pillomavirus-negative and young women, whereas progression to cancer is less than 0.5%. Conservative management should be considered, especially in fertile women and with expected high compliance. Given the heterogeneity in regression rates of high-grade histology, this should be classified as CIN 2 or CIN 3 to guide management.
Diagnosis of HPV infection is usually performed from cervical liquid-based cytology specimens (LBC), but these often contain a large amount of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes, most of which might cause transient infections. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/wzb117.html The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of BD Onclarity HPV test genotyping method on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cervical specimens compared with genotyping results from LBC.

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens from women surgically treated for cervical intraepithelial lesions (CINs) at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, from September 2012 to June 2013 were retrieved from the archives of the Department of Pathology of the European Institute of Oncology. The FFPE and LBC specimens were genotyped using the same extended genotyping Onclarity assay.

We collected 99 samples (26 CIN 1, 30 CIN 2, and 43 CIN 3+), but 15 were excluded from the analysis these 84 samples show an overall agreement of 89% for HPV status between FFPE Onclarity samples versus LBC samples. The FFPE and LBC samples showed identical genotype in 75% samples, compatible genotype (at least 1 of the genotypes detected in LBC sample was found in the tissue sample) in 14% specimens, and discrepant genotype in 11% samples.

Our data demonstrate a very good concordance between HPV genotypes found in cytological and tissue samples, suggesting that the Onclarity method could also be used to detect HPV in tissue samples and that the HPV genotype detected in FFPE samples is one of the HPV detected in cytological samples, supporting the thesis that one lesion is caused by one HPV genotype.
Our data demonstrate a very good concordance between HPV genotypes found in cytological and tissue samples, suggesting that the Onclarity method could also be used to detect HPV in tissue samples and that the HPV genotype detected in FFPE samples is one of the HPV detected in cytological samples, supporting the thesis that one lesion is caused by one HPV genotype.
The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of cervical dysplasia among migrant women with female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) at a specialized clinic in Switzerland.

This is a descriptive retrospective cross-sectional study. We reviewed the electronic medical records of all women who attended a specialized FGM/C clinic at the Geneva University Hospitals between 2010 and 2016. We examined sociodemographic data, sexually transmitted infections, FGM/C types, Pap smear results, and follow-up in women diagnosed with cervical dysplasia.

Three hundred sixty records were reviewed and 338 women were included. The average age was 33 years (SD = 7.47 years). Most women were from Eritrea and Somalia (n = 204, 60.4%) and had FGM/C type III (n = 188, 55.6%). A total of 12.4% (n = 42) of the patients had abnormal Pap smears 1.5% (n = 5) with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV), 7.9% (n = 27) with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), and 2.9% (n = 10) with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or higher (HSIL +). Of the 37 patients with dysplasia, 22 (59.4%) completed follow-up and 15 (40.5%) received incomplete follow-up.

The prevalence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion+ among migrant women with FGM/C is high (2.95%) compared with the general Swiss population (0.58%). Follow-up for cervical dysplasia must be improved by increasing provider knowledge of this patient population and by addressing barriers to care.
The prevalence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion+ among migrant women with FGM/C is high (2.95%) compared with the general Swiss population (0.58%). Follow-up for cervical dysplasia must be improved by increasing provider knowledge of this patient population and by addressing barriers to care.
The aim of the study was to determine the level of interest in human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling as a method of cervical cancer screening in a population of women affiliated with a primary care clinic.

A survey was given to women (N = 182) between the ages of 25 and 69 years attending a family medicine clinic in Edmonton, Canada. Primary outcome measures include (1) the percentage of women who feel that HPV self-sampling should be available and (2) the percentage of women who would prefer HPV self-sampling to the Pap test. Secondary outcomes include the percentage of women aware of HPV self-sampling and factors associated with a preference for HPV self-sampling using logistic regression.

Most women (84%) were up-to-date on Pap testing, and most (85%) had had postsecondary education (either completed or in progress). The percentage of the women who moderately or strongly felt that HPV self-sampling should be available was 60%; the percentage of the women who would prefer HPV self-sampling was 24%. Only 7% of the women reported being previously aware of HPV self-sampling. The factor associated with a preference for HPV self-sampling was the Pap comfort score, with an odds ratio of 1.51 (95% CI = 1.05-2.16, p = .026).

In this population of well-educated women who were mostly up-to-date on cervical screening, there was a clear interest to have the option of HPV self-sampling. It is important for cancer screening programs to take this into account, given that women are the ultimate beneficiaries of these programs.
In this population of well-educated women who were mostly up-to-date on cervical screening, there was a clear interest to have the option of HPV self-sampling. It is important for cancer screening programs to take this into account, given that women are the ultimate beneficiaries of these programs.
The training pathway for plastic surgery has evolved in recent years with the adoption and rise in popularity of the integrated model. Studies have demonstrated that there may be differences between integrated graduates and independent graduates, specifically in career choices and type of practice. This study seeks to understand if there are differences in representation at academic and leadership positions between graduates of the 2 pathways.

A cross-sectional study was conducted in June of 2018 to assess integrated and independent pathway graduate's representation in academic plastic surgery in the United States. Factors examined were career qualifications, academic productivity, faculty positions, and influence of pathway on career advancement.

A total of 924 academic plastic surgeons were analyzed, 203 (22.0%) of whom were integrated graduates and 721 (78.0%) of whom were independent graduates. Independent graduates had greater National Institutes of Health funding (integrated, $40,802; independent, $257,428; P = 0.