🚀 FOX NEWS Unleashes Classified Revelations 🚀

Hold on tight as we embark on an eye-opening journey into the shocking revelations recently dropped by FOX NEWS. Brace yourselves; the truth is far stranger than fiction.

🔎 The Whistleblower's Explosive Allegation 🔎

First, we delve into an explosive revelation. A CIA whistleblower has stepped into the limelight, revealing to Congress that the agency offered a jaw-dropping incentive to officials investigating the origins of COVID-19. Their mission? To alter their stance, shifting from the belief that the virus originated from a Wuhan lab leak to a perplexing "unable to determine" verdict. The liberal community was rocked by this revelation, setting off a chain reaction of investigations into the virus's creation, Fauci's ties to the CIA, and the creation of COVID itself.

💨 The Chemtrail Controversy Unearthed 💨

But wait, there's more. FOX NEWS took aim at the skies, uncovering a startling story out of Missouri. This bombshell report exposed alleged (CIA) U.S. military operations that involved spraying predominantly black communities with cancer-causing agents from airplanes via chemtrails. As if that weren't enough, they detailed the intentional installation of exhaust systems on buildings, releasing radioactive isotopes and harmful chemicals into impoverished communities.

🔍 The Congressional Unearthing Begins 🔍

Now, the real digging commences. Congress has rolled up its sleeves, delving deep into state records and archives, unearthing evidence of the CIA's covert cancer-causing chemtrail operations spanning decades. Shockingly, the trail of this depopulation agenda leads back to the Rockefellers, a family deeply enmeshed with other elite dynasties, steering the vaccine networks and global medical industry. This web of power birthed figures like Fauci, set the CIA in motion, and handed over the reins to the likes of George W. H. Bush and George W. Bush, architects of bioweapons projects, including the infamous gain-of-function research.

🌐 A Worldwide Disclosure Unfolds 🌐

Behind the scenes, the Military Alliance has ensured that both CNN and FOX NEWS continue to drop these red pill revelations, awakening liberals and the unwittingly compliant. Classified information is infiltrating civilian sectors, with leaks hitting the internet and select mainstream media outlets. This global dissemination ensures that declas drops resonate across languages and borders.

🌍 The Plan for a Global Awakening 🌍

A global resistance revolution is underway, spurred by the impending failure of Plandemic II and the world's rising opposition to the globalist elite's agenda. The Military Alliance is orchestrating this worldwide resistance to the deep state cabal's sinister operations.

🎥 Tucker Carlson's Strategic Move 🎥

Even Rupert Murdoch, the owner of FOX NEWS and a CIA asset, couldn't censor the two monumental reports. Recognizing the power of Twitter, the Military Alliance orchestrated Tucker Carlson's move from FOX to Twitter to ensure maximum impact.

🚀 Hold On, The Truth Unfolds 🚀

Buckle up, dear readers, for we are witnessing an unprecedented unveiling of classified information and truths long buried. Stay vigilant as the stage is set for further revelations that will shake the foundations of our understanding.


Subscribe:
https://t.me/ConspiracyCabal

HEY IF THOSE STUPID TEXANS WANT TO VOTE FOR SATAN BLUE, THEY DESERVE ALL THE PROBLEMS WITH ILLEGALS THEY CAN GET,,SHOULDNT BE CLOSE, IT SHOULD BE ALL RED,,,,RED IS FREEDOMS.
We are at a critical juncture in the battle for TX-34. Our recent polling data from May 24-26 shows Republican Mayra Flores and Democrat Vicente González are tied at 42% each!

But here’s the reality: we are being significantly outspent in key areas of this race.
If we continue to be outspent, we risk losing the lead. And with that, we risk seeing the opposition launching damaging attacks that could alter the trajectory of this high-stakes election.

Mayra Flores is fighting to reclaim her seat and protect the America First values we hold dear—limited government, strong national defense, and economic freedom. But she needs your help to fend off these attacks and pull into the lead.

Here is our urgent request: Contribute $10 or more immediately to help Mayra Flores reclaim her seat and stand strong for our values in Texas.

GIVE $10
GIVE $20
GIVE $30
ANOTHER AMOUNT
This race is far too important, and the stakes are too high to stand on the sidelines. Let’s not wake up after Election Day wishing we had done more. The time to act is now.

Let’s rise to this occasion and ensure we secure a Republican victory in this critical race. We need to put our full weight behind Mayra Flores, so she can lead TX-34 and our nation towards a brighter, more prosperous future.
Thank you for your steadfast support and your commitment to the fight.
House GOP Leadership Alerts

Is Abortion a Constitutional Right? Unraveling the Debate

Before delving into this discussion, it is essential to clarify that the topic at hand deals with the legality of abortion by the U.S. Constitution, not its morality or the underlying philosophical debates surrounding the issue.

The Constitutional Question

The question of whether abortion is a constitutional right is a deeply divisive and contentious one in American society. In many ways, the issue brings us to the heart of the Constitution's interpretation and the role of the judiciary in our democratic system.

