People

Sorry, no results were found.

Circles

Sorry, no results were found.

Posts

Was the Constitution Sold on a Lie? Shays' Rebellion and Ratification

https://www.brighteon.com/dc7dbaf5-1c79-450a-b069-db02ad319ab4

Shays' Rebellion was repeatedly cited by Federalists as a primary reason to replace the Articles of Confederation with a Constitution with a stronger central government. But what if the threat was exaggerated? Anti-Federalists sure thought so. In this episode, we'll dive into the debate and explore James Madison's surprising later admission about this pivotal moment in American historyPath to Liberty, Fast Friday Edition: June 21, 2024

www.brighteon.com

01/07/2024

International Public Notice -- Insurrection by Usurpation
By Anna Von Reitz


Mr. Trump has been arrested and accused of various things, some of which could conceivably amount to insurrection --- but, insurrection against what?

The unlawfully and illegally constructed "independent international city-state" known as the Municipality of Washington, DC, is the purported object of this "insurrection", but this independent, international city-state has no solid right to exist, and even if it did, Mr. Trump would owe it no duty, except perhaps to protect it as a Possession of The United States.

This entity, the independent, international city-state of Washington, DC, sits in the middle of the District of Columbia as a foreign country plopped down in the middle of a foreign territory known as the District of Columbia, which is itself situated in the middle of our Eastern Seaboard on land actually owned by our States, Virginia and Maryland.

So we have two problem tenants, one of which was never intended to exist.

The independent international city-state was created by members of Congress who exercised their supposed "plenary" control over the Federal Capitol City, the City of Washington, DC, and turned it into their very own little foreign country -- the independent international city-state of Washington, DC, which, obviously, as a city-state, operates under its own Municipal Law.

This independent international city-state is exactly like Vatican City and the Inner City of London in its construction. It has its own flag. It claims to sit on its own ground and to have its own government. It also claims to have a service contract called The Constitution of the United States, which allows its personnel to be here under the terms of The Residence Act.

We don't agree with this interpretation of the circumstance, and we are in a position to know.

It's true that the Federal Constitution granted the members of Congress "plenary control" over the Federal Capitol (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17).

However -- which Federal Congress was this plenary power granted to?

It was granted to the American Federal Congress created in 1787.

---Not the British Territorial Congress created in 1789.

---Not the Papist Municipal Government Congress created in 1790.

The actual Federal Constitution adopted in 1787 granted the American Federal Congress plenary control over the Federal Capitol --- and that's not the same as the British Territorial Congress (created in 1789) or the Papist Municipal Congress (created in 1790) that messed around and decided to create an extra little country for itself.

Think about it.

Would our States give plenary control of our Federal Capitol to a foreign subcontractor? Or to their own American subcontractor?

Members of a different and unintended "Congress" exercised a delegated power never intended for it, and used this purloined delegated power to create a separate country -- a self-proclaimed "independent, international city-state" in our midst.

The men and women who did this were acting in insurrection and usurpation against our country in violation of their intended constitutional limitations -- and they knew it when they did it. Since then, these same criminals and miscreants have embarked on a world-spanning rampage of war-for-profit abroad, and ever-increasing criminality on our shores.

It was, and is, blatant treason and insurrection against the actual government of this country and the account holder that has been paying for all their "services".

Taking action against an illegally constructed foreign government -- an independent, international city-state run by members of Congress -- that is usurping against the actual government of this country and using purloined authority to do so, is the duty of the "President" of the United States of America, our British Territorial Subcontractor.

Not only is Mr. Trump right to take action against it, but every American has the same right and duty.

The people who should, under this circumstance, be tried for both treason and insurrection, are the members of the Congress who committed this gross overreach.

The then-Pope and the former Queen both had ample opportunity to contemplate this gross malfeasance of their operatives in this country and the extremely questionable standing of this foreign city-state, but they did not repent these errors.

Their attitude appeared to be, well, we got away with it, and until someone forces us back in our box, tough titties. Most Americans are too stupid to realize what we've done, so....

Still, a fraud is a fraud and an usurpation is an usurpation; exercise of purloined delegated power is unlawful, illegal, and immoral and none of the actions taken to create the independent, international city-state of Washington, DC, can bear examination.

The fact that this "independent, international city-state" exists is proof of actual insurrection against both our American Government and the British Territorial United States Government, too.

It's an international issue that must be dealt with, but it hardly deserves blood in the streets. It was done on paper and it can be erased on paper. The current members of Congress need to be pressed to do so or face arrest and charges of both Treason and Insurrection.

This is a separate, underlying elephant in the dining room, and there are plenty more to come.

Let's turn now to Mr. Trump's arrest and accusations of "insurrection" against this unauthorized independent, international city-state and its Municipal Government.

He has been arrested by members of this foreign Municipal Government, and unless he and his Legal Team wake up, he will be tried under their foreign Municipal Law, and he will be convicted under the presumption that he knowingly and voluntarily accepted their Municipal United States citizenship -- that is, Fourteenth Amendment citizenship.

Unfortunately for Mr. Trump's opponents, there is no viable "Fourteenth Amendment" to stand on, and therefore, no presumptive "citizenship of the United States" to use as the basis for prosecution against Trump or anyone else.

There is no way to put this politely: the "Constitution" published in 1868 as "The Constitution of the United States of America" was a Scottish con game. A sting.

