Virtual Tutoring Jobs Made Easy: ViTutors' Expertise

ViTutors is an established brand in the world of virtual tutoring jobs, offering an exceptional platform that connects talented educators with eager learners through the power of technology. With a commitment to excellence, ViTutors is transforming the way individuals access educational support and opportunities in the digital age.

For more information, visit: https://vitutors.com/online-tutoring-jobs/

How can I possibly discern truth from all this misinformation?

Today, more than ever, it is crucial that each of us have a strong biblical, revelation-based approach for discerning the truth. Toward that end, we are so excited to share this practical training series: How Do YOU Know?

You are invited to watch the entire video series at no cost from September 19-27!

Register for free: https://go.cluschoolofthespirit.com/hdyk

How do you know? What is the process you use to discover truth? I did not ask that question during the first 25 years of my life. I used eleven different methods for discovering truth including: if my parents said so, then it was so. If my teacher said it was so, then it was so. If my pastor said it was so, then it was so. If my theology said it was so, then it was so. I have discarded them all and adopted a twelfth method, which is in harmony with what the Bible teaches. We teach you this method in this series.

What Does the Bible Say Is the Process God Wants Us to Use to Discover His Truth?
Satan's temptation in the Garden of Eden was that man could "eat from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil and know himself." I wouldn’t need daily walks and talks with God, letting Him reveal truth to me. I could figure it out on my own. “YOU can KNOW” was satan’s lie to Adam (Gen. 2:17; 3:5).

So now the Bible speaks of knowledge versus true knowledge, man’s knowledge versus God’s knowledge.

True knowledge is birthed in revelation from God, which comes directly to man through the Holy Spirit. To receive this revelation knowledge man must yield his heart and his mind to the indwelling river of God - to "flow." This will result in reasoning together with God (Isa. 1:18), receiving words of wisdom, words of knowledge, prophecy, discerning of spirits and much, much more.

The Bible teaches us that God’s paradigm for knowing is a broad-based approach. You will discover God’s method as you work your way through hundreds of verses that form the base of this guided self-discovery manual.

This series lays out a Spirit-anointed epistemology requiring an educational paradigm shift from rationalism to revelation knowledge. The goal of education is stated in I Timothy 1:5 - love from a pure heart, a good conscience, and a sincere faith. These are all heart experiences, not mental exercises. And these are exactly the heart experiences that are required for us to come through the veil into God's presence and receive His voice, His wisdom, His anointing, His dream, and His vision (Heb. 10:19-22).

So sign up and invite your friends to join you for an impartation of this exciting revelation, which is a Scriptural and divinely-inspired process for discovering His truth.

P.S.
With so much misinformation being presented daily on the airwaves, many are confused. Only one side of many stories is even allowed to be told in today's demonic climate.

Actually, one of the videos in this series was rejected by YouTube as "misinformation" since I presented a view different from the government's sanctioned view on the topic! I celebrate the fact that my messages are so culturally relevant that they can be kicked off from social media.

From 9/11 to Domestic Threat Actors — Control Is the Goal - Dr Mercola
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2023/09/08/control-is-the-goal.aspx?ui=551eda515442ee5cc8f0c77cc67b3f3febd63142ec0dc6cef1d4521e5ea666eb&sd=20200307&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20230908_HL2&foDate=false&mid=DM1461286&rid=1906246263
Story at-a-glance

The United States has been unique in its dedication to free speech, but that Constitutional right has been slowly eroded in the name of national security and protecting public health
In 1950, Sen. Joseph McCarthy claimed to have proof of a communist spy ring within the U.S. State Department. The lesson from that time was the destructive power of accusation
In 2017, an organization called Hamilton 68 claimed to have proof showing hundreds of Russian-affiliated Twitter accounts manipulated the U.S. election to get Trump into the White House. It turned out to be a complete hoax, but media never updated the public with that truth
In 1948, the same year the CIA launched Project Mockingbird, the U.S. Information and Educational Exchange Act (aka the Smith-Mundt Act) became law, which forbade the U.S. government from pushing propaganda onto the U.S. population. President Barrack Obama repealed this law in 2013, thereby legalizing the propagandizing of Americans
For propaganda to be truly successful, especially in the long term, you also need censorship, and in the U.S., this requires the undermining of free speech rights. The undermining of free speech took off at the end of 2016, when Obama signed into law the Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act, which opened the door to an offensive information war against the public

British Law Compilation from United Kingdom Research
By Anna Von Reitz


Good evening, all. Anna Maria here, billeted in the Toad's Hole Redoubt, thinking deep thoughts about the long, long road that brought me here.

I know that numerous people, other Americans without my time in grade, are going to be wondering -- WTH? What is Anna going on about now? Why is she bringing forward British law? What does that have to do with us?

Almost everything. We just don't know it and haven't been taught the actual history of Britain or America. We must educate ourselves and each other as best we can.

To follow this thread, you need to go back to The Seven Years War in Europe, which is what we call -- euphemistically, "The French and Indian War" that began in 1756 and which pitted the British, the French, and virtually everyone in Europe against Frederick, the Great of Prussia, and against each other, too. A more complex ball of wax can scarcely be imagined.

At one time in the middle of this conflict, Frederick II was fighting a seven-front war in Europe. Meanwhile, here in America, King George had seized the opportunity to throw off numerous pesky treatiies and inconvenient agreements with Native American tribes, most especially the Delaware and LeNape. The Native leaders quickly allied with the French and there you are, facing seven years of running battles along a frontier stretching a thousand miles from Virginia up the East Coast and westward through the Great Lakes to Montreal.

It was a blistering fight, and this is where and when Colonel Geo. Washington cut his teeth. In addition to being a total wreck diplomatically and militarily (because Frederick II of Prussia won in Europe) the Seven Years War - French and Indian War left Great Britain deeply in debt and shoving its war debts off onto the Americans and any other colonies they could charge to share their war debts and reparations.

It was the misery and extra taxation caused by these war debts that led to the Stamp Acts and other inducements that finally led to The War of Independence twenty years later.

In my ruminations and investigations into the IRS and its activities I have found that they always act as privateers and set up shop on islands that are "possessions" styled as either commonwealths or private enclaves. From 1925 to 2017 Puerto Rico, a British Commonwealth, was used in precisely this fashion. They have since made provisions to move their primary operations to the Mariana Islands where the same conditions exist.

The British Crown's purchase of the Isle of Mann for such purposes in 1765 is detailed below. This is where and when the then-equivalent of the IRS set up shop to collect war reparation taxes from the Seven Years War. This started as a collection of tariffs on imported goods and a Coast Guard operation of the British Crown to counteract illegal smuggling on the Irish Sea, but over time, came to be a collection operation for the Inquisition of Income taxes owed by the Catholic faithful as the once-a-year collection known as Peter's Pence, too.

The British Crown was already collecting tariffs and excise taxes, so they simply contracted with the Holy See to act as Tax Collectors for them, too.

What I want you all to notice is the way the Internal Revenue Service grew out of a tax to fund the Church's Crusades and a tax to pay for the King's War Debt from The Seven Years War in Europe and the French and Indian War in America. Both these taxes are imposed to pay war debts --- not government services.

Contrary to what we have been led to believe, the bulk of all those tax collections never went to pay for government services. They went to pay for the expenses of war, war, and more war. And they still do. An estimated 80% of all taxes collected from Americans are war reparations and we are portrayed as the most blood-thirsty and violent and criminal nation on Earth as part of the narrative which tries to justify this.

So let's step back 258 years and see where it all began--- (from here on the comments are from our friend in Britain who kindly compiled this invaluable Timeline.)

1765 - Isle of Man Purchase Act 1765 - 5 Geo. 3 c. 26, also known as the Act of Revestment, purchased the feudal rights of the Dukes of Atholl as Lords of Man over the Isle of Man, and revested them into the British Crown.

This allowed the Isle of Man to become a tax haven and allowed the British Monarch to assume the title ‘Lord of Man’

1765 - Isle of Man Purchase Act 1765 - 5 Geo. 3 c. 26, also known as the Act of Revestment, purchased the feudal rights of the Dukes of Atholl as Lords of Man over the Isle of Man, and revested them into the British Crown.

This allowed the Isle of Man to become a tax haven and allowed the British Monarch to assume the title ‘Lord of Man’

Here is my research of a historical timeline of the documents that affect the freedoms of the people of the British Commonwealth and ultimately makes practical slaves of nearly the whole planet. They are effectively government signed confessions of their own tyranny.

Much of the info came from http://www.friendware.net/canons/positive_law.html



This is obviously not taught in schools, so the vast majority of people are ignorant of these facts. For some early events of my research I have no documentation, but from the Magna Carta onwards, the majority are there.



