Ironically, The U.S. announced yesterday they will be sending an additional $300 million in weapons to Ukraine. Anyone see a problem here?

Last year, we reported on a story where a US official said the White House has “almost zero” ability to track the weapons it is sending to Ukraine. It drops into a big black hole, and you have almost no sense of it at all after a short period of time.” Does that sound reasonable to you?

- Don't forget U.S.-supplied Javelin ATGM anti-tank missile systems were showing up on the dark web last year for $30,000.

- Don't forget the US left billions of dollars of weapons and equipment in Afghanistan. A Taliban official told Al Jazeera that the group seized more than 300,000 light arms, 26,000 heavy weapons, and around 61,000 military vehicles, 95 drones, and more than a million mortar rounds that require little training to use.

It's like the Obama era ATF gun running operation "fast and furious" all over again, but this time they've been equipped with over $100 billion dollars of cutting edge, highly sophisticated, modern weaponry.

Maybe Rand Paul wasn't crazy after all, calling for a special investigator or an audit to track and provide oversight on the $128.9 billion that has been funneled to Ukraine the past year and a half in one of the most blatant money laundering operations to line the pockets of the military industrial complex perhaps ever?

Don't forget there were also reports of the defense contractors "price gouging" the DOD for the weapons they are sending to Ukraine.

It's all a big club and you ain't in it.

It's all quite ironic coming from an administration hell bent on banning your guns.

Support My Work
Venmo/Paypal/CashApp: https://linktr.ee/Jebassler

Follow Me On:

MeWe: https://mewe.com/i/jasonbassler
Twitter: https://twitter.com/JasonBassler1
Minds: https://www.minds.com/jasonbassler/
IG: https://www.instagram.com/jason.e.bassler