The so-called "Corporate Constitution" was an attempt to enclose (a venal legal maneuver) the actual Territorial Constitution known as The Constitution of the United States of America, and convert it into a commercial "constitution" for a foreign corporation that was registered in Scotland in 1868, calling itself "The United States of America, Incorporated".

This corporate "constitution" adopted by and pertaining to this Scottish Corporation calling itself "The United States of America, Incorporated" is where the infamous "Fourteenth Amendment" was published -- as a By-Law "Amendment" never ratified by the States of the Union.

Nowhere else does this Amendment appear.

This same Scottish Corporation went bankrupt in 1907.

How much authority does a By-Law Amendment made to a foreign corporation's "constitution" have, more than a hundred years after that corporation went defunct?

All this continuing talk about the "Fourteenth Amendment" is droll, but ignorant.

The Corporation doesn't exist anymore and its so-called "constitution" never existed except as a private corporation's articles and by-laws.

Both this foreign Corporation and its Constitution are dead as door nails, and have been for more than a hundred years, so there is no basis for prosecuting anyone under its Fourteenth [unratified By-Law] Amendment.

Mr. Trump is no more subject to any such Fourteenth Amendment than the ducks in Slumberland Park -- and neither is anyone else.

It has been more than thirty years since we first brought this matter to the attention of Queen Elizabeth II, and her response was that it was "ancient history".

Which it is. We agreed on that part.

However, our objection is that this phony, unratified, corporate 14th Amendment, like the similar phony, unratified, corporate 16th By-Law Amendment is still being unlawfully, illegally, and immorally enforced on living people in this country more than a hundred years after it ceased to have any basis in reality.

The corporation is gone and so are its by-laws and its by-law amendments.

To the extent that such a Fourteenth Amendment ever existed, it is not and never was any legitimate part of the actual Territorial Constitution adopted in 1789 --- which would have required ratification by our States.

And the public records prove that no such 14th Amendment has ever been ratified by our States.

This is another egregious example of deliberate Municipal and Commercial Corporation fraud, based on self-interested misrepresentations, impersonations, deliberate confusion of similar documents and similar names, and as always, substitution schemes.

We call for the immediate dissolution of the independent, international city-state of Washington, DC, which leaves the City of Washington, DC, in its proper place as the intended and agreed upon Federal Capital.

We also call for the immediate exoneration and release of Donald Trump from any criminal charges of insurrection against this aforementioned illegally constructed government entity, and insist on a diplomatic level that all legal presumptions related to so-called Fourteenth Amendment citizenship obligations be permanently released from Donald Trump and all other Americans.

All this fraudulent nonsense being enforced by foreign Municipal and Commercial Corporations in their very own corporate tribunal "non-judicial" courts is a scandalous travesty that has to come to an end, along with all the oxymorons ("non-judicial courts" and "sovereign citizens") which have infested the English language because of this abject criminality and self-service on the part of these foreign corporations and their Principals.

We have foreclosed upon these Municipal and Commercial Corporations and their Principals and Parent Corporations for three reasons: (1) the insupportable nature and scope of their debts; (2) the abundant examples of bankruptcy fraud and substitution schemes these corporations have indulged in; (3) our disrespected service contracts and the damage this disrespect has caused, as in the current instance.

It is incumbent on every government and corporation, every institution of any kind, having contracts with our country, to take Notice and appropriate action to immediately and permanently correct their operations on our shores so as to bring them into compliance with our actual Constitutions and pay attention to which Amendments and what kind of Amendments applying to which documents, have been ratified by our States prior to bringing any charges against our people.

Specifically, there is no operable Fourteenth Amendment nor any subsequent such By-Law Amendments of defunct commercial corporations to rely upon for purposes of prosecution.

Cease and desist all and any prosecutions of Americans and all legal presumptions against them based on unratified corporate By-Law Amendments
espoused by defunct foreign corporations, or stand as pirates in the dock.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

10/18/2023

https://oneclickpolitics.global.ssl.fastly.net/messages/edit?promo_id=14048


Stop the ratification of the UN Arms Trade Treaty. This treaty would blatantly and severely infringe upon the Second Amendment and restrict our national sovereignty.

The right to self-defense is fundamental to a free society. The Founding Fathers recognized this, and this is why they included this right in the Bill of Rights.

The treaty would deny individuals the fundamental right to keep and bear arms, and its provisions would regulate all firearms, firearm components, and ammunition.

Furthermore, it requires countries to establish invasive firearm registries that allow the government to know exactly who owns a firearm and the model they own. To enforce the treaty, countries are allowed to engage in civilian disarmament, and the UN is allowed to assist countries in their disarmament schemes.

URGENT: The Biden administration is seeking to join and ratify the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty, which would severely infringe upon the Second Amendment. In March 2013, the Arms Trade Tre...

oneclickpolitics.global.ssl.fastly.net

Videos

The Federal Farmer lays out a laundry list of reasons why the system under the constitution “will have a strong tendency to aristocracy, or the government of the few.” Predicting it would ultimately result in a consolidated government ruling by “fear and force.”

Path to Liberty: February 19, 2024

The Federal Farmer lays out a laundry list of reasons why the system under the constitution “will have a strong tendency to aristocracy, or the government of the few.” Predicting it would ultimately result in a consolidated government ruling by “fear and force.”