There are many documents that define things to be something other than what they appear For are commonly accepted to be.

There are some documents missing from the 20th century as the government seems to have lost them…

It takes quite some time to search for statutes that have 'page not found' status on the government website.

I've found a lot of older ones on Google Books, but those from the 20th century are harder to access as they are still in copyright.

What we need is someone with access to a good law library. So that those that are not available can be checked.


I was helped enormously by the work of annavonreitz.com for a great starter on the historical stuff. I have also been reading expertinalllegalmatters.com and the work of jean keating for greater insights to the workings of the law.


This document is not complete yet, and may never be - many notes need to be added, however I feel I should help people to get started with their own research if they like.

Be aware that the statutes use doublespeak when relating to maritime things. People are defined as ships, house-boats and other maritime craft because the body is a vessel for the soul according to the dictionary.

These watercraft are all “vessels not propelled by oars”, as are we, if we look at the dictionary definition in an open minded way.

From there it is a small step to realise that a “navigable Inland waterway” can be construed to be the birth canal, as it is navigable.

A “harbour” can also be regarded as the womb. “Harbour works” is a baby within the harbour.

You’ll find more as you read.

The statutes also have to be written so that they can be read as having their ‘normal’ meaning. This leads to many convoluted statutes, which were commented on in contemporary publications about the law. I may not have listed all of these.



See also https://drive.google.com/file/d/1g2wSClvB8fl6e3uthA7wEDIGeTEODbZP/view



All Upper case text is in fact not recognised as English.


1066 - This timeline starts just after the Battle of Hastings. Apparently William had been promised England by the previous king and his claim was supported by the Pope.

This invasion was also apparently as the British were in violation of the Treaty of Camlan, in which they had ceded Wales to the Gauls some centuries before. http://annavonreitz.com/bloodmoney23.pdf


William I (the Conqueror) comes to London and agrees that it can keep its ancient rights and customs. This means that London is independent from rule by the monarch.



https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/things-to-do/history-and-heritage/london-metropolitan-archives/collections/william-i-charter-to-the-city-of-london

William puts favoured nobles in charge of the land. These are his tenants-in-chief, who then have to pay William for the privilege of their position. They do this by taxing the peoples of their individual domains.



1087 - William commissions the Domesday Book, which lists the assets of the kingdom, but tellingly does not include London, or Winchester, where William was based when in the country.



William dies in France as the result of a hunting accident. He leaves the succession of his English lands ‘for God to decide’ and not to any of his sons.

The tenants in chief take this to mean that they now rule over the lands under their control, this was intended to ensure that that there would be no single monarch of England from then on.



His son, William II, is left 5000 pounds of silver, but no territories. William II then headed to England and demanded to be crowned. This proceeds, but he has no real lands to be King of, however he does have the title. This gets passed down through succession until it ends up with king John.



William also leaves a lot of useless land to the church. These church lands are ultimately under the control of the Pope. These lands are known as the Common Wealth.



William II Norman 1087–1100



Henry I Norman 1100–35



Stephen Blois 1135–54



Henry II Plantagenet 1154–89



Richard I Plantagenet 1189–99



John Plantagenet 1199–1216



1213 - Great Britain owned by Vatican - Treaty of Verona??? http://annavonreitz.com/kingscharter.pdf



1215 - Magna Carta - King John 1st - King John acknowledges to the Barons (descendents of William I’s Tenants-in-Chief) that he is not the sovereign king of England and they are sovereign in their own right over their own lands. They agree on a host of other things, but these promises are broken on both sides within weeks. Other Magna Cartas follow.

King John is known as John Lacklands as he has no territory of his own. The Pope makes him steward of the Common Wealth lands. Every monarch since has been a stooge of the Roman Pontiff.



More here: http://annavonreitz.com/avaluablehistorylesson.pdf'>http://annavonreitz.com/avaluablehistorylesson.pdf




Henry III Plantagenet 1216–72



1217 - Covenant of the Commonwealth, where the Church gained the "eternal" right to possess the land and inheritance of "paupers" vouchsafed to its care by the King of England.

http://annavonreitz.com/diabolica.pdf



Edward I Plantagenet 1272–1307



1279 - Statute of Mortmain - https://avalon.law.yale.edu/medieval/mortmain.asp

This was intended to put an end to "the fraudulent bestowal of estates on religious foundations, on the understanding that the donor should hold them as fiefs of the church, and as so exonerated from public burdens.



1290 - Quia Emptores - (18 Edw.1 c.1) = https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw1/18/1

The feudal dues of the superior lords, the king the chief of them, are secured by the abolition of subinfeudation; as, in this act, they are secured by the limitation of ecclesiastical endowments.



Meanwhile across the seas in Rome -



1302 - "Unam Sanctam" Trust - Pope Boniface VIII - Claimed the land, sea and air of the ‘world’ for Jesus, to be passed onto him upon his return.



The last line reads: “Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff.”



It is not only the first trust deed in history but also the largest trust ever conceived, as it claims the whole planet and everything on it, conveyed in trust.



Effectively, the Pope claims to be in charge of the world (and has God on his side)

Back to England.



Edward II Plantagenet 1307–27



This is where the statutes start, although there is some disagreement about whether this was a statute of just an acknowledgement of the king's rights.

- Statutes have a short title as well as a character system that defines them. For example - 10 &11 Vict. c. 27 - would refer to the 27th act of the parliament that sat in the 10th and 11th years of Victoria’s reign. But the tyranny of Victoria is over half a millennium away, there’s plenty that goes on before then.



We start with one of the oddest statutes that remains on the books. Unfortunately I don’t have the evidence that I need (and may never have due to the obscurity of the clinching document) to offer it as proof of how twisted things can be, but hear me out.

1322 - Prerogativa Regis - 15 Edw 2 cc 13 17 - Whales and Great Sturgeons - https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw2cc1317/15/13#reference-c918980

This Act was subject to a treatise on ‘The Statutes of the Realm’ in 1495 by Thomas Frowyk who was admitted to the Inner Temple of the Inns of Court.



Only two parts have apparently not been repealed.



Section xiij originally reads as follows:



Item habet warectum maris (a) per tottnn regnuni ; wallenas et

sturgiones captos in mari vel alibi infra regnum, exceptis quibusdam

locis privilegiatis per Regis.



Also the King shall have wreck of the sea (a) throughout the

realm ; whales and sturgeons taken in the sea or elsewhere within

the realm, except in certain places privileged by the King.

It was altered in 1894 to read thus and is found as such on the government website:



xiij Wreck of the Sea, Whales and Sturgeons.



Also the King shall have . . . F4 throughout the Realm, Whales and [X3great Sturgeons] taken in the Sea or elsewhere within the Realm, except in certain Places privileged by the King.

Editorial Information X3 Variant reading of the text noted in The Statutes of the Realm as follows: Sturgeons

Textual Amendments F4 Words repealed by Merchant Shipping Act 1894 (c. 60), Sch. 22



This all seems pretty innocuous, but will be referred to in a section for 1495 when we come to discuss its importance 570 years into the future.



Edward III Plantagenet 1327–77



Black Death in the winter of 1349–1350

The first definite statute that seems to control the populace came just after a European Pandemic



1349 - June 18 - The Ordinance of Labourers - (23 Edw. 3) - https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/seth/ordinance-labourers.asp - Introduced in response to the ravages on the workforce of the Black Death. It forced all under 60 to work and prohibited free movement of labour. Fixed wages and introduced price controls.



1350 - A Statute for those born In Parts beyond Sea (1350) - https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw3/25/0/contents

1351 - Second Statute of Labourers - https://spartacus-educational.com/YALDstatute.htm - This statute set a maximum wage for labourers that was commensurate with wages paid before the Black Death, specifically, in the year 1346



1368 - Observance of due Process of Law - https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Edw3/42/3



Richard II Plantagenet 1377–99



1381- May 30th – November 1381 - The Peasants' Revolt, also named Wat Tyler's Rebellion or the Great Rising, was a major uprising across large parts of England in 1381. Result‎: ‎Sacking of Tower of London and mass killing of Royal Officials. However it didn’t last long. https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofEngland/Wat-Tyler-the-Peasants-Revolt/



Henry IV Plantagenet: Lancaster 1399–1413



Henry V Plantagenet: Lancaster 1413–22



Henry VI Plantagenet: Lancaster 1422–61

1452 - Pope Nicholas V issues the Dum Diversas Papal Bull https://religion.wikia.org/wiki/Dum_Diversas , which ushers in the West African slave trade.