The recent Supreme Court decision in the Dobbs v. Jackson case has further ignited the debate. Justice Alito's majority opinion states:

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled. The Constitution does not refer to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely—the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”

Constitutional Simplicity

One of the enduring strengths of the U.S. Constitution lies in its simplicity. If the Constitution and the Bill of Rights do not explicitly articulate a right, then, according to some interpretations, it does not exist as a Constitutional right. This logic asserts that the Roe v. Wade decision, which recognized the right to abortion, did not alter or modify the Constitution.

The Path to Constitutional Change

Amending the Constitution is a formidable process. It requires the people, rather than a few judges, to initiate and approve changes. Article V of the Constitution outlines the process of amending it, a method that thankfully does not leave the task in the hands of partisan judges.

A History of Amendments

Interestingly, throughout history, approximately 11,699 amendment changes have been proposed in Congress through 2016. Yet, only the 18th Amendment that established Prohibition was later repealed by the states. [Read more on this topic here]

Two Routes to Abortion Rights

If one wishes to establish abortion as a right or a legal option, two avenues are available:

1. Amendment via Article V: Two-thirds of state legislatures can call a Convention of States, and if the three-fourths vote to ratify a proposed amendment, it becomes a Constitutional right.

2. State Legislation: Alternatively, individuals can advocate for state legislatures to pass laws allowing abortion within their jurisdiction.

The ongoing debate around abortion and its status within the U.S. Constitution illustrates the inherent complexity and dynamism of constitutional law. It's a testament to the flexibility of our system, allowing us to navigate deep and often irreconcilable differences within our society.

This process is a beautiful demonstration of the power and responsibility vested in the people, whether the issue is abortion or any other right not currently explicitly stated in the U.S. Constitution.

Do you want to learn more about what you can do to act NOW! and save our Constitution?
https://www.thefifthprinciple.coop/wcid.html

Take your learning to the next level:

✍️ Join our course on faith here.
https://www.thefifthprinciple.coop/faith.html

✍️Learn about historical events that shape our future. Flashback to a Fabulous Future.
https://www.voiceamerica.com/show/4117/flashback-to-a-fabulous-future

✍️ Join us on our learning Journey to Plymouth, MA, on August 30, 2023 – September 4, 2023. Learn more here.
https://keap.page/ysn122/monument-to-our-fathers-tour.html

✍️ Join our Bible Study Group. Study the Bible through the lens of our Founding Fathers. We use David Barton’s Founder’s Bible when we meet once a week on Sundays at 6:00 p.m. Eastern. There is no charge for this class.
https://thefoundersbible.com/

✍️ To join our waiting list, sign up thru the following links:

For our Biblical Citizenship, and the American Campfire Revival courses. There is no charge for these courses.
https://www.thefifthprinciple.coop/membership.html

#homeschool, #history, #unitedstates, #consitution, #foundingfathers, #travel, #tour, #historical, #family, #bible, #biblical, #faith

Is Abortion a Constitutional Right? Unraveling the Debate

Before delving into this discussion, it is essential to clarify that the topic at hand deals with the legality of abortion by the U.S. Constitution, not its morality or the underlying philosophical debates surrounding the issue.

The Constitutional Question

The question of whether abortion is a constitutional right is a deeply divisive and contentious one in American society. In many ways, the issue brings us to the heart of the Constitution's interpretation and the role of the judiciary in our democratic system.

The recent Supreme Court decision in the Dobbs v. Jackson case has further ignited the debate. Justice Alito's majority opinion states:

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled. The Constitution does not refer to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely—the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.”

Constitutional Simplicity

One of the enduring strengths of the U.S. Constitution lies in its simplicity. If the Constitution and the Bill of Rights do not explicitly articulate a right, then, according to some interpretations, it does not exist as a Constitutional right. This logic asserts that the Roe v. Wade decision, which recognized the right to abortion, did not alter or modify the Constitution.

The Path to Constitutional Change

Amending the Constitution is a formidable process. It requires the people, rather than a few judges, to initiate and approve changes. Article V of the Constitution outlines the process of amending it, a method that thankfully does not leave the task in the hands of partisan judges.

A History of Amendments

Interestingly, throughout history, approximately 11,699 amendment changes have been proposed in Congress through 2016. Yet, only the 18th Amendment that established Prohibition was later repealed by the states. [Read more on this topic here]

Two Routes to Abortion Rights

If one wishes to establish abortion as a right or a legal option, two avenues are available:

1. Amendment via Article V: Two-thirds of state legislatures can call a Convention of States, and if the three-fourths vote to ratify a proposed amendment, it becomes a Constitutional right.

2. State Legislation: Alternatively, individuals can advocate for state legislatures to pass laws allowing abortion within their jurisdiction.