Path to Liberty: February 19, 2024

In the first of his 18 anti-federalist letters, the Federal Farmer warned against adopting a new system hastily out of fear, which has always “been the custom of tyrants and their dependents.” Instead, he urged caution - and a deeper look at what might lead to total consolidation and a destruction of liberty.

Path to Liberty, Fast Friday Edition: February 9, 2024

People

Sorry, no results were found.

Circles

Sorry, no results were found.

Videos

The Federal Farmer lays out a laundry list of reasons why the system under the constitution “will have a strong tendency to aristocracy, or the government of the few.” Predicting it would ultimately result in a consolidated government ruling by “fear and force.”

Path to Liberty: February 19, 2024

The Federal Farmer lays out a laundry list of reasons why the system under the constitution “will have a strong tendency to aristocracy, or the government of the few.” Predicting it would ultimately result in a consolidated government ruling by “fear and force.”

Path to Liberty: February 19, 2024

In the first of his 18 anti-federalist letters, the Federal Farmer warned against adopting a new system hastily out of fear, which has always “been the custom of tyrants and their dependents.” Instead, he urged caution - and a deeper look at what might lead to total consolidation and a destruction of liberty.

Path to Liberty, Fast Friday Edition: February 9, 2024

One of George Mason’s leading objections to ratification was the structure of the federal judiciary. Thomas Jefferson signaled that he liked it at first, but in the years to follow, considered it the leading engine of consolidation, and the destruction of the constitution.

Path to Liberty: January 24, 2024

During the ratification debates, Federalists repeatedly warned that adding a bill of rights would be unnecessary - and even dangerous. Learn what they had to say - where they made good points - and missed the mark too.

Path to Liberty, Fast Friday Edition: December 15, 2023

Posts

Was the Constitution Sold on a Lie? Shays' Rebellion and Ratification

https://www.brighteon.com/dc7dbaf5-1c79-450a-b069-db02ad319ab4

Shays' Rebellion was repeatedly cited by Federalists as a primary reason to replace the Articles of Confederation with a Constitution with a stronger central government. But what if the threat was exaggerated? Anti-Federalists sure thought so. In this episode, we'll dive into the debate and explore James Madison's surprising later admission about this pivotal moment in American historyPath to Liberty, Fast Friday Edition: June 21, 2024

www.brighteon.com

01/07/2024

International Public Notice -- Insurrection by Usurpation
By Anna Von Reitz


Mr. Trump has been arrested and accused of various things, some of which could conceivably amount to insurrection --- but, insurrection against what?

The unlawfully and illegally constructed "independent international city-state" known as the Municipality of Washington, DC, is the purported object of this "insurrection", but this independent, international city-state has no solid right to exist, and even if it did, Mr. Trump would owe it no duty, except perhaps to protect it as a Possession of The United States.

This entity, the independent, international city-state of Washington, DC, sits in the middle of the District of Columbia as a foreign country plopped down in the middle of a foreign territory known as the District of Columbia, which is itself situated in the middle of our Eastern Seaboard on land actually owned by our States, Virginia and Maryland.

So we have two problem tenants, one of which was never intended to exist.

The independent international city-state was created by members of Congress who exercised their supposed "plenary" control over the Federal Capitol City, the City of Washington, DC, and turned it into their very own little foreign country -- the independent international city-state of Washington, DC, which, obviously, as a city-state, operates under its own Municipal Law.

This independent international city-state is exactly like Vatican City and the Inner City of London in its construction. It has its own flag. It claims to sit on its own ground and to have its own government. It also claims to have a service contract called The Constitution of the United States, which allows its personnel to be here under the terms of The Residence Act.

We don't agree with this interpretation of the circumstance, and we are in a position to know.

It's true that the Federal Constitution granted the members of Congress "plenary control" over the Federal Capitol (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17).

However -- which Federal Congress was this plenary power granted to?

It was granted to the American Federal Congress created in 1787.

---Not the British Territorial Congress created in 1789.

---Not the Papist Municipal Government Congress created in 1790.

The actual Federal Constitution adopted in 1787 granted the American Federal Congress plenary control over the Federal Capitol --- and that's not the same as the British Territorial Congress (created in 1789) or the Papist Municipal Congress (created in 1790) that messed around and decided to create an extra little country for itself.

Think about it.

Would our States give plenary control of our Federal Capitol to a foreign subcontractor? Or to their own American subcontractor?

Members of a different and unintended "Congress" exercised a delegated power never intended for it, and used this purloined delegated power to create a separate country -- a self-proclaimed "independent, international city-state" in our midst.

The men and women who did this were acting in insurrection and usurpation against our country in violation of their intended constitutional limitations -- and they knew it when they did it. Since then, these same criminals and miscreants have embarked on a world-spanning rampage of war-for-profit abroad, and ever-increasing criminality on our shores.

It was, and is, blatant treason and insurrection against the actual government of this country and the account holder that has been paying for all their "services".

Taking action against an illegally constructed foreign government -- an independent, international city-state run by members of Congress -- that is usurping against the actual government of this country and using purloined authority to do so, is the duty of the "President" of the United States of America, our British Territorial Subcontractor.

Not only is Mr. Trump right to take action against it, but every American has the same right and duty.