1455 - Pope Nicholas V creates the first Testamentary Trust, through a deed and will. This creates a Deceased Estate, through the Papal Bull “Romanus Pontifex.”



This is only one of three (3) papal bulls to include the line with the incipit “For a perpetual remembrance.”



This Bull had the effect of conveying the right of use of the land as Real (Royal) Property, from the Express Trust Unam Sanctam, to the control of the Pontiff and his successors in perpetuity. Hence, all land is claimed as “crown land”.



This 1st Crown of the Commonwealth is represented by the 1st Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born. It deprives us of all beneficial entitlements and rights on the land.

22 May 1455 – 16 June 1487 War of the Roses



Edward IV Plantagenet: York 1461–70



Henry VI Plantagenet: Lancaster 1470–71



Edward IV Plantagenet: York 1471–83



1481 - Pope Sixtus IV creates The 2nd Crown of the Commonwealth



The second Crown was created with the papal bull Aeterni Regis, meaning “Eternal Crown”, being only the 2nd of three papal bulls as deeds of testamentary trusts.



It gives the Bearer control over all lands as the Pope’s representative of the Unum Sanctum



This Papal Bull created the “Crown of Aragon”, later known as the Crown of Spain, and is the highest sovereign and highest steward of all Roman Slaves subject to the rule of the Roman Pontiff.



This 2nd Crown is represented by the 2nd cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born and, by the sale of the birth certificate as a Bond to the private central bank of the nation, depriving us of ownership of our flesh and condemning us to perpetual servitude, as a Roman person, or slave.



Edward V Plantagenet: York 1483



Richard III Plantagenet: York 1483–85



1483 - The “first” Act outlining Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts - 1Rich.3 c.1 https://ucadia.s3.amazonaws.com/statutes_uk/1400_1499/uk_1483_1Rich3_c1_cestui_que_trust.pdf

22 May 1455 – 16 June 1487 War of the Roses



Henry VII Tudor 1483–1509



1494 - Vagabonds and Beggars Act 1494 - (11 Henry VII c.2) “Vagabonds, idle and suspected persons shall be set in the stocks for three days and three nights and have none other sustenance but bread and water and then shall be put out of Town. Every beggar suitable to work shall resort to the Hundred where he last dwelled, is best known, or was born and there remain upon the pain aforesaid.”



The next bit is my own speculation of which I have no proof.

1495 - Thomas Frowyk (1460 - 1506) of the Inner Temple gives a reading about Prerogativa Regis of 1322 (The Royal Prerogative - with regard to Whales and Great Sturgeons). Thomas Frowyk’s mother was Jane Sturgeon. His Grandfather, Henry, was Lord Mayor of London.

It is my supposition that there is some aside in one of the manuscripts of the reading about ‘man being a great Sturgeon’ as the current legislation in 2020 refers to Great Sturgeons rather than just sturgeons, which would be the correct translation.

This imagined aside is what I believe enables the amendment of Prerogativa Regis in 1894. The Monarch will no longer be able to claim all ‘wrecks of the sea’ as his property, but this twisted interpretation will enable the same ends.

The most likely manuscript of the eight or so that were known to have survived until the 20th century to contain this aside was probably kept in the Inner Temple library, which was bombed in 1943 and the manuscript was apparently destroyed.

My suspicions are backed up by the fact that there is argument in support of keeping the words “Sturgeons” in future legislation, for example - https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/1971-02-04/debates/68b0bda5-b8b8-4476-84b4-e4d39ba72613/WildCreaturesAndForestLawsBillHl



Henry VIII Tudor 1509–47

1531 - The Vagabonds Act of 1530 (22 Henry VIII c.12) - Directed the justices of the peace to assign to the impotent poor an area within which they were to beg. Generally, the licences to beg for the impotent poor were limited to the disabled, sick, and elderly.[20] An impotent person begging out of his area was to be imprisoned for two days and nights in the stocks, on bread and water, and then sworn to return to the place in which he was authorised to beg.[21] An able-bodied beggar was to be whipped, and sworn to return to the place where he was born, or last dwelt for the space of three years,



1535 - (27 Hen.8 c.28) King Henry VIII of England and his Venetian/Magyar banking advisers seized the property of the poor and common farmers as well as the major church properties under the pretext they were “small religious estates”.



1536 - Statute of Uses 1536 - (27 Hen 8 c 10) - https://pryan2.kingsfaculty.ca/pryan/assets/File/Statute%20of%20Uses%2C%20Wills%2C%20and%20Enrolments%201536.pdf An Act of the Parliament of England that restricted the application of uses in English property law. The Statute ended the practice of creating uses in real property by changing the purely equitable title of beneficiaries of a use into absolute ownership with the right of seisin (possession).

The Statute was conceived by Henry VIII of England as a way to rectify his financial problems by simplifying the law of uses, which moved land outside the royal tax revenue (ie., through royal fees called feudal incidents), traditionally imposed through seisin. At the time, land could not be passed by a will, and when it devolved to the heir upon death was subject to taxes. Hence, the practice evolved of landowners creating a use of the land to enable it to pass to someone other than their legal heir upon their death, or simply to try and reduce the incidence of taxation.

V26 - STATUTE OF USES 1535: English Law Series



1537 - Pope Paul III creates The 3rd Crown of the Ecclesiastical See



The third Crown was created through the papal bull Convocation, also meant to open the

Council of Trent.



It is the third and final testamentary deed and will of a testamentary trust, set up for the claiming of all “lost souls”, lost to the Sea (See [of Rome]).



The Venetians assisted in the creation of the 1st Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540, to use this papal bull as the basis of Ecclesiastical authority of Henry VIII.



This 3rd Crown was secretly granted to England in the collection and “reaping” of lost souls.



This Crown is represented by the 3rd Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is baptized.



It is the parents’ grant of the Baptismal certificate––title to the soul––to the church or Registrar. The application of baptisimal sacramental procedure was changed In a Papal Bull l, Altitudo divini consilii issued by Pope Paul III in 1837



Thus, without legal title over one’s own soul, you will be denied legal standing and will be treated as things––vessels (or ships{see later]) without souls––upon which the BAR is now legally able to enforce Maritime law.



1539 - (31 Hen.8 c.13) seizes larger estates.

1542 - Laws in Wales Act -



1540 - Statute of Wills - (32 Hen.8 c.1), all property was to be owned through “Estates” effectively being Welfare Funds granted by the Crown to the Benefit of use of Subjects with the most common being Estates for the non wealthy now considered “Wards of the Estate”.

https://reginajeffers.blog/2022/07/25/statute-of-wills-henry-viiis-answer-to-primogeniture/



1545 - (37 Hen.8 c.1) King Henry VIII reintroduced a title directly and solely connected to the slave trade of Rome, abolished by emperors and forbidden under Christian law called the “Custos Rotulorum” meaning literally “Keeper of the Slave Rolls” into every county, to maintain records of the Poor now as slaves. The same sacrilegious, immoral, ecclesiastically unlawful positions continue into the 21st Century as connected with Birth Certificates.



Edward VI Tudor 1547–53



1547 - (1 Ed.6 c.3), Edward VI issued a new statute that did forbid people considered poor from travelling, except for work, or from claiming their own time and activities and whether or not to work.



All people (except those members of the ruling elite, particularly those non-Christian sects from Pisa, Venice and parts of Spain responsible for wholly false religious and legal texts) now declared slaves were either to be gainfully employed in the service of some lord or master, to work to death, or if they were found to be idle, or enjoying life then they were to be seized and permanently branded with a “V” and either sold as a slave or exterminated.



The only exceptions to the rule were those men who chose to dedicate themselves to support the status quo and become educated and knowledgeable in the false texts and false scriptures of the slave masters, i.e. those who joined the legal profession. (Given the title Esquire).



This act was supposed to have been repealed in 1549 (3 & 4 Ed.6 c.16).



However, the act was then restored to full effect in 1572 (14 Ed. c.5) and through subsequent repeals of repeals, remains in force.



Mary I Tudor 1553–58



Elizabeth I Tudor 1558–1603



1571 - Letters Patent Act 1571 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Eliz1/13/6/contents



1589 - Erection of Cottages Act 1589 - (31 El c. 7) - Measures were introduced which had the effect of accelerating the disenfranchisement of land peasants into landless paupers. The peasants then required local parish permission to erect dwellings whereas before the erection of a dwelling by a land peasant on their lord’s land was considered a “right”.



As a result, the ranks of the landless poor, or “paupers” swelled as available to be press-ganged into work.



