https://newcastlehelix.com/events/2021/11/16/jacobson-lecture-leading-the-fight-against-virus-spread-the-integrated-covid

to Public lectures admin Newcastle University
There is multiple flawed assumption rather than science as to what caused 59,259 deaths in March 2020 that did not follow a Gompertz disease curve and indicative of a mass poisoning event OR Deaths BY Lockdown-missed hospital appointments.
A lecture predicated on the assumption as a virus when other evidence suggest as mass poisoning event, or Deaths BY Lockdown Meddling.
My chart suggests what should be being considered in any relevant lecture other than a one story narrative about a supposed virus.
Indeed it may be a virus but certainly not SARS-Cov2 as none existent composite RNA library sequences.
Chart1

My chart does not include the latest US patent identification of the use of Docetaxel Chemotherapy Immune suppression in one of the nano lipid or the use of Tromethamine in the Jab for age 12-16 to stop the surge in myocarditis pulmonary thrombosis, Cytokine storm and capillary blood clots in most critical organs.
To then have a Cure that does not work and to then cause more of the same symptoms as Cytokine storms and blood clots. What cure kills rather than saves.

Did a Flu2019 vaccine containing Graphene oxide to cause the March2020 disease?
Does a lecture proposing “leading the fight against virus spread address fundamental question

The toxicity of Graphene oxide increases on the exposure of EMF radiation.
Does the correlation of 5G roll out and the new disease March2020s indicate an EMF increase in toxicity of Graphene oxide (resonant frequencies) explain 59,259 death above a 5 year average 2015-2019. ONS data my Chart1.
There is a direct correlation between vaccine roll out jan2021 and 33,016 deaths in Jan2021
A current 37,088 deaths above a five year average since July2021 as indicative of Deaths BY Booster as repeated Graphene Oxide poisoning to result in Cytokine storm and the symptoms as for Graphene oxide poisoning
If those Hypotheses observations become reality then how can anyone take the position that they are “leading the fight against virus spread”.
Where is the consideration of all Hypotheses in real science. Has this proposed lecture replaced science with assumption.
Some would argue pseudo-science assumptions are based on BigPharma finance of medical research. Newcastle University?

What evidence is there to have a lecture predicated on leading the fight against the virus spread if it is not a virus?
If it were a virus then does anyone actually know what that virus RNA sequence is.
How can “Virus spread” be defined by a definition of cases as that is meaningless pseudo-science based on a PCR test that never used any identified offending RNA sequence, compounded by Cycle thresholds at x45, to 35X CT when x15 still guarantees an almost 100% positive.
“Spread of a virus” using a Case predicated on a PCR test that can find anything using the right primers. Zhu China assumed from 22 pathogens it was a Coronavirus and used those primers, while never isolated or identified as linked to any offending RNA sequence.
In effect science where the Results outcome is controlled by the method. A result “primed” to happen. An experiment where the cart comes before the horse.
To then use those flawed cases, using Flawed PCR, lateral flow RNA sequence as the evidence to Shut down the country to stop the supposed spread that then caused Deaths BY Meddling-Lockdown-missed hospital appointments.
That is more fiction than reality as underpinned by flawed science and assumption.
e.g. Where is the correlation between supposed cases and Deaths since June2021

What kind a science that uses supposed cases to have misled the public as a pandemic, shuts down the country that is not killing anyone
Chart2
A Government entirely reliant on supposed “cases” but does not see the “elephant in the room of few deaths, especially a perspective where there are 73,980 respiratory deaths every year 5 year average.
Chart3
A UK Government that can ignore 73,980 respiratory deaths every year, yet shut the country down on 59,259 deaths for an unknown disease that reached herd immunity by June2020.
The rest as Deaths BY Meddling to then discuss “leading the fight against Virus spread” as if that was the only hypothesis.

If the root cause (invented RNA sequence in a PCR x45CT 100% positive, Corman-Drosten fiasco https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/ was flawed then everything thereafter is flawed.
I list below my efforts to try and find in any of the so-called RNA sequence Validation research papers Zhu, CDC WHO that supposedly identified the offending RNA as SARS-Cov2 but reports that actually never did validate.
So a lecture on “leading the fight against the Spread of the virus” becomes meaningless pseudo-science. What Virus? What Spread?

All of which ignores the surge in Myocarditis associated symptoms with possible mass poisoning event in the new disease March2020 and also the Gene Therapy and Boosters mostly as capillary blood clot damage everywhere.
If there is a “Virus“ spread its Myocarditis, and Cytokine storms none of which may have anything to do with a virus and everything to do with a Mass poisoning event.

Chart4 Why a significant increase in Echo Cardiology that doubled 2020-2021 Cytokine Storm poisoning events-capillary damage everywhere?
Apart from lethal Graphene oxide nano lipid delivery system there are U.S. Moderna Patents for Docetaxel nano lipid to inhibit the immune system presumably to allow the Spike 2 proliferation. There is no research that the immune system can turn itself back on.
Docetaxel as a Breast cancer Chemotherapy drug used to turn off the immune system. The question is does that mean turned off for good especially after multiple booster shots as an immune deficient society extinction event?