The people who should, under this circumstance, be tried for both treason and insurrection, are the members of the Congress who committed this gross overreach.

The then-Pope and the former Queen both had ample opportunity to contemplate this gross malfeasance of their operatives in this country and the extremely questionable standing of this foreign city-state, but they did not repent these errors.

Their attitude appeared to be, well, we got away with it, and until someone forces us back in our box, tough titties. Most Americans are too stupid to realize what we've done, so....

Still, a fraud is a fraud and an usurpation is an usurpation; exercise of purloined delegated power is unlawful, illegal, and immoral and none of the actions taken to create the independent, international city-state of Washington, DC, can bear examination.

The fact that this "independent, international city-state" exists is proof of actual insurrection against both our American Government and the British Territorial United States Government, too.

It's an international issue that must be dealt with, but it hardly deserves blood in the streets. It was done on paper and it can be erased on paper. The current members of Congress need to be pressed to do so or face arrest and charges of both Treason and Insurrection.

This is a separate, underlying elephant in the dining room, and there are plenty more to come.

Let's turn now to Mr. Trump's arrest and accusations of "insurrection" against this unauthorized independent, international city-state and its Municipal Government.

He has been arrested by members of this foreign Municipal Government, and unless he and his Legal Team wake up, he will be tried under their foreign Municipal Law, and he will be convicted under the presumption that he knowingly and voluntarily accepted their Municipal United States citizenship -- that is, Fourteenth Amendment citizenship.

Unfortunately for Mr. Trump's opponents, there is no viable "Fourteenth Amendment" to stand on, and therefore, no presumptive "citizenship of the United States" to use as the basis for prosecution against Trump or anyone else.

There is no way to put this politely: the "Constitution" published in 1868 as "The Constitution of the United States of America" was a Scottish con game. A sting.

The so-called "Corporate Constitution" was an attempt to enclose (a venal legal maneuver) the actual Territorial Constitution known as The Constitution of the United States of America, and convert it into a commercial "constitution" for a foreign corporation that was registered in Scotland in 1868, calling itself "The United States of America, Incorporated".

This corporate "constitution" adopted by and pertaining to this Scottish Corporation calling itself "The United States of America, Incorporated" is where the infamous "Fourteenth Amendment" was published -- as a By-Law "Amendment" never ratified by the States of the Union.

Nowhere else does this Amendment appear.

This same Scottish Corporation went bankrupt in 1907.

How much authority does a By-Law Amendment made to a foreign corporation's "constitution" have, more than a hundred years after that corporation went defunct?

All this continuing talk about the "Fourteenth Amendment" is droll, but ignorant.

The Corporation doesn't exist anymore and its so-called "constitution" never existed except as a private corporation's articles and by-laws.

Both this foreign Corporation and its Constitution are dead as door nails, and have been for more than a hundred years, so there is no basis for prosecuting anyone under its Fourteenth [unratified By-Law] Amendment.

Mr. Trump is no more subject to any such Fourteenth Amendment than the ducks in Slumberland Park -- and neither is anyone else.

It has been more than thirty years since we first brought this matter to the attention of Queen Elizabeth II, and her response was that it was "ancient history".

Which it is. We agreed on that part.

However, our objection is that this phony, unratified, corporate 14th Amendment, like the similar phony, unratified, corporate 16th By-Law Amendment is still being unlawfully, illegally, and immorally enforced on living people in this country more than a hundred years after it ceased to have any basis in reality.

The corporation is gone and so are its by-laws and its by-law amendments.

To the extent that such a Fourteenth Amendment ever existed, it is not and never was any legitimate part of the actual Territorial Constitution adopted in 1789 --- which would have required ratification by our States.

And the public records prove that no such 14th Amendment has ever been ratified by our States.

This is another egregious example of deliberate Municipal and Commercial Corporation fraud, based on self-interested misrepresentations, impersonations, deliberate confusion of similar documents and similar names, and as always, substitution schemes.

We call for the immediate dissolution of the independent, international city-state of Washington, DC, which leaves the City of Washington, DC, in its proper place as the intended and agreed upon Federal Capital.

We also call for the immediate exoneration and release of Donald Trump from any criminal charges of insurrection against this aforementioned illegally constructed government entity, and insist on a diplomatic level that all legal presumptions related to so-called Fourteenth Amendment citizenship obligations be permanently released from Donald Trump and all other Americans.

All this fraudulent nonsense being enforced by foreign Municipal and Commercial Corporations in their very own corporate tribunal "non-judicial" courts is a scandalous travesty that has to come to an end, along with all the oxymorons ("non-judicial courts" and "sovereign citizens") which have infested the English language because of this abject criminality and self-service on the part of these foreign corporations and their Principals.

We have foreclosed upon these Municipal and Commercial Corporations and their Principals and Parent Corporations for three reasons: (1) the insupportable nature and scope of their debts; (2) the abundant examples of bankruptcy fraud and substitution schemes these corporations have indulged in; (3) our disrespected service contracts and the damage this disrespect has caused, as in the current instance.

It is incumbent on every government and corporation, every institution of any kind, having contracts with our country, to take Notice and appropriate action to immediately and permanently correct their operations on our shores so as to bring them into compliance with our actual Constitutions and pay attention to which Amendments and what kind of Amendments applying to which documents, have been ratified by our States prior to bringing any charges against our people.

