KARMA WILL GET JOES FAMILY,,NIECES , NEPHEWS, , TREASON TRAITORS TO AMERICANS,,,LIFE IN PRISON...REMOVE THERE CITIZENSHIP,,,CONFISCATE ALL THERE BANK
ACCTS..STOCKS,,PROPERTIES,,,THEY HAVE A LOT OF TAX PAYERS MONEY,,,Biden’s 2019 Impeachment Comments Lays Groundwork For Own Impeachment
DAILY REPORT May 10,2024

President Joe Biden’s words have come back to bite him after he appeared to have laid the groundwork for his own impeachment before he became president.

President Joe Biden in 2019 endorsed the Democrat-led House’s bid to impeach former President Donald Trump over his phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Democrats accused the former president of withholding aid to Ukraine in a bid to influence the 2020 election in his influence.

“President Trump withheld Congressionally appropriated aid to Ukraine unless they granted him a political favor. It’s the definition of quid pro quo,” Biden wrote in a 2019 X post amid Trump’s impeachment investigation. “This is no joke—Trump continues to put his own personal, political interests ahead of the national interest. He must be impeached.”

In a move that many have described as karma, Biden’s 2019 comment has come back to bite him after he withheld Congress-approved aid to Israel to boost his falling support among the pro-Palestine left.

International Public Notice: Virus Fraud
By Anna Von Reitz


We will let Mike Adams say it for us:
"Bombshell news today on the vaccine front as AstraZeneca, after admitting its covid jabs cause fibrous clots, is now withdrawing its covid vaccine from the entire world marketplace.

The EU has now revoked authorization for this vaccine, meaning it is now illegal to administer this jab to anyone in the EU.

Meanwhile, an attempted reinfection trial that exposed volunteers to 10,000 times the "dose" of covid deemed necessary to cause infections failed to produce a single infection. The premise of virology as being capable of causing pandemics is a total fraud. And that means vaccines are a fraud, too."

We could not surpass his brevity or logic.

Contrary to what the perpetually gullible Public has been led to believe, The Virus Theory, also known as The Germ Theory, is, and has always remained a theory with as many bits of evidence against it as for it.

While the introduction of any foreign substance does trigger the immune system and if it is a biological entity or molecule will provoke the creation of specific antibodies, that doesn't really prove anything about the nature of what we have come to call "viruses".

All this does is prove things about the immune system and basic mechanisms of immunity, leaving the more basic issue of the Causative Agent in limbo.

Our scientists assure us that viruses, also called "exosomes" are dead, little pinched off particles of DNA and waste products encapsulated in a protein shell.

Can dead things "infect"? Not really.

Think of waste DNA and RNA as Hazmat and the protein shell of a virus as a specially designed waste container with a lid. The protein shell is not alive, but its contents, the degraded bits of deoxy or ribonucleic acid can still replicate, if they get back inside a cell.

And then what have you got?

You've got bits of polluted and degraded foreign DNA or RNA snippets coding for foreign proteins inside your cells.

Those foreign proteins then hit your system like a sledge hammer and provoke your immune response -- which is then misidentified as a "disease".

It can be any disease, depending on the nature of the DNA or RNA contained in the "virus" packet, and the nature of the resulting immune response to whatever foreign proteins are being produced.

Blood clotting factor snippets of DNA or RNA code result in foreign blood clotting factor proteins and your immune system reacts to them, specifically.

Tumor producing snippets of DNA or RNA code result in foreign tumor proteins and your immune system reacts to them, specifically.

Each set of such stimulus-response reactions is different, so, Astrazeneca's "vaccine" loaded with blood clotting factor snippets of RNA (left over from a Department of Defense Experiment during the Iraq War) leads to "fibrous clots" as the foreign blood clotting factor proteins meet your body's immune response.

Depending on what the "payload" of DNA or RNA snippets are, you exhibit different symptoms and appear to have different diseases.

Our cell walls and membranes naturally work to exclude foreign DNA and RNA and keep this intracellular production of foreign proteins from happening, but thanks to Doctor Fauci and other Mad Scientists --- tech-crazed men with no actual brains or hearts --- this natural barrier has purportedly been overcome.

To our universal detriment.

We are calling for an immediate full stop and end of production and injection of all DNA and RNA "vaccines" worldwide.

We are calling for the prosecution and public punishment of all the Corporations responsible for this genocidal crime against humanity, and in the case of this country, the prosecution of the US CONGRESS and its Members, which recklessly and in gross negligence and dereliction of duty agreed to accept the liability for vaccine manufacturers.

Let them have the liability for all this expense and disruption and death -- individually, personally, and with 100% commercial liability.

And may no bank dare to give them as much as a peso of our credit. They were not acting "for" us or in our favor when they did this, and they do not deserve any indemnification or insurance at public cost.

The UN CORPORATION has promoted war instead of stopping it, and has contributed to this genocide through its WHO organization. We see no reason for its continued existence, much less any treaty empowering it in any way.