1601 (43 El. c.2) To placate the overwhelming hostility against England as a hellhole of slavery, exploitation and superstition, a new act was introduced. This was one of the early Poor Acts



1601 - Relief of Mariners Act (43 El. c.3) A “secret version” of 43 El. c.2 began to industrialize, hide and franchise slavery with the introduction of “overseers” of the poor as the foremen over the slaves, under a “cleric” of the parish and the renaming of children sold as sex slaves and workers to be called “Apprentices”.



Thus the Apprenticeship system was invented not to improve conditions, but to “rebrand” slavery under the Non Christian English-Venetian-Pisan model of commerce.



The act also introduced a new levy, collected by Parishes was called the “Poor Rates” (now called “council taxes”) against wealthy property owners for their “rent” of use of the poor as slaves.



This is the financial origin of Annuities 100 years later



James I Stuart 1603–25



1604 - The King of Spain loses the Crown of the Commonwealth. (Land)



1605 - The Crown of the Commonwealth is granted to King James I of England by Pope Paul V after the successful passage of the “Union of Crowns”, or Commonwealth, in 1605 after the false flag operation of the Gunpowder Plot.

1609 - The Mystery Act - 7 Jac. c 14 http://annavonreitz.com/1609mysterycompany.pdf http://annavonreitz.com/downloadforyourrecords.pdf

1609 - Sea Sand (Devon and Cornwall) Act



1611- King James Bible - His Catholic Majesty James 1 explained in detail the Counter-Reformation Plan to mischaracterize and bilk the English Protestants in his publication, The Bounty Book, which was published in tandem with the King James Bible, ---which was adopted as the Bible for the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways, while the Protestant Geneva Bible remained the Bible adopted for use on dry Land. Quote James I, "It all begins with a False Registration...." http://annavonreitz.com/thefinalansweris.pdf



1618 - 30 years War Europe



1633 - Crown Lands Act + Monopolies Act



Charles I Stuart 1625–49



1641 - Rene Descartes a Jesuit taught, french philosopher publishes “Meditations on First Philosophy, in which the existence of God and the immortality of the soul are demonstrated”



It is this work that introduces the idea that the only thing that can be certain is that “I think, therefore I am”



This leads to the Cartesian Dualism conclusion that the universe contains two radically different kinds of substances - the mind or soul, defined as immaterial thinking and the body, defined as material and unthinking.



This idea is no longer considered correct by modern philosophy, however it was this idea that enabled someone’s body to be legally separate from their mind.



This outdated philosophy is a practice that continues to this day. As such it goes a long way to explain why there is so much confusion about the workings and rules of the legal system.

1642 - English Civil War


1648 - Treaty of Westphalia - Regarded by some as the first appearance of the Nation State, but opinion is divided and it is more of a time stamp according to Wikipedia.



Interregnum [Between Monarchs] (1649–59)

1649 - 53 No Head of State



Oliver Cromwell, Lord Protector 1653–58



1657 c.30 An Act for setling the Postage of England, Scotland and Ireland

https://www.gbps.org.uk/information/sources/acts/1657-06-09_Act-1657-Commonwealth-cap-30.php



Richard Cromwell, Lord Protector 1658–59




Charles II Stuart 1660–85



1660 - Post Office Act 1660 - (12 Cha 2 c.35, December 1660)

1661 - Corporation Act



1661 - An Act for a free and voluntary present to his Majesty 1661, CHAPTER 4 13 C 2 St 1



1662 - City of London Militia Act - (14 Car.2 c.3)



1662 - An Act for the the Better Relief of the Poor of This Kingdom - (14 Car.2 c.12) - The concept of “Settlements” as plantations of working poor controlled by the Church of England was further refined, including for the first time the issuance of “Settlement Certificates” equivalent to a “birth certificate, passport and social security” rolled into one document.



A child’s birthplace was its place of settlement, unless its mother had a settlement certificate from some other parish stating that the unborn child was included on the certificate.



However from the age of 7 upward the child could have been apprenticed and therefore “sold into servitude” for some rent paid back to the church as “poor taxes”.



The act also made it easier for the “clearing of common houses of the poor” and for the first time made the definition of poor the value of tenancy being a taxable value of less than £10 per year.



The act also modified the age of “emancipation” from child slavery to adult slavery as the age of 16; and



Under these draconian and morally repugnant dictates no one was allowed to move from town to town without the appropriate “Settlement Certificate”.



If a person entered a parish in which he or she did not have official settlement, and seemed likely to become chargeable to the new parish, then an examination would be made by the justices (or parish overseers).



From this examination on oath, the justices would determine if that person had the means to sustain himself. The results of the examination were documented in an Examination Paper.



As a result of the examination the intruder would then either be allowed to stay, or would be removed by means of what was known as a Removal Order, the origin of the modern equivalent of an “Eviction and Removal Notice” when a sheriff removes people from their home; and


1665 - Great Plague

1666 - Great Fire of London



1666 – The Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666 - The Great Fire of London creates the occasion for the creation of individual public trusts as a means of seizing private property: Sets forth the nature and construction of Roman Inferior Trusts in England to allow state management of property belonging of unknown survivors of the Black Death and the Fire of London.

More here again: http://annavonreitz.com/avaluablehistorylesson.pdf'>http://annavonreitz.com/avaluablehistorylesson.pdf



Current gov.uk version references ‘O.’ in ‘Statutes of the Realm’ in Trinity College

.



1667 - An Act for the Relief and setting to work of poor prisoners - (19 Car. 2 c.4) - The concept of “workhouses” were formalized and licensed as being effectively the very worst and hellish places where people considered “prisoners” could be “legally” and effectively worked to death for the profit of the elite pirates and thieves, under the full endorsement by the Church of England.



This is the act that invented the concept of “Employment” and an expansion of the highly profitable white slavery business models of English aristocracy.



Thus, people who were taken into custody by virtue of being poor, were expected to work as well as live in conditions as traumatic and evil as any in civilized history; and



1670 - Workhouses Act - 1670 (22 & 23 Car. 2 c.18) - The abuse of poor prisoners through the “workhouses” employment model was extremely profitable and a new act was required to regulate the corporations “renting” of prisoners as “employees” for profit, particularly in the paying of their accounts to the Crown.



1677 - Statute of Frauds



1679 - Habeus Corpus

1681 - Oaths of Minors Act - About minors being bonded and never coming into the country (‘contrary’ in the text!) https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aosp/1681/85/1991-02-01



James II Stuart 1685–88



1685 - Settlement of poor Act - (1 Jac.2. c. 17) Previous acts were continued and some made perpetual such as the controls over paperwork and “Settlement Certificates” as the origin and ancestor of Birth Certificates by James II as one of the few acts that the ruling elite permitted to remain as an active Statute of Westminster under his reign.



James abdicated and was replaced by Protestants from Holland

1688 - Coronation Oath Act https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMar/1/6

1688 - Great Seal Act https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMar/1/21/contents



William III and Mary II Orange/Stuart 1689–1702



1689 - English Bill of Rights - Concerns the abdication of James II and the rights of the English people and the restrictions on the Crown.



People’s rights include

Protestants (Non-catholics) have the right to bear arms
Freedom of speech
Reasonable terms for bail
No cruel or unusual punishments
No right to fines before conviction
Freedom of elections to Parliament
Trial by jury


Crown Restrictions include

No standing army without Parliament’s permission
No creation or enactment of laws by regal authority
No levying of money, other than agreed by Parliament
Ecclesiastical and other courts are illegal


No following statute can over-rule these rights - currently omitted on the UK government website



1689 - An Act for Reversing the Judgment in a Quo Warranto against the City of London and for Restoreing the City of London to its antient Rights and Priviledges. [ William and Mary, Chapter VIII. Rot. Parl. pt. 1. nu. 10.]

This confirms that the City of London is an independent city state. As it does not have a ‘democratic’ voting system, it has never been a member of the E.U.



1691 - Amending Settlement of Poor Act - (3 W. & M. c.11) Under William and Mary of Orange the acts of workhouses and abuse of the poor were continued and further refined, with greater oversight on paperwork and accounting for poor entering and leaving parishes, to prevent fraud by overseers and corporations.



1694 - (The Bank of England Act) - An Act for granting to theire Majesties severall Rates and Duties upon Tunnage of Shipps and Vessells and upon Beere Ale and other Liquors for secureing certaine Recompenses and Advantages in the said Act mentioned to such Persons as shall voluntarily advance the summe of [£1,500,000] towards the carrying on the Warr against France - https://www.british-history.ac.uk/statutes-realm/vol6/pp483-495



In case you don’t understand how banks become so rich consider this:



According to a legal dictionary money is ‘gold or silver coin of the realm embossed with the monarch’s image’

You start a bank with no money, but just an impenetrable building, some henchmen and a cunning plan.