Specifically, there is no operable Fourteenth Amendment nor any subsequent such By-Law Amendments of defunct commercial corporations to rely upon for purposes of prosecution.

Cease and desist all and any prosecutions of Americans and all legal presumptions against them based on unratified corporate By-Law Amendments
espoused by defunct foreign corporations, or stand as pirates in the dock.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

10/18/2023

https://oneclickpolitics.global.ssl.fastly.net/messages/edit?promo_id=14048


Stop the ratification of the UN Arms Trade Treaty. This treaty would blatantly and severely infringe upon the Second Amendment and restrict our national sovereignty.

The right to self-defense is fundamental to a free society. The Founding Fathers recognized this, and this is why they included this right in the Bill of Rights.

The treaty would deny individuals the fundamental right to keep and bear arms, and its provisions would regulate all firearms, firearm components, and ammunition.

Furthermore, it requires countries to establish invasive firearm registries that allow the government to know exactly who owns a firearm and the model they own. To enforce the treaty, countries are allowed to engage in civilian disarmament, and the UN is allowed to assist countries in their disarmament schemes.

URGENT: The Biden administration is seeking to join and ratify the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty, which would severely infringe upon the Second Amendment. In March 2013, the Arms Trade Tre...

oneclickpolitics.global.ssl.fastly.net

08/07/2023

THIS IS BIG!!!



International Common Law Commercial Claim Notice: A Proper Reading:
By Anna Von Reitz


It used to be the custom that apprentice lawyers “read the law” as preparation for their chosen profession under the guidance of an established practitioner. Law was a trade established under the Guild system in Europe, not a profession, and every lawyer served as an apprentice. I am a rare and belated product of that system of tutelage, which, though uncommon in the modern day, has never failed to have its charms and advantages.

I was greatly favored by fortune to study under two great men who were very accomplished Masters, who between them, had practiced American Common Law, British Equity Law, Maritime Law, Admiralty Law, Martial Law, Ecclesiastical and Canon Law, during their long and illustrious careers. So, while I am not and will never be a member of the Bar Association, I am well-educated and competent to render that rare thing: a proper reading of the law and history written as law.

It will come as a surprise to many that some forms of history are written as law and use legals terms that an average person will be unaware of, so that the truth is hidden in plain sight--- easily accessible to lawyers, but conveniently hidden from the General Public. With the advantage of having a competent and willing interpreter at your side, let’s examine some key events in American History that were preserved by lawyers and written down in historical legalese:

Quote and Fact: “Seven southern nation States of America walked out of the Second Session of the Thirty-sixth Congress on March 27, 1861.”

Because it says, “States of America” and not “States”, we know that the entities represented were States-of-States, also known as Confederate States, that were members of the original Confederation formed by The Articles of Confederation in 1781, and we already know from other readings that this Confederation was the American Subcontractor awarded the Service Contract known as The Constitution for the united States of America in 1787.

Also, because the odd construction “nation States” is used instead of “nation states” or “Nation States” we know that the entities operating these “Confederate States” were sovereign nations. In this case, the Union states were the sovereign nations operating the member organizations of the Confederation. For example, Florida was operating The State of Florida, and The State of Florida was a member of the original Confederation.

All this additional information is instantly available to one who is trained to read the law and who can then also read history written as law.

The Congress which adjourned Sine Die – meaning without a date to meet again, had to be the Congress of the States of America Confederation and not the Congress of the United States, nor the Congress of the United States of America.

Why does this matter? Because…. There were three (3) original Federal Subcontractors, one American, one British, and one Holy Roman Empire organization, and we are now discussing how the lead Subcontractor in possession of the key contract, the original Federal Constitution issued in 1787, committed suicide. They just walked out and left the door wide open.

On April 15, 1861, two weeks later, President Lincoln convened (a) Congress under the Executive branch by proclamation (Number 1): “I do hereby, in virtue of the power in me vested by the Constitution, convene both Houses of Congress.”

He doesn’t say which Constitution or which Congress he is convening, but we know….

It cannot be the adjourned Congress of the States of America because Lincoln was not an officer, much less an Executive Officer of the States of America. He was literally prohibited from serving in any such capacity, because he was a Bar Attorney and The Constitution of the united States of America had been amended in 1819 by the ratification of the Titles of Nobility Amendment, sometimes known as the “missing” or “original” 13th Amendment, so that no Bar Member could hold an office in the American Confederation doing business as the States of America operating under The Constitution for the united States of America.

No, the only Congress that Lincoln could convene was the Congress of the United States of America, Incorporated, the British Crown Corporation Subcontractor operating under The Constitution of the United States of America ---- and he would have to do that under Executive Power as the “President” of this foreign British Territorial Municipal Corporation.

See the Switch? Let’s make this very explicit and plain:

The Congress of the States of America Confederation, which was running the Federal Republic under The Constitution for the united States of America, adjourned, and didn’t come back into Session.

This left a vacuum of power and an opportunity to usurp.

Lincoln called another, different Congress, the “Congress” of the British Territorial United States of America, Incorporated, into Session.

He could convene that “Congress” because he was President of that Corporation.

So, Lincoln pulled a deft substitution fraud on the people of this country and replaced the Congress of the American Federal Subcontractor with the Congress of the British Territorial Subcontractor, instead.

