People

Sorry, no results were found.

Circles

Sorry, no results were found.

Posts

05/13/2024

LIFE IN PRISON , REMOVE CITIZENSHIPS FOR ALL CORRUPT LAWYERS,,,DA,,,AG,,,AGAINST TRUMP..,,DEPORT THERE FAMILIES, ,.CHECK TAX RETURNS, BANKS ACCTS..,BRIBES ARE FELONY,,,INJUSTICE EXPOSED: ETHICS COMPLAINT CALLS FOR DISCIPLINE AGAINST SPECIAL COUNSEL IN TRUMP CASES
Daphne Moon May 1, 2024 1 1 min read

ShareTweetFlipboardEmail
A formal ethics complaint was lodged against Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith on Tuesday, alleging that he is engaging in blatant election interference through his prosecution of former President Donald Trump.
The complaint was filed by Elise Stefanik, a Republican Congresswoman from New York and the chair of the House GOP conference. Stefanik accused Smith of serious ethics violations and called for disciplinary action to be taken against him.

In her official complaint to the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility, Stefanik claimed that Smith has engaged in egregious misconduct by pursuing criminal charges against Trump. Smith is currently overseeing two federal cases against the former president, claiming that he committed election interference while challenging the results of the 2020 presidential election and mishandled classified documents.
Stefanik argued that these cases are a clear attempt by Smith to interfere with the 2024 election and prevent Trump from potentially running for president again. She stated that it is obvious to any reasonable observer that Smith is motivated by personal bias and is breaching DOJ policies in his pursuit of Trump.

The congresswoman highlighted that Smith’s repeated attempts to expedite the federal case against Trump fly in the face of long-standing Justice Department policy. She also accused him of violating a stay of proceedings ordered by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Stefanik argued that this behavior is a clear breach of trial ethics and a violation of lawyerly conduct.
Stefanik also referenced several legal motions filed by Smith in the wake of the US Supreme Court’s decision to review Trump’s claims of presidential immunity for some of the charges he faces. She stated that pursuing legal action during a stay of proceedings is a blatant example of misconduct and should be investigated by the Office of Professional Responsibility.

Stefanik concluded her complaint by emphasizing that Smith’s actions have brought disrepute to the DOJ and the federal government as a whole. She urged the office to open an investigation and hold Smith accountable for his actions.
The complaint cites multiple violations of DOJ policies and a breach of trial ethics, as well as personal bias on the part of Smith. The congresswoman responsible for filing the complaint has called for disciplinary action to be taken against Smith and has requested an immediate investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility. It remains to be seen what actions will be taken in response to this complaint and if it will have any impact on the ongoing legal cases against former President Trump.

05/08/2024

THATS THE NAZI COMMUNIST DEMONICRAPS...DICTATORS,,REMOVING FREEDOMS..FREEDOM OF SPEECH,,,THAT PARTY MUST BE REMOVED,,ILLEGAL IN US.
Family Sues After Teen Suspended for Saying “Illegal Aliens” in Class

A high school student from North Carolina has taken a stand against illegal immigration by suing his school district for violating his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Christian McGhee, a 16-year-old student at Central Davidson High School, was suspended for three days last month for using the term “illegal aliens.” McGhee’s story has gained national attention as he fights back against the school district’s decision to censure him for expressing his views.
The Liberty Justice Center, a non-profit litigation firm dedicated to protecting constitutional freedoms, announced on Tuesday that it was taking on McGhee’s case. According to the group, the incident that led to McGhee’s suspension occurred during a classroom discussion. When his teacher used the word “alien,” McGhee asked for clarification, asking if the term referred to “space aliens, or illegal aliens who need green cards?” Despite causing no disruption in class, school administrators determined that McGhee’s question constituted a “vicious racial slur” and suspended him for three days.
This swift disciplinary action against a student simply asking a question has sparked outrage and raised concerns about censorship on school campuses. The Liberty Justice Center’s lawsuit against the Davidson County Board of Education alleges that the board violated McGhee’s rights to free speech and due process by suspending him without allowing him to appeal the decision.