Initially you charge people to keep their money safe.



You do a good job, but they still have to take their money out to pay for things and at this point it can be stolen.

So you offer a service where they write a cheque to another person and the bank transfers the money from one strong box to another.

After a while everybody thinks the bank has money of its own, but it doesn’t, it just looks after money.

Because people don’t often withdraw their money and it is also believed the bank owns money, the bank can now offer loans by ‘borrowing’ from its customers without them knowing.

The bank simply writes a credit note to a person, they then write a cheque to whoever they are buying something from and the recipient thinks that the bank has transferred the money to their (the recipients) strong box. But of course they haven’t as that money has just been created from thin air.

If the recipient wants the gold, the bank just takes it from other strong boxes and puts it back when the original borrower pays their loan and interest back in real money.

Now imagine that only 10% of the money is ever taken out, this means that the bank could ‘play’ with money that it doesn’t own.

Here’s the really cunning bit. Let's say a bank fraudulently loans out £100 to ten people and charges 10% interest just by using credit notes.

At the beginning of the year the bank has no money of its own, but at the end it will have £100 and money of its own to lend out.

It can now lend that £100 pounds out ten times over as well as the depositors money. So at the end of the second year it has doubled its own money as well as once again doubling that of its depositors - without them knowing - so it just pockets the money.

Because the bank is a private enterprise it is possible to siphon off vast amounts of profits for personal gain.

In less than half a century this regular doubling will lead to the banks owners squirreling away a unimaginable fortune - all in gold remember. They lend out paper and demand gold in return.

If too many people want their money back at the same time, the bank can’t pay and so goes bankrupt, leaving the depositors with little return but the owners with their billions.

The bank owners use their private wealth to buy political favour, control interest rates and install their bank in other lands and make it the national bank or if others don’t agree to the carrot, they use the stick of threatened violence against friends or family.

Finally, they decide they don’t want anybody getting their gold back, so they persuade politicians to pass a law in their favour ‘for the good of the country’. See the later banking Acts.

Now who do you think the real government is?





1694 - December 28 - Mary dies



William III Orange 1694 - 1702



1695 - The Bank of England began issuing notes in 1695 with the promise to pay the bearer the value of the note on demand in specie (gold or silver coin).



1697 - Poor Apprentices Act - (8 & 9 W. c.30) - One of the more horrific of the wicked and morally repugnant acts of Westminster was the introduction (in §2) “Poor receiving Alms to Wear a Badge” - The “badge” of the poor was the letter “P” to be worn at all times on the shoulder of the right sleeve.



The first examples of badges as a stigma to status is most likely this act.



The use of the “P” as a form of curse and stigma is the same model of modern passports for citizens listed as “P” (Paupers, Poor, Peasant, Prisoners, Property, Peon, Passenger) used today. See 2010 / 2021.



1698 - The Poor Act - (9 & 10 Will, 3 c.11) - This act reinforced the measurement of the poor being one who does not have an annual lease taxable at ten pounds or more. This made more than 95% of the population of England, Wales, Ireland and Scotland “poor” at that time.


1689 - Crown and Parliament Recognition Act 1689 - https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/WillandMar/2/1



1701 - Act of settlement -



Anne Stuart 1702–14

1702 - Crown Lands Act - (1 Ann, 1 c.1) - https://www.legislation.gov.uk/aep/Ann/1/1/contents



1702 – Maritime Wagering Act - The British Crown and Dutch East India Company collude under Maritime Wagering Act. Living men are deemed to be “vessels” and insured. Their death/loss becomes a means of enrichment for the commercial corporations and the British Government.



Although there is no reference to this on the web, it is unnecessary, as the word “vessel” can be found to refer to a person (‘body corporate’ in legal terms) in the majority of, if not all, dictionaries. In later Acts the word vessel is replaced with ‘ship’ and possibly even ‘house-boat’



1702 - Relief of Poor Prisoners for Debt - (1 Ann St.1 c.25)


1702 - Union with Scotland



1707 - The Cestui Que Vie Act 1707 - (6 Ann c.72) (Originally 6 Ann. c.18?) - Roman Inferior Estate Trust





1713 - (12 Ann. S.1 c.18) - The extension of Settlement Certificates -

https://filippomsposini.files.wordpress.com/2019/09/1712-poor-act.pdf

[Originally in An Act for the Better Relief of the Poor of This Kingdom - (13 & 14 Car. 2 c.??)] as a form of negotiable Security was introduced for the first time (and continues with Birth Certificates today) whereby those born in a place but without a Settlement Certificate (including women and children), could be moved to a different location, such as a commercial workhouse when the “cost” of such certificates were purchased by a corporation.

As the lifetime’s labour output of someone in the workhouse could be estimated, the Crown could borrow money against their future ‘domestic product’. This practice continues today, with the borrowing taking place against your future tax payments. Basically someone is borrowing money and you have to pay it back.




1713 - Wreck of the Sea Act 1713 - 12 Ann. Stat.2 c.18 (Ann. 13 c.21) - An Act for the preserving all such Ships and Goods thereof, which shall happen to be forced on Shore, or stranded upon the Coasts of this Kingdom, or any other of Her Majesty's Dominions.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DWR6YLYshVNYip8ZgOzEl8e4bxhMbUjYFW7ii5jYtiE/edit?usp=sharing


Looks like an act to discourage wrecking, until you realise that the salvaged ship is in fact a ‘person’ with a name similar to what you are called and answer to. But they keep this secret and use it to charge your part of the national estate that was part of the Settlements act. They then keep that secret too and get you to pay again.



George I Hanover 1714–27

1716 - Bank of England Act



1719 - Excise Act 1719 - 6 Geo 1 c 21



1722 - An Act for Amending the Laws relating to the Settlement, Employment, and Relief of the Poor - (9 Geo.1 c.7) - Due to the increase in the number of “poor”, in which those who had been thrown out of their homes or had their land seized by pirates and thieves operating with endorsement of Westminster and who sought relief from the Church to stay alive now had to “compete” to enter into a workhouse to survive.



Furthermore, the act expanded the ability for a wide variety of business owners to contract with churchwardens for the rent and use of the poor as “indentured servants” and “apprentices”.



George II Hanover 1727–60



1727 - Demise of the Crown Act



1733 - (6 Geo.2 c.32) - One of the most inhumane and barbaric edicts in history was issued by Westminster (and remains an underlying pillar of the slave system today), whereby poor people who could not purchase a “license” to be considered married, would have their children deemed “bastards” and such children could then be seized by Churchwardens and “sold”.



Thus the baby slave trade was born and fully endorsed by the Church of England and British Society.



1750 - Constables Protection Act -


1754/56 - 1763 Seven Years War / French and (North American) Indian War World’s first “Central Bank ” created in Prussia to control commodity prices.



1758 - de Vattel publishes Law of Nations - a nation is a ‘person’ in law



George III Hanover 1760–1820


1761 - (2 Geo.3 c.22), https://www.londonlives.org/static/RI.jsp#fnr1_2 Westminster declared that all poor as mental “infants” and too stupid to realize the underlying system of slavery and complicity of the Christian Churches, were now to be cursed and doomed as “dead in law” by their registration in the Bills of Mortality and the creation of the “civil birth” rituals being rituals of death that continue today within modern hospitals and registration of new born babies.

There is a central register (I have evidence but not sure where at the moment) of ‘deaths’ which can be changed at will, should anyone request permission to see it. Once the register entry has been seen, it can then be changed back again.



This was further reinforced with the act in 1767



https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=DV0XAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA107&lpg=PA107&dq=An+Act+for+the+keeping+regular,+uniform+and+annual+Registers,+of+all+Parish+Poor+Infants+under+a+certain+Age&source=bl&ots=6gdRGpJtsr&sig=ACfU3U1rLpc5PFPBpvdv0FHXyutqsp3LRA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj8nNGa1ebqAhURXhUIHfFJDGsQ6AEwBXoECAgQAQ#v=snippet&; q=geo%20%20III%20cap%2022&f=false



that poor children were to be registered and considered “dead in law”



18. And be it further enacted, by the Authority aforesaid, That the abstract of the register of the said infant poor shall be according to the Schedule hereunto annexed marked (D).

If you read the Schedule you will see that (D) means dead.



1765 – The pollution of English Common Law with Admiralty Law to create “Equity

Law” granting absolute power to the judiciary to seize upon and distribute private

property comes to fruition in England under Lord Mansfield



1765 - Isle of Man Purchase Act 1765 - 5 Geo. 3 c. 26, also known as the Act of Revestment, purchased the feudal rights of the Dukes of Atholl as Lords of Man over the Isle of Man, and revested them into the British Crown.