Our American Federal Government thus came under the control of a British Crown Corporation headed by Abraham Lincoln, a Bar Attorney holding allegiance to the then-Queen Victoria.

Lincoln, by pulling this sleight of hand and appearing to convene the “missing” Congress, while in fact convening a different Congress entirely, proved to be one of the greatest con artists in history.

Americans are still confused by this little parlor trick and virtually all assume that the American Congress operated in what they call “de jure” capacity prior to this, and then operated in what they call “de facto” capacity ever since --- but no, that’s not what happened.

There were two (2) completely different Federal Subcontractors involved before and after these events: the original American Confederation of States operating as the States of America, was literally replaced by the British Crown Subcontractor operating as the United States of America, Incorporated.

The mechanism was simple. The Confederation stopped functioning, so the British Territorial corporation moved in and started functioning in a capacity never intended for it.

Lincoln repeatedly abused his position of trust.

Lincoln wasn’t eligible to serve as President of the Confederation because the Titles of Nobility Amendment (TONA) had been ratified by the States in 1819, prohibiting Bar Attorneys from holding public offices in our American government. As a result, Lincoln had no Public Office in our government, but he was free as a bird to serve as “President” of a privately owned and operated foreign corporation, the United States of America, Incorporated.

Lincoln, a Bar Attorney, deceptively occupied the office of President of the United States of America, Incorporated, a British Crown Corporation, and passed that foreign private corporation “presidency” off as the Public Office intended by, and owed to, the people of this country when they voted in the General Election of 1860.

Lincoln and his supporters knew this and continued with the deception anyway. They operated under a “cloak of secrecy” then and their successors have continued to operate under a cloak of secrecy ever since. It was in this way that the Federal Republic owing allegiance to the American People was set aside and a substitute organization, a privately owned and operated British Crown Corporation, was stood up in its place.

Having already betrayed the Public Trust by misrepresenting the nature of his “presidency”, Lincoln next usurped upon the American Federal Subcontractor, and put his own British Crown Corporation in the driver’s seat under his own Executive Power.

Lincoln was occupying no American Public Office when he did this, nor at any other time during his “presidency”.

His Administration and everything associated with it was a fraud in the nature of a Half-Truth.

The United States of America, Incorporated, was a Federal Subcontractor operating under The Constitution of the United States of America, and Abraham Lincoln was its President. That much was true, and that did afford him an ability to legitimately exercise some limited and enumerated delegated powers.

However, that constitutional contract did not afford Lincoln or any other British Crown Corporation "President" the sweeping powers he assumed on April 15th, 1861.

Finally confronting the abject criminality of “Honest Abe” and his cohorts, we can now better understand the terrible consequences of the Mercenary Conflict, disguised as a Civil War, which followed.

Let us notice that:

(1) Our American Federal Republic was undermined by infighting among the State-of-State organizations that were members of the original Confederation established in 1781. If they had simply stood together and exposed Lincoln's charade, the so-called Civil War and the usurpation of our American Government by British Commercial Interests, would never have happened;

(2) The Confederation in possession of The Constitution for the united States of America was vacated by its own members, never dissolved nor overcome by any act of war. The re-establishment of the Federal Republic only requires each State of the Union to reconstruct its own State-of-State organization and send delegates charged with the responsibility of running the Federal Republic to Washington, DC.

(3) Nothing that Lincoln did was credible. It was all in the nature of a deliberate fraud scheme based on half-truths and semantic deceits based on similar names and substitutions of Public Offices for private offices. As this entire history was begun in fraud, it ends as fraud and is null and void as if it never was.

(4) The cloak of secrecy about all of this was provided by members of the Bar Associations preying upon the ignorance of the General Public and the inability of the General Public to read law and history written in the form of law. For one population, the lawyers among us, the entire circumstance is plain as day and always has been. They failed their Public Duty as Americans to reveal this dire usurpation, for the simple reason that virtually all of them are Bar Association members, and as Bar Association members, they owe allegiance to the British Crown. It was this conflict of interest which motivated the Americans to enact the Titles of Nobility Amendment and to attach it to The Constitution for the united States of America in the first place.

I am not a Bar Member. I have dishonored no contract, broken no Oath, and disavowed no allegiance by telling you what all this means in plain English.

(5) As Lincoln occupied no Public Office in the American Government, his actions including his Administration of the entire so-called Civil War can have no valid impact upon us, and results in no indebtedness for us, unless we count actions such as the final surrender of the CSS Shenandoah, taking place on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways, that would have naturally fallen under the delegated powers that were assigned by The Constitution of the United States of America.

(6) All the debts and all the usurpations that we and our Government have suffered at the hands of these British Con Artists are due and owing redress from the British Monarch and the Lord Mayor of the Inner City of London. Lincoln and his Successors have been under contract to render Americans good faith service the entire time, and by both word and deed, they have defaulted and dishonored their obligations and defrauded us. They have organized an unauthorized foreign military district court system on our land and soil and used this to practice personage against their faithful employers, turning what should be an institution of justice into a den of thieves intent on illegal confiscation of American property for 158 years.

(7) The long dormant American Government has awakened and our States of the Union are now in General Assembly throughout the country. The British Government and Crown are making a feeble attempt to pull yet another substitution fraud, by offering to send their Operatives into our Assemblies to disrupt our progress and to occupy our Federal Republic "for" us --- offers which we have firmly refused.

