MYSTERIOUS DEATH OF JAN. 6 DEFENDANT LEAVES THE WORLD QUESTIONING THE FBI’S TACTICS
Daphne Moon May 15, 2024 0 2 min read

Homol was first identified as a criminal suspect by the Department of Justice in late 2020, when his younger half-brother, Dillon Homol, was charged with misdemeanors related to the Capitol incursion. He was then called as a witness by the defense, but the FBI pursued him for prosecution instead. This aggressive pursuit was highlighted on social media by the bureau’s Washington office, which bragged about his arrest.
Homol was charged with felony counts of obstruction of an official proceeding, civil disorder, and assaulting, resisting, or impeding police. He was also charged with several misdemeanor offenses, including knowingly entering or remaining in a restricted building or grounds without lawful authority, disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds, engaging in physical violence in a restricted building or grounds, disorderly conduct in a Capitol building, and an act of physical violence on Capitol grounds.

LIFE IN PRISON , REMOVE CITIZENSHIPS FOR ALL CORRUPT LAWYERS,,,DA,,,AG,,,AGAINST TRUMP..,,DEPORT THERE FAMILIES, ,.CHECK TAX RETURNS, BANKS ACCTS..,BRIBES ARE FELONY,,,INJUSTICE EXPOSED: ETHICS COMPLAINT CALLS FOR DISCIPLINE AGAINST SPECIAL COUNSEL IN TRUMP CASES
Daphne Moon May 1, 2024 1 1 min read

ShareTweetFlipboardEmail
A formal ethics complaint was lodged against Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith on Tuesday, alleging that he is engaging in blatant election interference through his prosecution of former President Donald Trump.
The complaint was filed by Elise Stefanik, a Republican Congresswoman from New York and the chair of the House GOP conference. Stefanik accused Smith of serious ethics violations and called for disciplinary action to be taken against him.

In her official complaint to the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility, Stefanik claimed that Smith has engaged in egregious misconduct by pursuing criminal charges against Trump. Smith is currently overseeing two federal cases against the former president, claiming that he committed election interference while challenging the results of the 2020 presidential election and mishandled classified documents.
Stefanik argued that these cases are a clear attempt by Smith to interfere with the 2024 election and prevent Trump from potentially running for president again. She stated that it is obvious to any reasonable observer that Smith is motivated by personal bias and is breaching DOJ policies in his pursuit of Trump.

The congresswoman highlighted that Smith’s repeated attempts to expedite the federal case against Trump fly in the face of long-standing Justice Department policy. She also accused him of violating a stay of proceedings ordered by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Stefanik argued that this behavior is a clear breach of trial ethics and a violation of lawyerly conduct.
Stefanik also referenced several legal motions filed by Smith in the wake of the US Supreme Court’s decision to review Trump’s claims of presidential immunity for some of the charges he faces. She stated that pursuing legal action during a stay of proceedings is a blatant example of misconduct and should be investigated by the Office of Professional Responsibility.

Stefanik concluded her complaint by emphasizing that Smith’s actions have brought disrepute to the DOJ and the federal government as a whole. She urged the office to open an investigation and hold Smith accountable for his actions.
The complaint cites multiple violations of DOJ policies and a breach of trial ethics, as well as personal bias on the part of Smith. The congresswoman responsible for filing the complaint has called for disciplinary action to be taken against Smith and has requested an immediate investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility. It remains to be seen what actions will be taken in response to this complaint and if it will have any impact on the ongoing legal cases against former President Trump.

Monday, May 13th, 2024

Beware of the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act
Lew Rockwell

Thoughts on Russia
Jane Ten Brink

Next Up, Realism!
Karen Kwiatkowski

Gaza
Keith Preston

US Taxpayers Paying For Israel & MAGA’s Have Been Trumped
Helena Glass

Using a Fictional Antisemitism Crisis To Support a Real Genocide
Caitlin Johnstone

Feminists Silent as Germany Allows Gang Rapes and Prosecution of Women for Speaking Out
Vladek Filler

Can a Country as Far Gone as America Recover?
Paul Craig Roberts

Gold’s Action Last Week Strongly Points to China
Alasdair Macleod

9 Most Dangerous Cities in the US
Madge Waggy

Pro War and Pro Life
Francis Christian

Beyond Medicine: ‘Being Mortal’ Challenges Healthcare’s Approach to Death and Dying
Dr. Joseph Mercola

https://www.lewrockwell.com

International Public Notice: Virus Fraud
By Anna Von Reitz


We will let Mike Adams say it for us:
"Bombshell news today on the vaccine front as AstraZeneca, after admitting its covid jabs cause fibrous clots, is now withdrawing its covid vaccine from the entire world marketplace.

The EU has now revoked authorization for this vaccine, meaning it is now illegal to administer this jab to anyone in the EU.

Meanwhile, an attempted reinfection trial that exposed volunteers to 10,000 times the "dose" of covid deemed necessary to cause infections failed to produce a single infection. The premise of virology as being capable of causing pandemics is a total fraud. And that means vaccines are a fraud, too."

We could not surpass his brevity or logic.

