Kari Lake Files 74-Page Lawsuit Against Katie Hobbs, Election Officials
KARI LAKE FILES 74-PAGE LAWSUIT AGAINST KATIE HOBBS, ELECTION OFFICIALS
Steven Ahle
September 17, 2023
Kari Lake's Appeal Hearing Is Set For Thursday.
Kari lake has finally been able to file her appeal of the 2022 election that was stolen from her. the filing contains 74 pages and has even more evidence than her original suit.
She also won’t have the disadvantage of the case being heard by a corrupt judge like she faced in her original trial. The judge hearing the appeal is Yavapai County Superior Court Judge John Napper who refused Maricopa County’s motion to dismiss the case.
Judge Napper said that there is nothing wrong with comparing the signatur4es on mail-in ballots with the signature on their registration.
This is a key point because there have been many issues found with the signatures, including mismatched signatures, multiple votes in the same handwriting, the name on the ballot not matching the name on the registration, and other problems.
Lake and her attorneys are most likely going to get to see all of the mail-in ballot envelopes, which is the key to Lake’s victory.
Lake’s opening brief in the case says there is new evidence to support her allegations:
“New evidence demonstrates that Maricopa falsely certified its 446 vote-center tabulators passed mandatory L&A certification testing prior to Election Day and strongly suggests Maricopa planned the Election Day debacle.”
The filing said:
“The ensuing chaos led to massive lines and wait times, thereby impairing or depriving the right to vote of tens of thousands of predominately Republican voters.”
“Arizona elections are now in uncharted territory.”
“New evidence produced by Maricopa County (“Maricopa”) strongly suggests that Maricopa officials intentionally sabotaged the 2022 General Election, then gave false testimony attempting to cover up their misconduct. Even viewed in the light most favorable to Maricopa, the evidence shows Maricopa intentionally failed to conduct logic and accuracy (‘L&A’) testing” required by law and “altered the election equipment thereby rendering the election irredeemably flawed.“