(8) Owing to the many decades that these British Commercial Interests have been enabled to act under color of law while carrying out their despicable acts of terror and despotism "in our names", they have accrued an insurmountable debt to the American People, and so these Corporations and their franchises stand foreclosed. We require the assistance of all right-thinking people, all peacekeepers, all valid law enforcement agencies, and all allied and friendly sovereign governments to recoup control of our Good Names, our physical assets, and credit.

(9) The banks of the world also bear responsibility for the inculcation and preservation of the Cloak of Secrecy protecting this Great Fraud against the American People and many other sovereign nations and peoples. The Bank of England is especially implicated, together with the various iterations of Federal Reserve Banks, the Swiss Octagon Group, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, together with their associated Insurers and Underwriters. This immense fraud against the lawful governments and living people could never have happened without the willing assistance of the banks as accomplices to the Crimes of State involved.

(10) On April 25th 1863 Abraham Lincoln bankrupted his British Crown Corporation operating as the United States of America, Incorporated.

Five years later, 1868, another British Crown Corporation organized in Scotland and doing-business-as The United States of America (Incorporated) booted up, and the banks allowed this foreign impersonator to access the credit owed to our unincorporated Federation of States, The United States of America.

They instituted the Greenbacks Scheme, by which they created a new investment instrument, a Treasury Bond payable in either 10 year or 40 year version, but in order for investors to buy this particular investment, they had to first exchange their gold for Lincoln's Greenbacks and then pay for the Treasury Bonds in Greenbacks. The investors understood that they would be repaid after 10 or 40 years with gold plus interest, however, when the Treasury Bonds came due, General William "Tecumseh" Sherman refused to pay in gold, saying, famously, --- "What did you use to buy these bonds? Greenbacks. So why would you demand repayment in gold?

Thus millions of mostly American investors were defrauded out of their gold and suckered into investing in Greenbacks instead of the gold-backed investment bonds they imagined were on offer. The gold-backed Treasury Bonds (unknowingly backed by the defrauded private investors themselves) were nonetheless due. By 1906 this goose was nicely cooked and "The United States of America" Incorporated in Scotland was forced into bankruptcy -- with the result that the American people were again forced to pay the bill for these criminals.

(11) On Christmas Eve, 1913, as that bankruptcy was settling, the Successors to that Corporation operating as, again, the United States of America, Inc., engineered the installation of a fiat money scheme based on the issuance of our credit against us and against our best interests; they also misappropriated the seigniorage owed to ourselves as the actual Underwriters. This action resulted in labor being used as the asset underlying the currency and a system of debt slavery being imposed on this country by and through Principals owing us good faith service.

(12) On March 6th 1933, Franklin Delano Roosevelt announced to the Conference of British Territorial Governors, that "the United States of America (Incorporated) is bankrupt!" --- and the cost of that bankruptcy would again be passed off onto the American populace as the presumed Underwriters and Guarantors of all the spending that these British Crown usurpers were doing "for" us and in our names, as preparation for their latest war-for-profit scheme-- the Second World War.

In concert with this, the same Crown Corporation interests were obliged to issue and publish a fixed exchange rate by which they proposed to exchange one of their I.O.U.s predicated on labor performance in the future for one American Silver Dollar. In this way they received the bulk of our silver currency in inequitable exchange for their promised future performances and acquired an exchangeable debt amounting to trillions of ounces of fine silver, payable on demand. They simply never thought that someone with standing to make the demand would make it, but here I am.

(13) Following the Second World War the Bretton Woods debt-credit system scheme was adopted despite the fact that its success depended on a constantly expanding economy --- which is an impossibility. The fiat Federal Reserve Note was made the world Reserve Currency at the cost of becoming the Universal Debtor, accepting all corporation debts worldwide. The Bretton Woods Agreement predictably failed, with the result that this country was taken off both the silver and gold standard and the fiat "Dollar" was backed by refined petroleum instead.

At each juncture all these deals are being made "for" us and purportedly with our permission via acquiescence, by the Successors to the original British Crown Corporation that Lincoln used as a substitute for the Federal Republic all those years before. But there was never any excuse for the banks to allow these pikers access to our credit and no full disclosure ever given to the General Public; and although it is well-known throughout the world that the people of this country are it's government and the contents of our Constitutions are widely published worldwide, the banks and the attorneys responsible shook their heads and wondered where the American Government went?

As recently as 2018, Karen Hudes, a former Employee of the World Bank was claiming that our government was "in interregnum" and "Absent" --- whereabouts unknown.

The Confederation was never Reconstructed and the Perpetrators conveniently forgot to tell the still-standing Federation and its Officers that they were "Absent", too, while murdering them and burning down their homes and making false allegations against them and forcing them to flee to the wilds of the Pacific Northwestern United States in fear for their lives.

This is how these traitors and criminals treated their Employers and those entrusted with the actual government of this country.

They stared every day at the people they were pillaging, plundering, and defrauding in bad faith, and pretended not to see them. They made us pay to use our own credit. They purloined and leveraged and issued foreign titles as land descriptions as a mechanism to gain an interest in our property by copyright -- and then issued mortgages against our property in our own names as consideration for our use of their vacuous copyrights.