Contrary to what the perpetually gullible Public has been led to believe, The Virus Theory, also known as The Germ Theory, is, and has always remained a theory with as many bits of evidence against it as for it.

While the introduction of any foreign substance does trigger the immune system and if it is a biological entity or molecule will provoke the creation of specific antibodies, that doesn't really prove anything about the nature of what we have come to call "viruses".

All this does is prove things about the immune system and basic mechanisms of immunity, leaving the more basic issue of the Causative Agent in limbo.

Our scientists assure us that viruses, also called "exosomes" are dead, little pinched off particles of DNA and waste products encapsulated in a protein shell.

Can dead things "infect"? Not really.

Think of waste DNA and RNA as Hazmat and the protein shell of a virus as a specially designed waste container with a lid. The protein shell is not alive, but its contents, the degraded bits of deoxy or ribonucleic acid can still replicate, if they get back inside a cell.

And then what have you got?

You've got bits of polluted and degraded foreign DNA or RNA snippets coding for foreign proteins inside your cells.

Those foreign proteins then hit your system like a sledge hammer and provoke your immune response -- which is then misidentified as a "disease".

It can be any disease, depending on the nature of the DNA or RNA contained in the "virus" packet, and the nature of the resulting immune response to whatever foreign proteins are being produced.

Blood clotting factor snippets of DNA or RNA code result in foreign blood clotting factor proteins and your immune system reacts to them, specifically.

Tumor producing snippets of DNA or RNA code result in foreign tumor proteins and your immune system reacts to them, specifically.

Each set of such stimulus-response reactions is different, so, Astrazeneca's "vaccine" loaded with blood clotting factor snippets of RNA (left over from a Department of Defense Experiment during the Iraq War) leads to "fibrous clots" as the foreign blood clotting factor proteins meet your body's immune response.

Depending on what the "payload" of DNA or RNA snippets are, you exhibit different symptoms and appear to have different diseases.

Our cell walls and membranes naturally work to exclude foreign DNA and RNA and keep this intracellular production of foreign proteins from happening, but thanks to Doctor Fauci and other Mad Scientists --- tech-crazed men with no actual brains or hearts --- this natural barrier has purportedly been overcome.

To our universal detriment.

We are calling for an immediate full stop and end of production and injection of all DNA and RNA "vaccines" worldwide.

We are calling for the prosecution and public punishment of all the Corporations responsible for this genocidal crime against humanity, and in the case of this country, the prosecution of the US CONGRESS and its Members, which recklessly and in gross negligence and dereliction of duty agreed to accept the liability for vaccine manufacturers.

Let them have the liability for all this expense and disruption and death -- individually, personally, and with 100% commercial liability.

And may no bank dare to give them as much as a peso of our credit. They were not acting "for" us or in our favor when they did this, and they do not deserve any indemnification or insurance at public cost.

The UN CORPORATION has promoted war instead of stopping it, and has contributed to this genocide through its WHO organization. We see no reason for its continued existence, much less any treaty empowering it in any way.

We call for the immediate liquidation of the UN CORPORATION and WHO, both, and an end to any further discussion of a sea "treaty" among the guilty corporations to grant any purported powers possessed by any corporation to either entity.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

WATCH: CNN LEGAL ANALYST MOCKS STORMY DANIELS’ ‘DISASTROUS’ TESTIMONY
Daphne Moon May 9, 2024 0 1 min read
CNN legal analyst Elie Honig strongly criticized the recent developments in the trial against former President Donald Trump, saying that the testimony of porn star Stormy Daniels was “disastrous” for the prosecution’s case. Honig argued that the cross-examination by Trump’s attorneys went poorly for Democratic Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

Honig highlighted Daniels’ responses to questions from Trump’s attorneys, stating that they were “disastrous” for the prosecution. He pointed out that when the witness openly expresses hatred towards the person whose liberty is at stake, it significantly undermines their credibility. In this case, Daniels has made public statements and tweets expressing her dislike for Trump and even fantasizing about him being in jail. This, according to Honig, is a significant red flag and raises doubts about her reliability as a witness.
Moreover, Honig also noted other pertinent issues that emerged from the cross-examination of Daniels, including her outstanding debt of $500,000 to Trump and her defiance of a court order to pay it. He argued that this could also be used by the defense team to discredit her testimony and question her integrity. If Daniels is willing to defy a court order, why should she be trusted to uphold the oath she took in court?
On further examination, it seems that the cross-examination by Trump’s attorneys is making significant inroads in the case. While Daniels’ direct testimony may have initially seemed beneficial for the prosecution, the defense has effectively challenged her credibility and raised doubts about her reliability as a witness. Honig admitted that at the end of the direct examination, it seemed like the prosecution had gotten what they needed. However, the cross-examination has seemingly turned the tide in Trump’s favor.
The trial, led by Democratic Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, has indicted Trump on 34 felony counts related to the alleged falsification of business records regarding a $130,000 payout to porn star Stormy Daniels in 2016. However, with the current developments in the courtroom, it seems that the prosecution’s case is crumbling. Honig himself admitted that the cross-examination was a “big damn deal” for the prosecution, as Daniels’ responses have severely damaged her credibility as a witness.