The ongoing debate around abortion and its status within the U.S. Constitution illustrates the inherent complexity and dynamism of constitutional law. It's a testament to the flexibility of our system, allowing us to navigate deep and often irreconcilable differences within our society.

This process is a beautiful demonstration of the power and responsibility vested in the people, whether the issue is abortion or any other right not currently explicitly stated in the U.S. Constitution.

Do you want to learn more about what you can do to act NOW! and save our Constitution?
https://www.thefifthprinciple.coop/wcid.html

Take your learning to the next level:

✍️ Join our course on faith here.
https://www.thefifthprinciple.coop/faith.html

✍️Learn about historical events that shape our future. Flashback to a Fabulous Future.
https://www.voiceamerica.com/show/4117/flashback-to-a-fabulous-future

✍️ Join us on our learning Journey to Plymouth, MA, on August 30, 2023 – September 4, 2023. Learn more here.
https://keap.page/ysn122/monument-to-our-fathers-tour.html

✍️ Join our Bible Study Group. Study the Bible through the lens of our Founding Fathers. We use David Barton’s Founder’s Bible when we meet once a week on Sundays at 6:00 p.m. Eastern. There is no charge for this class.
https://thefoundersbible.com/

✍️ To join our waiting list, sign up thru the following links:

For our Biblical Citizenship, and the American Campfire Revival courses. There is no charge for these courses.
https://www.thefifthprinciple.coop/membership.html

#homeschool, #history, #unitedstates, #consitution, #foundingfathers, #travel, #tour, #historical, #family, #bible, #biblical, #faith

GOOD, SINCE HES RACIST, HATE CRIMES, PREJUDICE, ANTI AMERICAN, DISCRIMINATES AGAINST SENIOR CITIZENS, REMOVE HER LICENSE,,REMOVE HER CITIZENSHIP, LIFE IN PRISON,,,SINCE SHE DOESNT INDICT JOE, PUT HIM IN PRISON,BRIBES GIFTS CARS ARE ILLEGAL, SHES SUPPOSE TO WORK FOR AMERICAN CITIZENS, NOT JOE, KILLERY, OBERRY, SWABBEE, NAZI GEORGE, WEF,,DEEP STATE, LIFE IN PRISON FOR BRIBING JUDGES, POLITICIANS, BILLIONS IN FINES FOR NAZI GEORGE, SWABBEE,,DEEP STATE, WEF..ENEMY OF AMERICA,
Former President Donald Trump’s legal team is reportedly considering a move to have his case taken out of the hands of Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis.
According to The Epoch Times, one defendant in the case has already requested that it be transferred from the county court to a federal court, and it seems highly likely that Trump’s team will pursue similar action.

“Ms. Willis’ case may face at least one legal hurdle in the form of a federal law that allows individuals who were federal officeholders at the time of an alleged criminal act to have the case go before a federal court,” the report said.
“Mark Meadows, who was also charged in the Georgia case and who was the White House chief of staff at the time, has already filed to have his case moved to federal court, and numerous legal experts have suggested President Trump might do the same,” the report continued.

“Moving the case from the Fulton County Superior Court to the local federal court could alter the dynamics of the trial and prove advantageous to President Trump in the long run,” the report added.
As the former president seeks to reclaim his position in 2024, there is speculation that he may seek to grant himself a pardon for any federal offenses.

However, it is important to note that the authority to do so does not extend into state-level jurisdictions. Trump’s attorney Alina Habba has even commented on this possibility, saying that Willis deliberately brought her indictment “so that if [Trump] is president, he can’t pardon himself if he’s convicted.”
Paul Kamenar, an established legal scholar, further emphasizes this point by noting that transferring the case to a federal court would create an additional level of complexity and require two separate trials – one in state court and another before a federal judge.

So, I mean, this is going to be a circus. It’s totally unwieldy,” Kamenar told The Epoch Times.
Another Trump lawyer, Christina Bobb, said she believes the former president will ultimately file to move the case to a federal court.

“I think they probably will. I mean, that’ll be a decision the trial team makes, but I would expect them to do the same thing. And I would expect it to get removed,” Bobb said. “This case is properly venued in federal court, to the extent it’s proper at all.”
The outlet noted further:
The 41-count indictment includes 13 charges against President Trump and additional charges for at least 18 alleged co-conspirators.

In addition to the RICO violation, the former president faces another three counts of solicitation of a violation of oath by a public officer, two counts of conspiracy to commit forgery in the first degree, two counts of conspiracy to commit filing of false documents, two counts of conspiracy to commit false statements and writings, two counts of committing false statements and writings, and one count of conspiracy to commit impersonating a public officer.

The indictment also alleges the RICO conspiracy operated at times in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Washington D.C.
“The fact that you’ve got a little district attorney in one county that’s only part of Atlanta, doesn’t even cover the whole city, is bringing claims for racketeering in Arizona and Pennsylvania and Michigan, and she’s just greatly enlarged her jurisdiction by claiming racketeering. I think it’s quite outrageous,” Bobb said.