And all the while they pretended that we were doing this evil to ourselves and willingly, voluntarily accepting the burdens they were heaping on us, thinking that nobody would ever figure it all out, and even if we did, we would be so poor and miserable and powerless, we wouldn't be able to drag them on the carpet for it.

This is a commercial affidavit; not a Point of Law.

By these actions they have rendered themselves insolvent and owing all their debts without benefit of bankruptcy to this country and nation, all the way back to April 15th 1861, plus reasonable and customary interest.

Additionally, these same British Crown Perpetrators have recently caused a worldwide disaster via another mode of war profiteering executed by Uniformed Officers, aka, licensed Medical Doctors and Registered Nurses, by which they have used biowarfare to commit genocide.

At the same time they have made a False and Outlawed Claim in Commerce by introducing harmful scraps of their own patented and artificially engineered mRNA to the human genome and using that undisclosed ruse as the basis to claim literal ownership of the recipients of their "vaccine" as Genetically Modified Organisms. Their claim was pre-denied and outlawed by our government and the government of each sovereign State of the Union and a fee schedule of $1 Trillion United States Silver Dollars, also payable in gold, per American killed, maimed, or disabled was published globally.

This has accrued, at our latest best estimate, a debt of 687,000,000,000,000.00 due and payable by all the corporations and Principals involved.

I hereby declare them all insolvent and forfeit for cause.

I am fourth generation Wisconsinite born and bred on the land of Wisconsin, one of the sovereign and independent states of the Union, inextricably part of its soil and heritage, extracted and immune from any presumption or mischaracterization or impersonation resulting from undisclosed and unconscionable Third Party registrations or any other False Claim issued against me, my ancestors, or my progeny by the United States of America, Incorporated, in 1861, or by any of its Successors at any time since.

Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary

The United States of America

In care of: Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska 99652

August 7th 2023

07/17/2023

Reply to Ron Vrooman --- Again, and Everyone Being Misled by Him
By Anna Von Reitz


You have it completely backwards and have always had it completely backwards.

In 1787, as we know from period Dictionaries, the word "Federal" meant "Contract".

The Federal Government is and has always been composed of Governmental Services Subcontractors.

The American Subcontractor was popularly known as the "Federal Republic".

It was run by the Confederation of States doing business as the States of America.

This is confirmed by the records and by the construction of the name and title of "The Constitution for the united States of America" ratified in 1787. See? The organization receiving the contract was "States of America".

This is the "Organic" Federal Constitution which created, empowered --- and at the same time, limited, the new American Federal Subcontractor.

All this history has been explained to you multiple times, the documents have either been provided or you have been given the proper citations.

So who or what "subcontracted" with all these service providers, both American and foreign?

It was not as you say and mislead people to believe "federal citizens" making these contracts. They would be contracting with themselves according to your "theory".

Remember that the "federal citizenry" didn't exist prior to the Constitutions. That's why they are always focused on the constitution, the constitution, the constitution to the point of ignoring all else --- because without their particular Constitution, they have no jobs and no viable political identity.

We are not in that boat. With or without any federal Constitution or Subcontractors at all, our Federation of States and our States continue to exist.

Which is another bone to pick with you.

The phrase "We, the People" has meaning in both Law and Grammar. The people live in our nation-states of the Union, while the People function as Lawful Persons in international venues.

The people are those we refer to as State Nationals or the General Public, those who have no particular obligation to serve the government at any level.

The People refers to State Citizens, who owe no obligation, but who freely renounce any allegiance to any other government and serve as International Fiduciary Deputies for their State of the Union.

We know this from the history, from the way international business was conducted among nations in the 1700s, and from the grammar. These State Citizens serving as Fiduciary Deputies of the actual States are the "People" in "We, the People", who contracted with the three Federal Subcontractors on behalf of their States.

Only State Citizens can enforce the Constitutions because State Citizens are the only ones who created and ratified the Constitutions. They and their Successors are the only Parties to the Constitutions from the American side of the contract

The Union being referred to at the time and place, during the ratification of the Constitutions, is the original Union formed by the nation-states in 1776, and is not to be confused with the "Union" that fought in the Civil War.

You are completely mistaken if you actually believe that "no Federal Constitution exists" simply because various hirelings dropped the ball, stopped providing services, were not retained, and so on.

At the level of the Principals who created these contracts, they are still very much in play --- and it doesn't matter how many times the US INC. or the US CORP or the UNITED STATES or the USA, Inc. or the United States of America, Incorporated, or The United States of America, Incorporated, goes bankrupt or out of business.

And as for Oaths of Office, the Informer researched that 30 plus years ago and nothing has changed.

Out of thousands of "oaths" and offices examined, exactly four people had oaths that met the requirements for a valid Oath of Public Office. This means that these people who are seeming to occupy these Public Offices are not actually seated in those Offices. They are appearing to be Governors and Sheriffs and so on, and they are exercising the powers, but in actual fact, they have never accepted the liability attached to the job.

This is just a small part of what has to be addressed, but if people like you continue to ignore, misinterpret, and mislead people who are already confused enough, that effort to clean this mess up just gets harder to do.

Cease and desist. The Oregon Assembly was duly called into Session in 2019. You are eligible to join it, but not supplant it.

----------------------------

See this article and over 4200 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com