This allowed the Isle of Man to become a tax haven and allowed the British Monarch to assume the title ‘Lord of Man’

1773 - Inclosure Act 1773 - (13 Geo.3 c.81)

1797 - Bank Restriction Act - (37 Geo. III. c. 45) - British banknotes were overprinted (greater value issued than was held on reserve) by the government of William Pitt the Younger after Britain declared war on revolutionary France in 1793.



The passing of the Bank Restriction Act released the government from the fear of mass redemption of such convertible banknotes, and by the end of the war in 1814, the banknotes in circulation had a face value of £28.4 million, yet was backed by only £2.2 million of gold.



https://branchcollective.org/?ps_articles=mark-crosby-the-bank-restriction-act-1797-and-banknote-forgery

Also - https://www.nytimes.com/1862/01/27/archives/war-finance-in-england-the-bank-restriction-act-of-1797suspension.html

1800 - Union with Ireland Act -
Crown Private Estate Act



1801 - Inclosure Consolidation Act 1801 - (41 Geo.3 c.109) -



English Parliament effectively “privatized” massive amounts of common land for the benefit of a few, causing huge numbers of land peasants to become “landless paupers” and therefore in need of parish assistance.



Previously, in America, this caused massive rebellion as well as in Ireland and Scotland and contributed to forming a Patriot militia leading to the “War of Independence”. Almost the entire Patriot militia were deceived, captured and executed in New York (in 1777) under a deal between George Washington of the United Company of Merchants Blue Army and General Cornwalis of the East India Company Red Army.



The Americans were therefore fooled into thinking that they had won independence



The Inclosure Acts are the foundation of Land Title as it is known today; and



(xviii) Because of the deliberate "legal" theft of land under parliamentary Inclosure laws of the late 18th and early 19th Century, the number of paupers dramatically increased. This led to the most awful and cruel laws being introduced to deliver to an elite few, the slave labor force needed for the industrial revolution through the Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) which effectively stated that the poor could not receive any benefit unless they were constantly "employed" in a workhouse prison. Thus, despite international treaties against slavery, the very worst slavery being "wage slavery" or "lawful slavery" was born whereby men, women and children lived in terrible conditions and were worked "to death".

1807 - Slave Trade Abolition Act - 47 GE0 III, SESSION 1, CAP. 36 - http://www.esp.org/foundations/freedom/holdings/slave-trade-act-1807.pdf



1815 - Stamp Act



1815 - The Bank of England is deliberately bankrupted immediately after the battle of Waterloo by perfectly legitimate, if devious, means.

https://concisepolitics.com/2017/09/22/timeline-of-england-and-city-of-london-the-crown/


An agent of a well known international banking family is at the Battle of Waterloo. Immediately after Napoleon's defeat to the Duke of Wellington a courier leaves for London with the news, in order to get there ahead of the ‘official’ agent of the Duke of Wellington.



By getting there first there is potentially a vast fortune to be made in financial markets before there is official news of the result of the battle.



Up till this time the bankers were rich individuals who made their money available to the bank for a return of interest. The bank itself had little money, it was just a centralised lending institution. The bank issued bonds on the back of these investments



The bankruptcy was then brought about by bankers selling bonds as if they had knowledge of the result of the battle. They sold them quickly at low prices, which suggested that Wellington had lost and Napoleon could now invade.



However the cunning bankers who instigated the ‘fire sale’ sold them cheaply to their own agents, knowing full well Napoleon had lost..

There was a selling frenzy amongst the other investors and the agents in the know bought up virtually all the bonds for about 1% of their worth.



A day later official word reaches London that Wellington beat Napoleon and the country is safe.

However, the bankers are now broke as they sold their bonds so cheaply and one family controls all the money.





1816 - The King of England loses the 3rd Crown, due to the deliberate bankruptcy of England following the Battle of Waterloo.



But the 3rd Crown doesn’t actually go very far.



The 3rd Crown is granted to the Temple Bar in the City of London (claiming to be a separate city state and not part of England since 1066) which became known as the Crown Bar, or simply the Crown.



The Bar Associations have since been responsible for administering the “reaping” of the souls of the lost and damned, including the registration and collection of Baptismal certificates representing the souls collected by the Vatican and stored in its vaults.

1816 - Coinage Act 1816 - 56 Geo. III c.68 - A great currency reset - All lawful money in the form of gold and silver coins was collected and melted down and new coinage issued in its place and termed legal tender. This meant that it was now all in control of the single family, privately run Bank of England



1816 - Habeus Corpus



1819 - Dean Forest Act

Crown Land Act


George IV Hanover 1820–30



1820 - Militia City of London Act



1821 - Cinque Ports Act 1821

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo4/1-2/76/section/XIX/enacted



1822 - A digest of the public general statutes from the Magna Charta a.d 1224-5 to 1 & 2 Geo. 4 a.d. 1821 - by Tyrwhitt and Tyndale of The Middle Temple - https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=36RFAAAAcAAJ&pg=PR50&lpg=PR50&dq=%2219+Car.+2%22+c.4+1667&source=bl&ots=VP4fMzrxSC&sig=ACfU3U3saXau8FiWDhwTXzfFXQVMWQpeFw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjs_oqUwv_qAhWUh1wKHeZoAqMQ6AEwEHoECAgQAQ#v=snippet&q=wreck&f=false

Preface - page vi - admits that not all acts are shown with an excuse that they are not relevant to the purpose of the work.



This can explain the reason that the Maritime Wagering Act cannot be found.



1822 – The then-Pope and then-British Monarch secretly colluded to act in Breach of Trust against the Americans and signed the secret Treaty of Verona.



1825 - Juries Act - https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo4/6/50/contents





1826 - Aliens Registration Act
https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/commons/1826/apr/20/aliens-registration-bill

https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/+/http://www.movinghere.org.uk/deliveryfiles/PRO/Registration_of_Aliens_Act_1826/0/1.pdf




William IV Hanover 1830–37



1834 - Parliament burns down, due to burning six centuries of financial records kept on Tally Sticks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tally_stick#Split_tally



1834 - Poor Law Amendment Act (1834) - (5 & 6 Will.4 c.76) - http://www.workhouses.org.uk/poorlaws/1834act.shtml This effectively stated that the poor could not receive any benefit unless they were constantly “employed” in a workhouse prison. Most importantly, much of the inhuman, barbaric and wholly immoral and sacrilegious framework of dictates and edicts of Westminster remained in force and were not repealed by this act.



Thus, despite international treaties against slavery, the very worst slavery being “wage slavery” or “lawful slavery” was born whereby men, women and children lived in terrible conditions and were continued to be worked “to death”.



See also https://www.gutenberg.org/files/43472/43472-h/43472-h.htm English Poor Law Policy (report 1910)




1835 - Merchant Seamen Act 1835 - (5 & 6 Wm IV c 19) - (Sir James Graham’s Act) - An Act to Amend and Consolidate the laws relating to Merchant Seamen of the United Kingdom, and for forming and maintaining a register of all the men engaged in that service under the scrutiny of the Board of Trade. - Boys over the age of 13 can be Apprenticed to any ship anywhere in the land if they so agree - (It’s either that or the potential of remaining in the poor house for life.)



1835 - Municipal Reform Act - (5 & 6 Wm IV c 76) https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783598440526.247/pdf



1836 - The Births and Deaths Registration Act - (1836) - (6 & 7 Will.4 c.86) This created the General Register Office and the requirement for uniform records of births, deaths and marriages across the Empire by Municipal Councils and Unions of Parishes.



Victoria Hanover 1837–1901

Piracy Act 1837



1837 - July 1st - The British Settlement Act sets aside public wastelands as “common wealth” and paupers are said to be settled upon this land, thus becoming wards of the state. This effectively prevents the lower classes from ever being landlords and provides a basis for claiming them as chattel property.



The Birth Certificate was formed as the successor of the Settlement Certificate for all “paupers” disenfranchised of their land birthright to be considered lawful (“voluntary”) slaves with benefits provided by the local parish / region underwritten by the Society of Lloyds as it is still today.



1837 - Harbours, Piers and Ferries (Scotland) Act -



1837 - The Slave Compensation Act 1837 - (1 & 2 Vict. c. 3) - was the world's first major act of compensated emancipation and an Act of Parliament in the United Kingdom, signed into law on 23 December 1837. It authorised the Commissioners for the Reduction of the National Debt to compensate slave owners in the British colonies of the Caribbean, Mauritius, and the Cape of Good Hope in the amount of approximately £20 million for freed slaves. Based on a government census of 1 August 1834, over 40,000 awards to slave owners were issued. Since som

Richard Milhous Nixon v Thirteen Needed Actions
By Anna Von Reitz


Richard M. Nixon is, of course, most famous for Watergate, a scandal that by today's standards is utterly trivial.