We call for the immediate liquidation of the UN CORPORATION and WHO, both, and an end to any further discussion of a sea "treaty" among the guilty corporations to grant any purported powers possessed by any corporation to either entity.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

International Public Notice: Dear Donald Trump
By Anna Von Reitz


We find it interesting that you began your message concerning your corporation's new "Declaration of Independence" with a lengthy denial of all other claims and claimants, in favor, apparently, of the corporation you represent as President, the U.S.A. Incorporated.

You make it sound like our claims are significantly different than yours, when in fact, over 90% of your Declaration playbook echoes us, our claims, and all the information that we have specifically provided not only to you but to every other American.

The only part of your Declaration that we did not essentially author and don't agree with is the focus on the Act of 1871, which was repealed in 1874. The complaint against the United States Corp is deserved and understood, however, that is only half the story.

The corporation that you represent as Commander-in-Chief existed prior to the United States Corp and the financial difficulties that you describe in the wake of the Civil War as the generative cause of the debacle, arose as a result of the war debts and bankruptcy of the United States of America, Incorporated.

That is, the financial maladies were those of a foreign corporation acting as a Federal Government Subcontractor. Your corporation.

It was not our government, not the sovereign American Government, that acquired the debt and went bankrupt. Think about it, Mr. Trump, only incorporated entities enjoy that privilege.

Just like the United States Corp, the United States of America, Incorporated, is a separate incorporated entity. Just like the United States Corp, the United States of America, Incorporated, is a foreign entity engaged in providing "essential government services" under contract to our Government.

The version of the United States of America, Incorporated, established prior to the so-called Civil War, was bankrupted by Abraham Lincoln in April of 1863. That was the source of the financial trouble.

Your corporation's bankruptcy, Mr. Trump.

Nothing has changed except that the Military engaged by that same corporation, woke up, realized that Abraham Lincoln left them in charge, and that everything in this country is going to dog dung on their watch.

Well, good on you and good on them for that, but you can't fix it by telling more lies and trying to claim assets and credit that never belonged to your corporation in the first place.

The Civil War, insomuch as it could be styled as a "war" was an illegal mercenary conflict between corporations and between foreign government interests on our shores. It had precious little to do with us or with slavery, either.

The two corporations pitted against each other, the United States Corp and the United States of America, Incorporated, have kept this conflict going --- for their own profit --- ever since.

The only break in the conflict came from 1937 to your inauguration, when the two corporations signed The Declaration of Interdependence of the Governments in The United States, as a truce and collusion, which allowed both corporations to develop full blown "administrations" and prey upon the American Public with equal ferocity.

Surely, you have noticed that we have two of everything? The IRS and the Internal Revenue Service, the DOD and the Department of Defense, the DOL and the Department of Labor, the DOJ and the Department of Justice.... we could go on, but this is self-evident and can only be accounted for by the 1937 Declaration of Interdependence referenced above.

Do you really think that the American people needed complete redundancy and double-dipping, two complete (and both foreign) court systems, two Internal Revenue Services? Internal to what?

Mr. Trump, surely, at this late date, both foreign corporations should simply surrender and accept the fact that this country belongs to its people and nobody else--- it certainly doesn't belong to any foreign corporation residing in the District of Columbia or the (British Territorial) State of Delaware or any foreign country (like Scotland) whatsoever.

Two thieves arguing over the spoils is not the same as the actual owner showing up, and by factual definition the actual owner is and has to be: (1) American and (2) Unincorporated.

Your corporation, like the United States Corp, fails on both counts.

So, we believe that we have dispensed with all claims of all incorporated entities seeking to "represent" us, and claiming an interest of any kind in our land and other physical assets.

Our venerable declaration, The Unanimous Declaration of Independence, serves us more than well-enough.

We wish to point out, Mr. Trump, that the British Territorial Government is an instrumentality of the British Government as a whole, and that the British Government as a whole, is an instrumentality of the Pope, and that in matters of commerce, that means the Roman Pontiff.

Both corporations, the United States Corp and the United States of America, Incorporated, are owned by the Pope and administered by the Pope acting as the Roman Pontiff.

If we have been gullible and trusting and easily led, then so have you corporate moguls, who registered your corporations and gave up your ownership of them to other faceless Legal Fiction Entities and assumed Authorities.

There. Did you finally, just now, feel the floor drop?

The Pope owns both the United States Corp and the United States of America, Incorporated, because the very idea of corporations originated with the Roman Curia. He rules these creations of the mind under Ecclesiastical Law, and sits like Hammurabi as the final dictator of both Law Merchant and its codified cousin, the Law of Maritime Commerce.

So the fight between the United States Corp and the United States of America, Incorporated, in 1861 or today, has only existed with his blessings and for his benefit, as both these corporations quite literally belong to him. And he is responsible for them.

We, however, are unincorporated beings living under a free and independent ---and unincorporated--- government, in an actual and factual world, which is a Divine Creation. We are divine creations, too.