Buck Dougherty, an attorney with the firm, argued that by suspending McGhee, the school board violated his constitutional rights. Not only was the teen not allowed to appeal his suspension, but he was also subjected to bullying and threats upon returning to school. As a result, his parents pulled him out of the school, and he is now completing his semester through a homeschooling program.
Dean McGee, another attorney with the Liberty Justice Center, emphasized that this lawsuit is about protecting stu

05/02/2024

LIFE IN PRISON,,,MILLIONS IN FINES, LIFE IN PRISON,,REMOVE LICENSE,,,DEPORT HIS FAMILY,,
INJUSTICE EXPOSED: ETHICS COMPLAINT CALLS FOR DISCIPLINE AGAINST SPECIAL COUNSEL IN TRUMP CASES
Daphne Moon May 1, 2024 1 1 min read
A formal ethics complaint was lodged against Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith on Tuesday, alleging that he is engaging in blatant election interference through his prosecution of former President Donald Trump.

The complaint was filed by Elise Stefanik, a Republican Congresswoman from New York and the chair of the House GOP conference. Stefanik accused Smith of serious ethics violations and called for disciplinary action to be taken against him.
In her official complaint to the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility, Stefanik claimed that Smith has engaged in egregious misconduct by pursuing criminal charges against Trump. Smith is currently overseeing two federal cases against the former president, claiming that he committed election interference while challenging the results of the 2020 presidential election and mishandled classified documents.

Stefanik argued that these cases are a clear attempt by Smith to interfere with the 2024 election and prevent Trump from potentially running for president again. She stated that it is obvious to any reasonable observer that Smith is motivated by personal bias and is breaching DOJ policies in his pursuit of Trump.
The congresswoman highlighted that Smith’s repeated attempts to expedite the federal case against Trump fly in the face of long-standing Justice Department policy. She also accused him of violating a stay of proceedings ordered by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Stefanik argued that this behavior is a clear breach of trial ethics and a violation of lawyerly conduct.

Videos

Sorry, no results were found.

People

Sorry, no results were found.

Circles

Sorry, no results were found.

Videos

Sorry, no results were found.

Posts

05/13/2024

LIFE IN PRISON , REMOVE CITIZENSHIPS FOR ALL CORRUPT LAWYERS,,,DA,,,AG,,,AGAINST TRUMP..,,DEPORT THERE FAMILIES, ,.CHECK TAX RETURNS, BANKS ACCTS..,BRIBES ARE FELONY,,,INJUSTICE EXPOSED: ETHICS COMPLAINT CALLS FOR DISCIPLINE AGAINST SPECIAL COUNSEL IN TRUMP CASES
Daphne Moon May 1, 2024 1 1 min read

ShareTweetFlipboardEmail
A formal ethics complaint was lodged against Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith on Tuesday, alleging that he is engaging in blatant election interference through his prosecution of former President Donald Trump.
The complaint was filed by Elise Stefanik, a Republican Congresswoman from New York and the chair of the House GOP conference. Stefanik accused Smith of serious ethics violations and called for disciplinary action to be taken against him.

In her official complaint to the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility, Stefanik claimed that Smith has engaged in egregious misconduct by pursuing criminal charges against Trump. Smith is currently overseeing two federal cases against the former president, claiming that he committed election interference while challenging the results of the 2020 presidential election and mishandled classified documents.
Stefanik argued that these cases are a clear attempt by Smith to interfere with the 2024 election and prevent Trump from potentially running for president again. She stated that it is obvious to any reasonable observer that Smith is motivated by personal bias and is breaching DOJ policies in his pursuit of Trump.

The congresswoman highlighted that Smith’s repeated attempts to expedite the federal case against Trump fly in the face of long-standing Justice Department policy. She also accused him of violating a stay of proceedings ordered by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Stefanik argued that this behavior is a clear breach of trial ethics and a violation of lawyerly conduct.
Stefanik also referenced several legal motions filed by Smith in the wake of the US Supreme Court’s decision to review Trump’s claims of presidential immunity for some of the charges he faces. She stated that pursuing legal action during a stay of proceedings is a blatant example of misconduct and should be investigated by the Office of Professional Responsibility.