An add the possibility of an Infertility extinction event due to high concentrations in critical organs.
A Graphene oxide cytotoxicity that causes cell viability reduced to 80% at concentrations of 10µg/ml while a Gene Therapy injection is 1µg/ml as 98% Graphene Oxide active ingredients to then appear in concentrations of 12µg/ml in the ovaries.
Chart5
Yet the one story narrative ignores all that for a viral infection that spreads and ignores even the Pfizer report as to possible biodistribution health impact

Where in the lecture will it address the above hypotheses issues with its own unscientific assertion that it is a virus.
A supposed successful Gene therapy that requires multiple boosters as indicative of efficacy failure, and amendments to U.S. patents to mitigate Myocarditis in the inoculated age 12-17.
A supposed successful Gene therapy that relentlessly has suppressed labelling as Deaths BY Vaccine to be relabelled as Deaths WITH Covid. A pseudo-science that is uncapable of honest data and prefers manipulation. Science then becomes propaganda.
Many vaccine programs have been immediately stopped after 21 days have died, again relabelled as Deaths WITH Covid None are allowed to consider Deaths BY Vaccine.
Table 6
No doubt from the 229,981 there were comorbidities, however many deaths relabelled as Deaths WITH Covid predicated on a flawed PCR-lateral flow composite RNA sequence X35-x45CT magnification as meaningless pseudo-science but it does make the Deaths BY Gene therapy disappear as with all those scientists that do not agree with the one story narrative; sacked Care worker, and NHS staff in April. Doctors removed from Social media yet a lecture on Fighting against the virus spread as OK.
Let us have a lecture on the demise of the NHS due to staff shortages by April or is that privatisation by the backdoor?

So what validity is there in the claim in “Leading the fight against Virus spread that is predicated on meaningless “Cases”?
So what validity is there in the claim in “Leading the fight against Virus spread if it is a mass poisoning event?
So what validity is there in the claim in “Leading the fight against Virus spread when the Vaxxed now realise multiple boosters required as the Vaccine does not stop infection or stops infecting others.

Science is about considering all hypotheses, What science is there, if a lecture starts from the premise that Viruses exist and all other hypotheses is heresy.
Pasteur Germ theory-Béchamp Terrain theory, Exosomes to clean out the poisons, or Exosome as one and the same as a Virus depending on circumstances, or a virus trojan horse high-jacking an Exosome. Hildreth John Hopkins. Now that is real science.
The new disease may indeed be a virus but where is the proof. The only evidence is flawed by Zhu China at failed to isolate, identify or link the disease to the specific offending RNA sequence and also subsequent CDC flawed extraction.
My fully detailed and evidenced evaluation below of those validation reports from Zhu China and CDC.

What evidence is being used to “fight against virus spread” if there is no virus.
What evidence is being used to “fight against virus spread” if there is no evidence that the test used to define “cases” using the PCR test as totally flawed including the Corman Drosten fiasco that uses a library SARS2003 RNA sequence. There is no real SARS-Cov2.
A SARS-Cov2 composite RNA sequence invention that actually does not exist as a virus, or any Koch-Rivers postulate evidence anywhere in those reports.

How can anyone be “leading the fight” against virus spread if the virus was a mass poisoning event based on Graphene Oxide?
Why is there no one “leading the fight” against a mass poisoning event?
How can a Docetaxel Chemotherapy in a Covid Jab stop the virus spread. Surely a chemotherapy designed to inhibit the immune system opens the doors to greater infections if not an extinction event.

What is “the integrated Covid North east Hub” that ignores all alternative views other than the one story narrative of the Chemical industry , and ignores all the alternative analysis?
What cutting edge science threatens all medical researchers with instant dismissal and personal denigration if they disagree with the enforced hypotheses of Covid the Virus.?
Is this Lecture deliberate re-education to cancel all debate? To ignore all debate to make it go away. Head in the Sand science?
Has the Integrate Hub North east considered any other reason for excessive deaths in 2020-2021 other than a virus.
Has Lockdowns missed hospital appointments, toxic agents in the vaccine been the actual cause of supposed virus spread?
What is scientific in a supposed Covid-19 case where no symptoms are labelled a case, where that case uses a PCR test run at 35 to45 cycle threshold based on an RNA sequence that is not identified as causing the disease.
What kind of science is going on at the Integrate Hub North east?

So a list of questions for a lecture compromised by its inability to consider all Hypotheses and as only the one story narrative allowed. That is not science.
Viruses may not exist. What we consider a virus may indeed by an out of control redirected exosome, and more about poisons, and our immune system than anything to do with virus spread.
So how can that be a fight against virus spread if the real science may well be an integrated exosome, quasi-virus or simply poisoning.
Graphene Oxide Mass poisoning may have been the cause, yet a lecture that ignores the alternative hypotheses to suggest and assume; Leading the fight against virus spread: the Integrated Covid Hub North East.

Which question should I put to this lecture?
Maybe the question should be; “Why has this lecture ignored all other evidenced hypotheses?