We see through all of these illusions straight to the heart of the matter. We see who is responsible for this mess, and it isn't you, Donald Trump.

Keep it that way.

Stop trying to interpose your corporation as our Keeper, or Custodian, exercising a "stewardship" interest in our assets. We are quite capable of choosing our own Deputies (not Trustees) in free and open public elections, unsullied by the manipulations of political parties.

We invited you to join us and to leave behind the ugly phantasm you've been living in. Click your silver slippers, Donald, and come home. Declare your birthright political status and take responsibility for your own DNA and your own soul and your own soil.

It's not that difficult to be unincorporated and it's far more effective than tilting at paper windmills and worrying about paper debts.

Yes, we have been defrauded and deceived, and so have you.

As the Roman Civil Law says, "Let him who will be deceived, be deceived." and as we are beset by Romans, it would be good if you simply shook your head, woke up, and realized --- this is all phony.

All these corporations and corporation franchises and codes and debts made of paper --- it's all fraud. It's all ridiculous. It is insubstantial. It's a sideshow schtick.

We are not deceived, and so we are set free.

And all the fraud against us must be set aside, or as the Romans say, "Fictio cedit veritati; fictio juris non est, ubi veritas." --- in English, "Fiction yields to truth; where truth is, fiction of law does not exist."

Repeat that three times and understand what the phrase "people of substance" really means. We are people of substance, not "persons" made of paper.

We know who we are, what we are, where we are, and more importantly, we know what we are owed both in terms of our physical assets and in terms of good faith services.

Both the Pope's corporations owe us good faith service, so he and his "Empire of the City" need to honor their ancient cult laws and the Law of the City and the Roman Civil Law and the Ecclesiastical Law by which they are still bound.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

http://www.paulstramer.net/2024/05/international-public-notice-dear-donald.html

Biden’s 2019 Attack Against Trump Used Against Him Now

An attack President Joe Biden hurled at former President Donald Trump in 2019 has now come back to haunt him five years later. Back then, Biden had claimed that Trump deserved to be impeached over a phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in which Trump suggested that he would withhold promised financial and military aid if some conditions were not met.

In Biden’s own words: President Trump withheld Congressionally appropriated aid to Ukraine unless they granted him a political favor. It’s the definition of quid pro quo. This is no joke — Trump continues to put his own personal, political interests ahead of the national interest. He must be impeached.”
The president’s tweet has now resurfaced after he said on Wednesday that he would withhold military aid already promised to Israel and approved by Congress if the Jewish nation carries out its planned invasion of Rafah.
According to critics, Biden should also get impeached over his threat to Israel.
“Joe Biden endorses his own impeachment,” Red State’s Bonchie pointed out.

The Federalist’s Sean Davis reframed Biden’s 2019 tweet about Trump to match his current situation.
“Joe Biden withheld Congressionally appropriated aid to Israel unless they granted him a political favor. It’s the definition of quid pro quo. This is no joke — Biden continues to put his own personal, political interests ahead of the national interest. He must be impeached,” he wrote.

WATCH: CNN LEGAL ANALYST MOCKS STORMY DANIELS’ ‘DISASTROUS’ TESTIMONY
Daphne Moon May 9, 2024 0 1 min read
CNN legal analyst Elie Honig strongly criticized the recent developments in the trial against former President Donald Trump, saying that the testimony of porn star Stormy Daniels was “disastrous” for the prosecution’s case. Honig argued that the cross-examination by Trump’s attorneys went poorly for Democratic Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

Honig highlighted Daniels’ responses to questions from Trump’s attorneys, stating that they were “disastrous” for the prosecution. He pointed out that when the witness openly expresses hatred towards the person whose liberty is at stake, it significantly undermines their credibility. In this case, Daniels has made public statements and tweets expressing her dislike for Trump and even fantasizing about him being in jail. This, according to Honig, is a significant red flag and raises doubts about her reliability as a witness.
Moreover, Honig also noted other pertinent issues that emerged from the cross-examination of Daniels, including her outstanding debt of $500,000 to Trump and her defiance of a court order to pay it. He argued that this could also be used by the defense team to discredit her testimony and question her integrity. If Daniels is willing to defy a court order, why should she be trusted to uphold the oath she took in court?
On further examination, it seems that the cross-examination by Trump’s attorneys is making significant inroads in the case. While Daniels’ direct testimony may have initially seemed beneficial for the prosecution, the defense has effectively challenged her credibility and raised doubts about her reliability as a witness. Honig admitted that at the end of the direct examination, it seemed like the prosecution had gotten what they needed. However, the cross-examination has seemingly turned the tide in Trump’s favor.
The trial, led by Democratic Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, has indicted Trump on 34 felony counts related to the alleged falsification of business records regarding a $130,000 payout to porn star Stormy Daniels in 2016. However, with the current developments in the courtroom, it seems that the prosecution’s case is crumbling. Honig himself admitted that the cross-examination was a “big damn deal” for the prosecution, as Daniels’ responses have severely damaged her credibility as a witness.