Stefanik concluded her complaint by emphasizing that Smith’s actions have brought disrepute to the DOJ and the federal government as a whole. She urged the office to open an investigation and hold Smith accountable for his actions.
The complaint cites multiple violations of DOJ policies and a breach of trial ethics, as well as personal bias on the part of Smith. The congresswoman responsible for filing the complaint has called for disciplinary action to be taken against Smith and has requested an immediate investigation by the Office of Professional Responsibility. It remains to be seen what actions will be taken in response to this complaint and if it will have any impact on the ongoing legal cases against former President Trump.

05/08/2024

THATS THE NAZI COMMUNIST DEMONICRAPS...DICTATORS,,REMOVING FREEDOMS..FREEDOM OF SPEECH,,,THAT PARTY MUST BE REMOVED,,ILLEGAL IN US.
Family Sues After Teen Suspended for Saying “Illegal Aliens” in Class

A high school student from North Carolina has taken a stand against illegal immigration by suing his school district for violating his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Christian McGhee, a 16-year-old student at Central Davidson High School, was suspended for three days last month for using the term “illegal aliens.” McGhee’s story has gained national attention as he fights back against the school district’s decision to censure him for expressing his views.
The Liberty Justice Center, a non-profit litigation firm dedicated to protecting constitutional freedoms, announced on Tuesday that it was taking on McGhee’s case. According to the group, the incident that led to McGhee’s suspension occurred during a classroom discussion. When his teacher used the word “alien,” McGhee asked for clarification, asking if the term referred to “space aliens, or illegal aliens who need green cards?” Despite causing no disruption in class, school administrators determined that McGhee’s question constituted a “vicious racial slur” and suspended him for three days.
This swift disciplinary action against a student simply asking a question has sparked outrage and raised concerns about censorship on school campuses. The Liberty Justice Center’s lawsuit against the Davidson County Board of Education alleges that the board violated McGhee’s rights to free speech and due process by suspending him without allowing him to appeal the decision.

Buck Dougherty, an attorney with the firm, argued that by suspending McGhee, the school board violated his constitutional rights. Not only was the teen not allowed to appeal his suspension, but he was also subjected to bullying and threats upon returning to school. As a result, his parents pulled him out of the school, and he is now completing his semester through a homeschooling program.
Dean McGee, another attorney with the Liberty Justice Center, emphasized that this lawsuit is about protecting stu

05/02/2024

LIFE IN PRISON,,,MILLIONS IN FINES, LIFE IN PRISON,,REMOVE LICENSE,,,DEPORT HIS FAMILY,,
INJUSTICE EXPOSED: ETHICS COMPLAINT CALLS FOR DISCIPLINE AGAINST SPECIAL COUNSEL IN TRUMP CASES
Daphne Moon May 1, 2024 1 1 min read
A formal ethics complaint was lodged against Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith on Tuesday, alleging that he is engaging in blatant election interference through his prosecution of former President Donald Trump.

The complaint was filed by Elise Stefanik, a Republican Congresswoman from New York and the chair of the House GOP conference. Stefanik accused Smith of serious ethics violations and called for disciplinary action to be taken against him.
In her official complaint to the DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility, Stefanik claimed that Smith has engaged in egregious misconduct by pursuing criminal charges against Trump. Smith is currently overseeing two federal cases against the former president, claiming that he committed election interference while challenging the results of the 2020 presidential election and mishandled classified documents.

Stefanik argued that these cases are a clear attempt by Smith to interfere with the 2024 election and prevent Trump from potentially running for president again. She stated that it is obvious to any reasonable observer that Smith is motivated by personal bias and is breaching DOJ policies in his pursuit of Trump.
The congresswoman highlighted that Smith’s repeated attempts to expedite the federal case against Trump fly in the face of long-standing Justice Department policy. She also accused him of violating a stay of proceedings ordered by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Stefanik argued that this behavior is a clear breach of trial ethics and a violation of lawyerly conduct.

ALL connected capable adult (excluding the disabled & kid's-children) whole NECLEUS species-humanity have past historically-2 date SELF sickened, ugh else fill in the blank's (done & allowed by & of $ other's ie: those in Power like enforced Pimp's mob mentally while deeming us ALL else of humanity as the enslaved bitches), despite the Holy word's spoken of 3 in 1 - 1 in 3 Holy Trinity: "THEY-U-WE ALL know NOT comprehensibly what THEY-U-WE ALL have done (& sadly, misc STILL with every tick tock 'Time' (flies) daily (day & night) moment that goes by = OH worse is Coming, MAKE NO MISTAKE & DON'T think 4 a moment U-ANY truly know retributionary Holy disciplinary valid pain-horror-nightmare, sigh huh, OH NO U DON'T but it's Coming! Sigh what a waste & FAILED idea!

