimony and question her integrity. If Daniels is willing to defy a court order, why should she be trusted to uphold the oath she took in court?
On further examination, it seems that the cross-examination by Trump’s attorneys is making significant inroads in the case. While Daniels’ direct testimony may have initially seemed beneficial for the prosecution, the defense has effectively challenged her credibility and raised doubts about her reliability as a witness. Honig admitted that at the end of the direct examination, it seemed like the prosecution had gotten what they needed. However, the cross-examination has seemingly turned the tide in Trump’s favor.
The trial, led by Democratic Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, has indicted Trump on 34 felony counts related to the alleged falsification of business records regarding a $130,000 payout to porn star Stormy Daniels in 2016. However, with the current developments in the courtroom, it seems that the prosecution’s case is crumbling. Honig himself admitted that the cross-examination was a “big damn deal” for the prosecution, as Daniels’ responses have severely damaged her credibility as a witness.