The overall depth of criminality has increased so exponentially since the early 1970's and our own social morality has been degraded to such an extent, that Nixon's trespasses would not elicit the flicker of an eyebrow now.

The literal fact that this is a true appraisal of our condition, and not merely the ranting of a curmudgeon bewailing the loss of an idealized past, is easily demonstrated.

We have proof that the Obummer Whitehouse bugged Donald Trump's Campaign Headquarters in 2016 and listened into every planning session, and we have done nothing whatsoever about it. It hasn't even been widely discussed.

It's a straight across the board replay of what the Nixon Whitehouse did, comparable in all respects, yet nobody is going to jail. Obama wasn't hounded out of the Whitehouse in disgrace. Everyone including Tucker Babcock looked the other way.

Oh, another Watergate.... that's too bland. Not exciting enough. Nobody wants to hear that story again, even with new players filling all the same roles. It's like a follow-up rendition of a Broadway play or classic movie. Besides, this time around, the villain is a Democrat.

The ineluctable truth that what was wrong in the past is still wrong today seems to have bypassed everyone, and especially what passes for the media.
No Carl Bernsteins, no Robert Woodwards now. Just smug, ugly little hussies blathering about nonsense, all blissfully unaware of anything approaching substance or meaning or, God forbid, morality, justice, or fair-play.

Those concepts have been lost to our detriment as a nation, and have been replaced with bang-bang computer games and a strange disconnectedness from reality. It doesn't occur to the denizens of this semi-imaginary world that what they do to others will come back to haunt them.

It's all just a game, until the inevitable payback smacks their noses into a concrete floor.

Still, when we look back, we need to admit even harder things. We need to admit that Nixon's Watergate adventures, bad as they were, were among the least of his sins -- sins that have come to fruition in the current day.

Let's examine the big three: (1) the Petrodollar; (2) the conversion of health care into a for-profit corporate venue; (3) state-sponsored Black Ops.

All these things and their predictable results have been visited upon us by one man without a conscience, one man without any common sense, Richard Millhous Nixon.

The Petrodollar has been an illegal and immoral two-sided commodity rigging scheme from the start, and the only thing special or different about it, is that it involved two commodities, crude oil and Federal Reserve Notes, not one.

The Arabs agreed to require everyone to pay for their oil in Federal Reserve Notes and to invest in US Treasury Bonds. Nixon agreed to buy all the crude oil they could send him with favorable price guarantees and promised not to develop American crude oil resources that would otherwise compete with oil supplies from the Middle East.

In this way, not just any commodity, but a vital commodity, one that people depend upon for heat, lights, and transportation, was ensnared in a commodity rigging scheme that favored the Arabs and the US Corp --- and nobody else.

The only other time in the history of the world that a "vital commodity" --- one needed to support life itself -- has been ensnared like this, is when salt supplies were monopolized by the Roman Empire.

There has been a long-standing though unspoken prohibition against hitting people where it hurts, and our monetary systems have accordingly focused on non-vital commodities, gold, silver, gems, and other baubles that nobody actually needs in order to live.

Nixon blew past that honorable prohibition without a second glance.

No, in Tricky Dick's sick and twisted little corporate mind, he had everyone by the cajones and he was going to make the most of it. Men like him, men with no conscience, no sense of morality, were delighted and right on board. They lapped up the insane profits like so many rabid dogs, and put gag orders on the media so that the American General Public would never really know what the "Petrodollar" was.

We endured five decades of listening to the media harping endlessly about "oil shortages" and hype designed to make us believe that oil supplies were limited and non-renewable resources. We were even told that oil was the fossilized residue of dinosaur blood, bone, and tissues.

And, of course, it was all tripe. Ripe tripe.

Nobody mentioned that the "oil shortage" referred to crude oil, which was needed by our refineries as the feedstock to make value-added products from oil -- motor oil, gasoline, jet fuel, naptha, benzene and other cyclic hydrocarbons, inorganic fertilizers, solvents, plastics....

Nobody told the American Public, which was living in fear of "oil shortages" that the whole time this media meme was playing: (1) we were among the top two exporters of refined oil products in the world; (2) that oil is -- and has always been known to be -- a naturally occurring (and renewing) inorganic mineral byproduct of the Earth's crust; and (3) we, Americans, are sitting on oil reserves that make the Saudi reserves look like their bathtub compared to our lake.

Even now, there are charlatans that consider Donald Trump a pariah for opening up American oil reserves to provide abundant and inexpensive oil products for Americans.

What a concept!

The point is that the Petrodollar hit everyone but the Middle East and the US Corporation below the belt. It forced all the other countries to give away their own national currencies in exchange for Federal Reserve Notes. Otherwise they had very limited means to buy oil, which they needed for heat, lights, and transportation--- things that both businesses and individuals need to survive-- at least until Tesla's vision of free energy comes online.

The whole world was put between a rock and a hard place by the Petrodollar and one of the most ruthless monopolies since the Roman monopoly on salt was used to bleed everyone dry.

Richard Nixon and his cronies considered this "good business". The Sheiks, for the most part, adopted the same attitude. Of all the oil-producing countries, only Libya and some of the very small members of the Emirates saw the windfall as a means for social and economic and environmental progress for their country and their people.

Diamond-studded Rolls-Royces and English countryside estates were more typical investments for the Sheiks than new hospitals, roads, schools, or even oilfield equipment. Other people would have to risk their money developing oil pumping capacity.

Eventually, faced with this selfishness and short-sightedness on the part of their own rulers, but prohibited by law and tradition from criticizing them, the common people of the Middle East turned their wrath on the "Americans"-- that is, the US Corporation and the oil companies that were investing in their oilfields.

Outraged youth not understanding any of the dynamics causing their impoverishment in the midst of plenty, imagined that this was a matter of religion instead of economics and bad personal morals -- and the Mullahs, perhaps as ignorant of such things as the youths, joined in the idea of a Holy War against the greedy infidels.

Richard Millhous Nixon and the men like him were pleased. They funded the Muslim insurrectionists and jihadists with glee. They hired men like Osama bin Laden and Yasir Arafat to stir the pot. They paid for acts of terrorism.

Why? Because it interrupted the supply of oil and jacked prices skyhigh. Because it gave them an excuse to roll in and take over entire countries and steal the oil outright.

These are not nice men. They have no conscience. They are criminals in good suits, who know how to shake hands and smile, while stabbing others in the back. And they are good at it, too.

Just remember Dubbya standing there looking like a schoolboy, ranting about "weapons of mass destruction" ----knowing for a fact that he knew there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq even as he was saying it.

Like Richard Millhous Nixon, Dubbya didn't give a damn. He didn't care about Iraq or the Iraqi people. He didn't even care about the Americans who would die and be poisoned during both Iraq I and II. All that man cared about was manipulating the oil market, and he actually thought he was doing the right thing for the country, too.

No conscience. No moral compass. No common sense. No clue what "good business" might actually mean. And that's the kind of men that both political parties have been producing and ensconcing as "Presidents" for the last sixteen decades.

Another one of Nixon's "gifts", besides the Petrodollar, was the privatization of the Health Sector industries in this country, converting non-profit hospitals into avaricious investment-mongering corporate capitalist behemoths, eager to collude with politicians and insurance executives to bilk the American Public sideways in the name of good health and science.

And that is what has inexorably led to the current genocide and the whole scandalous situation with WHO, INC., and the redefinition of "vaccines" allowing these monsters to spread disease and death for their own profit and coercive power.

No doctor or hospital ever made a profit off a healthy man, so their profit motive has been to create more disease, more pain, more injuries --- certainly not to cure anything, ever, which is precisely why, until Richard Nixon, our Health Care Sector was strictly non-profit.

All that changed thanks to Tricky Dick. One of Nixon's best friends and most avid campaign contributors was the head of Kaiser Permanente. This bosom buddy of Nixon's was slavering, champing at the bit, begging for Nixon to open up the Health Care Sector to "private investment".

By that he meant incorporate all the hospitals that received Federal funding as commercial corporation franchises of the US Corporation, so that they would have to do whatever Nixon and Pals dictated, and force the doctors to do whatever they wanted them to do, including dictating which drugs they could prescribe and what protocols they could follow.

And then, once that was accomplished, throw the doors wide open to "private investment" in these new hospital and care facility corporate franchises, so that a lot of private investors would be helping to foot the bill for this US Corporation takeover of the Health Care Sector of our economy.