04/07/2024

Strategic Sustainability: Navigating the SEC’s Climate Disclosure Waters

Introduction:

The introduction of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) climate-related disclosure requirements marks a significant milestone in the journey towards integrating sustainability into the core of corporate strategy. As a strategist at the helm of guiding our organization through these regulatory waters, I embarked on a voyage that was as much about compliance as it was about redefining our approach to sustainability. This article shares my reflections on this journey, offering insights into how strategic thinking and environmental stewardship intersect in the face of new disclosure mandates.

The Strategic Imperative:

The SEC’s announcement was a clarion call for businesses to elevate their sustainability practices. For me, it underscored the strategic imperative of aligning our corporate objectives with environmental accountability. This was not just about adhering to new regulations; it was an opportunity to embed sustainability into the DNA of our corporate strategy.

Charting the Course:

Deep Dive into the Mandates: The first step was a comprehensive analysis of the SEC’s requirements. This deep dive was crucial for understanding the scope of the disclosures and their implications for our strategic planning. It laid the foundation for our compliance strategy, informed by a clear understanding of the regulatory landscape.

Formulating a Cross-Functional Response: Recognizing the cross-disciplinary nature of the challenge, I spearheaded the formation of a task force that brought together leaders from sustainability, finance, legal, and operations. This collaborative approach ensured that our strategy was holistic, integrating sustainability into various facets of our corporate operations.

Operationalizing Data Collection: At the heart of our strategy was the operationalization of data collection processes. Accurate and comprehensive environmental data was pivotal for informed decision-making and effective disclosure. This step involved both technological investments and process innovations to ensure the integrity of our data.

Engaging with Stakeholders: A key component of our strategic approach was proactive stakeholder engagement. By involving investors, customers, and employees in our sustainability journey, we ensured that our disclosures were not only transparent but also resonant with our stakeholders’ expectations.

Leveraging Education for Empowerment: A significant insight from this journey was the transformative power of education. By developing targeted training programs, we empowered our employees to contribute to our sustainability goals, fostering a culture of environmental stewardship across the organization.

Integrating Risk and Opportunity: A strategic review of climate-related risks and opportunities allowed us to align our sustainability efforts with our broader corporate objectives. This integration was instrumental in crafting a disclosure narrative that reflected both our challenges and our commitments to sustainability.

Narrative Building: Crafting our climate disclosures was an exercise in strategic communication. This narrative was an opportunity to articulate our sustainability journey, showcasing our efforts to mitigate environmental impact and our vision for a sustainable future.

Validation for Credibility: Seeking external verification of our disclosures was a strategic decision aimed at enhancing the credibility of our reporting. This validation process reinforced our commitment to transparency and accountability in our sustainability practices.

Reflections on the Strategic Voyage:

Navigating the SEC’s climate disclosure requirements has been a journey of strategic reevaluation and innovation. It has challenged us to think critically about the role of sustainability in corporate strategy and has highlighted the opportunities for strategic leadership in driving environmental accountability.

A Strategic Call to Action:

For corporate strategists embarking on this journey, my experience underscores the importance of viewing the SEC’s mandates through a strategic lens. Embrace these requirements as an opportunity to strengthen your organization’s commitment to sustainability, leveraging them to drive strategic innovation and competitive advantage.

For those seeking a deeper understanding of the SEC’s climate-related disclosures and practical steps towards strategic compliance, I highly recommend this invaluable resource: https://socious.io/blog/sec-climate-disclosures-compliance-guide-10-steps. It provides a comprehensive guide that has been instrumental in shaping our strategic response to these new mandates.

Conclusion:

My journey through the SEC’s climate disclosure mandates has reinforced my belief in the power of strategic thinking in navigating the complexities of environmental sustainability. As we continue to chart our course through these regulatory waters, let us do so with a commitment to strategic innovation, environmental stewardship, and the pursuit of a sustainable future for all.