Once all the private investors and investment funds were in it up to their necks, the whole set up would be set in cement and the US Corporation would have a permanent stranglehold on health care and health care services and every licensed health care provider in the whole country.

It would be a gold mine as Nixon realized, however, a gold mine that has predictably resulted in investing in things that cause chronic diseases--- for profit. The entire focus has shifted from health to disease over the course of five decades, and if anything, this process is picking up speed.

Let's take the example of a familiar childhood disease: Chickenpox.

Chickenpox in children is a virulent, obnoxious, non-fatal illness amounting to a couple days of fever and an itchy rash. If it is encountered later in life for the first time, it can have far more serious effects.

However and whenever Chickenpox enters our bodily system, it stays there, permanently. And whether we are vaccinated for it or not, it causes trouble for the rest of our lives.

Chickenpox not only causes the familiar childhood disease, it causes and/or exacerbates a host of chronic ailments including cold sores, psoriasis, eczema, degenerative disc disease, colitis, arthritis, shingles, and a variety of other more arcane problems associated with collagen collapse and dysfunction.

Chickenpox is a true "producer" for the Health Care Sector, which means that everyone must be vaccinated against Chickenpox. And nobody can be told that a simple supplement, L-Lysine, an essential amino acid, will restore balance to the collagen system and suppress the ill-effects of chickenpox.

So by making sure that everyone has chickenpox in their system via uniform vaccination programs, and simply suppressing knowledge of and access to the cure, the Health Industry rakes in billions upon billions of dollars of profit from a captive audience every single year.

It's the same way with the Great Cash Cow Cancer, which replaced Tuberculosis as the savior of modern medicine.

Cancer has been cured at least five (5) times and yet, we keep stumbling around trying to find our butts with both hands --- and will continue to do so, as long as we pour hundreds of billions of dollars into cancer research, cancer treatment, cancer therapies, and cancer medicines.

These hospitals, universities and research programs are lapping up the cream and have absolutely no motive to ever find a cure for cancer or any other disease. What they search for instead, is expensive palliative care-- patented drugs and therapies that "prolong life" and suppress symptoms, that is, partial solutions that allow them to milk the victims and their health insurance programs for a longer period of time.

This is why we spend ten times more on Health Care than any other country in the world and have more chronic disease than any other population.

We are funding our own misery and demise and creating a Disease Care System instead of a Health Care System, and it is all thanks to Richard Millhous Nixon, Kaiser Permanente, and the conversion of our non-profit Health Care Sector into an enfranchised for-profit nightmare.

Once again, no conscience. No common sense. No consideration for anyone or anything but the "bottom line". Men who are as predatory, mindless, and calculating as snakes striking at a wood chip. And they are the ones we have promoted, voted for, and put in control of our world because they make money no matter how they make it or at what cost.

It is long past time for all the rest of us to jerk awake and stop this idiocy. Liquidate the corporations responsible for this mess. Change the laws back to make the Health Care Sector non-profit again. Voluntarily end the Petrodollar monopoly. Develop our own oil to the extent that we need to and regain our once-ironclad international reputation for being Good Neighbors and reliable business partners.

The US Corporation has created a lot of wealth for a tiny percentage of people at the expense of all the rest. It has engaged in every unlawful activity there is. It has undermined and usurped against our lawful government. And the USA, Inc., the other large Municipal Corporation housed in the District of Columbia is no better.

Nixon weaponized both these huge corporations to engage in "Black Ops", assisted by dozens of "National Security" organizations and agencies, a move that was later institutionalized by following Administrations, and that has resulted in more crimes committed by the "government of the government" in this country than any government since the Nazi Fourth Reich.

Overturning other lawfully elected governments in other countries became as commonplace as "flipping houses" for profit. It's inevitable that the same Bad Boys would hit upon the idea of overturning our government as well, something that they have had in the works and been planning for some time.

The creation of a Mercenary Army which took place here during the fraudulent American Civil War combined with the ability to hire civilian experts and commandeer entire Agencies, has led to Black Ops of every possible kind. It has led to propaganda, mind control experiments, exponential increases in mental illness, drug addiction, alcohol addiction, debased moral standards, corrupt courts, corrupt police, laser cannons, and lawless cynicism on display on every street corner.

The whole political bureaucracy from stem to stern is rotten, top heavy, corrupt, and set to burn. The only possible source of hope, renewal, decency, and common sense must come from the people of this country, and not the hirelings who have so far misled, betrayed, and misrepresented us.

But, but, but, Anna, how can we do this?

1. We stand up the actual lawful government of this country -- a process we are already well started on. We call our State Assemblies into Session. We are guaranteed the right to do this, and the whole world knows that we are. As long as we keep our temper and do this in a peaceful and orderly manner, we can't be stopped.

2. We stand up our own traditional American Common Law Courts, which are courts of general jurisdiction, able to address any matter that comes before them.

3. We expose the nature of the problem. We call out the Pope, who technically owns every corporation on Earth, and we invoke the Ecclesiastical Law which all these corporations are subject to, and which clearly provides that corporations are allowed to exist and be organized for lawful purposes --- not merely legal purposes.

4. We liquidate the worst offenders -- Microsoft, Google, BBC, Pfizer, Bayer-Monsanto, Alphabet, Inc., SERCO, UN CORP, WHO, take your pick. Make examples of them so that the others get the idea and learn the words "lawful operations" again.

5. We roto-rooter the Patent Offices in the US, Germany, Japan, Italy, and France and revoke all the outrageous criminal patents that have been issued for evil inventions and processes. We prevent the criminals from legally profiting from their crimes.

6. We open up a completely new banking system for the world and open up the world economy, making modern banking services available to everyone everywhere. We return purloined credit and physical and material assets to the actual owners, the living people. We redefine the goals of the new economy and the old military industrial complex, both.

7. From now on, the only things we fight are the true enemies of mankind: poverty, ignorance, sloth, gluttony, avarice, falsehood, disease, pollution, selfishness, pride, recklessness, uncaring, deceit, false values, idolatry, and all the other things that make us sick, crippled, and miserable.

8. We willingly end the Petrodollar monopoly, realizing that monopolies are evil and consuming and unnatural -- especially monopolies that restrict access to vital commodities that people need in order to live. We resolve to never again restrict a vital commodity. We recoup our physical and material assets and our credit and use our resources to create a safe and reasonable means to transition out of the Petrodollar system.

9. We expose the British Territorial "Empire" and the Empire of the City (Rome) and the villains responsible for this madness, so that everyone can see how these crooked hypocrites have insinuated themselves and usurped upon people who hired them to provide specific services--people who were, and are, owed good faith service under contract. Let the world see for themselves how the Americans, Canadians, Aussies, all of Western Europe, and Japan have been used and abused by these criminals. Give them no choice but to make whatever amends they can, to all of us, and to their own people, too---or be recognized throughout the world as crooks that nobody wants to do business with. We note that the English, Irish, Scots, and Welsh have suffered longer from this scourge than everyone else and they have been helpless against it. So we close ranks and advance the cause of the living people over the profiteering of dead incorporated entities.

10. We outlaw political parties and political party elections in which party cronies select the candidates that we are then more-or-less forced to elect. We stand up our actual elections again and fill our Public Offices and consider the whole range of possible candidates. We realize that the corrupt political parties are the reason we can't get decent men and women to fill Public Offices.

11. We, the General Public, stop underwriting municipal and commercial corporations that are involved in criminal activities of any kind. This prohibition stands against corporations that engage in wars for profit, produce harmful drugs, suppress Natural Rights under color of law, securitize living flesh, or otherwise engage in activities that are self-evidently against the Public Interest and against the Public Good and which harm individual people.

12. We revitalize the Public School and University Systems and give all control over curriculum back to the local people and their governments, while providing them with ample incentives and support to compete against other educational and skill building systems worldwide. We adopt a "learning to learn" strategy, calculated to encourage and reward lifetime learning and improve analytic and problem-solving skills.

13. We encourage individual expression and protect individual rights, to provide a secure and loving environment in which people can excel and live their lives to the fullest and enjoy the fruits of their labor and creativity without interference, so long as they respect the equal rights of others and cause no harm.

These thirteen points, one for each original American State, cover 90% of what is currently wrong in our world, providing clear direction, identifying action items and goals, as well as describing -- in very simple terms -- the desired and logical results.

Join us. Join us in saying, "Done with evil!" and say good-bye to the nasty, narrow, ugly, violent world created, largely, by Richard Milhous Nixon. There is nothing worthwhile to lose and everything to gain from learning from our mistakes.

----------------------------

See this article and over 4300 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com